Epistemology Google Group

Plain English Physics 101

thejohnlr...@gmail.com (johnlawrencereedjr) — Mon, 21 May 2012 08:48:14 UT

Plain English Physics 101
Published under new title
Modified Monday, May 21, 2012
johnlawrencereed jr

Excerpt on Ptolemy:
Where Wigner noted the "uncanny" usefulness of mathematics, I noted
that the usefulness remains, regardless of the veracity of our a
priori assumptions. As an example, first consider the Ptolemaic, Earth

Excerpt from excerpts

thejohnlr...@gmail.com (johnlawrencereedjr) — Wed, 16 May 2012 15:38:07 UT

Since what we feel as gravitational Force [mg] may also be
quantitatively defined as [ma] where mass is derived and conserved
and [g] is an independent property of location, we think that the
entire universe can be explained in terms of what we feel. We think
that we have "proved" that what we feel and call "gravity" [mg], is

Does somebody know what Vacuum is ?

socra...@bezeqint.net (socratus@bezeqint.net) — Wed, 16 May 2012 07:17:03 UT

Does somebody know what Vacuum is ?
1.
Book : ‘Dreams of a final theory’ by Steven Weinberg. Page 138.
‘ It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we cannot
reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not
sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero

Re: A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.

socra...@bezeqint.net (socratus@bezeqint.net) — Sun, 13 May 2012 14:50:11 UT

A New Limit on Photon Mass.

[link]

===.

Re: A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.

socra...@bezeqint.net (socratus@bezeqint.net) — Sun, 13 May 2012 06:31:08 UT

What is the electron configuration ?

Is the electron a photon with toroidal topology?

[link]

Matter and Form: when they are paradoxical.

socra...@bezeqint.net (socratus@bezeqint.net) — Wed, 09 May 2012 18:11:58 UT

Matter and Form: when they are paradoxical.
=.
Wood is itself a matter.
Wood is itself a form, a geometrical form.
A cupboard made of wood is a real whole of form and matter.
Geometrical form and matter are 'grown together' in it.
No form exist without matter.
Nor can there be matter without form.

Re: A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.

socra...@bezeqint.net (socratus@bezeqint.net) — Wed, 09 May 2012 06:08:26 UT

Electron’s fine structure constant.
=.
It is interesting to understand the Sommerfeld formula:
a= e^2 / h*c, where {a} is fine structure constant: 1/137
Feynman expressed (a ) quantity as
‘ by the god given damnation to all physicists ‘.
But the fine structure constant is not independent quantity,

Re: [epistemology 12649] A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.

awori.ach...@gmail.com (awori achoka) — Sun, 06 May 2012 15:23:53 UT

U implying God exists?

A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.

socra...@bezeqint.net (socratus@bezeqint.net) — Sat, 05 May 2012 04:14:01 UT

A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.
=.
Electron isn’t a point.
Electron has a geometrical form.
Electron’s geometrical form isn’t static, isn’t firm.
Electron’s geometrical form can be changed by his own inner spin.
Electron’s own inner spin can be described with three ( 3 ) formulas:

Re: Digest for epistemology@googlegroups.com - 4 Messages in 1 Topic

einse...@gmail.com (einseele) — Fri, 04 May 2012 14:36:50 UT

Hello Michael
Liked your post
A turing M should rebuild the information out of a black box, were
information is somehow stored-not stored (needs to be rebuilt).
Is this what you meant?
The reference to time being rolled back I agree 100%, or like saying
the same for entropy

thks

Re: [epistemology 12614] Digest for epistemology@googlegroups.com - 4 Messages in 1 Topic

mikeatovi...@gmail.com (Michael Atovigba) — Tue, 01 May 2012 13:35:56 UT

Quite interesting, that information is (as a postulate or hypothesis?)
never lost but stored in some form in the black box (hole). Thus, we should
manufacture a computer or turing M that could retrieved information from
the black hole and present as (live) historical matter. Implies that time
could be rolled back to minus infinity.

Re: Where did the electron come from ?

socra...@bezeqint.net (socratus@bezeqint.net) — Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:09:15 UT

A vacuum that produces an electron, or anything
else, is not a vacuum at all.

Craig Weinberg

A vacuum that produces an electron in local area
is not more a vacuum at all.

socratus
==.

Re: Where did the electron come from ?

whatsons...@gmail.com (Craig Weinberg) — Sun, 29 Apr 2012 15:09:05 UT

I think that vacuum comes from the electron instead. An electron is
nothing but a measure of matter's sense of matter. QED approaches
matter from the outside in - which works, to a point, but ultimately
doesn't make sense. A vacuum that produces an electron, or anything
else, is not a vacuum at all.

Where did the electron come from ?

socra...@bezeqint.net (socratus@bezeqint.net) — Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:37:51 UT

Where did the electron come from ?
From vacuum of course
Why?
Because according to QED electron disappears
in vacuum having infinite parameters. And because
“ The law of conservation and transformation
energy/mass” doesn’t give him to die there –
he must appear again according to " a method

Re: From 1905 the SRT doesn’t give sleep.

socra...@bezeqint.net (socratus@bezeqint.net) — Thu, 26 Apr 2012 03:05:53 UT

I am not sure on this fixed (rest) reference frame at all.
/ archytas /
==.
It means that you say: ‘I am not sure what Vacuum exist. ’
==.
" The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t
correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct