Does somebody know what Vacuum is ?

[socr...@bezeqint.net]

Does somebody know what Vacuum is ?
1.
Book : ‘Dreams of a final theory’ by Steven Weinberg. Page 138.
‘ It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we cannot
reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not
sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero
simple have no meaning.’
/ Steven Weinberg. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 /
2.
‘If we were looking for something that we could conceive
of as God within the universe of the new physics,
this ground state, coherent quantum vacuum might be
a good place to start.’
/ Book ‘The quantum self ’ page 208 by Danah Zohar. /
3.
And Paul Dirac wrote:
‘ The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t
correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct
description
of something more complex? ‘
==.
Does somebody know what Vacuum is ?
==.
Socratus

[einseele]

The question about absolute zero, or vacuum cannot be answered within
a positive definition.

Since a positive description would add any sort of substance, even
abstract, that will contaminate the very same principle of vacuum
Vacuum or absolute zero, or any other absolute object cannot be
defined by definition.
You cannot say anything about God without limiting the same object you
try to describe. God cannot have limits

In other words, if I say God is an almighty being, then S/he cannot be
a man or a woman, or any other lesser object. So if there is something
S/he cannot be we find that S/he is not as almighty as it should be

Vacuum, absolute zero and all absolut objects are linguistic instances
of your own limitations, or mine btw.

Stop looking for vacuum or God, you will not find it (the it part is
your limit)

On 16 maio, 04:17, "socra...@bezeqint.net" <socra...@bezeqint.net>
wrote:

> Does somebody know what  Vacuum is ?
> 1.
> Book : ‘Dreams of a final theory’ by Steven Weinberg. Page 138.
> ‘ It is true  . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we cannot
>  reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not
> sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero
>  simple have no meaning.’
> / Steven Weinberg. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 /
> 2.
> ‘If we were looking for something that we could conceive
> of as God within the universe of the new physics,
> this ground state, coherent quantum vacuum might be
>  a good place to start.’
> / Book  ‘The quantum self ’ page 208  by Danah Zohar. /