Re: [epistemology 0] Digest for epistemology@googlegroups.com - 3 Messages in 3 Topics

[michael atovigba]

Socratus has reminded us of the dualism of particles provided by quantum theory. His words: "We have one brain which works dualistically according to the Quantum theory of Dualism of particle."
"... indeed an understanding of psi phenomena and of consciousness must provide the basis of an improved
understanding of quantum mechanics." / Evan Walker /

My view:

I suggest that quantum theorists study and adopt the meridian funtion (equation) which I presented in 2003 before the Mathematical Association of Nigeria (MAN) which was also sent to International Mathematical Union IMU in New Jersy USA. I have used the equation to provide the over 300-year old much sought for geometric proof of the probability theory. Interesting, the meridian equation governs the entire globe of R variable radius, and although shows what quatun theorists describe as dualism of particles, but within the extremes are pluralities, which reflects the true nature of the universe made up of the extremities of dualism but different biases of plurarities in various dimensiions. I believe the application of the meridian equation to quantum mechanics would shed more light on the behaviour of particles and the idea of material consciousness which seems to have been in the doldrums all this while. For instance, the meridian equation would demonstrate that the brain works dualistically and also pluralistically.

Socratus, what about that?

Garshagu Atovigba.

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:19 AM, <episte...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

  Today's Topic Summary

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/topics

• What is the material basis of Consciousness ? [1 Update]
• The crash of classical theory of prob... [1 Update]
• Claude Levi-Strauss dies [1 Update]

 Topic: What is the material basis of Consciousness ?

socratus <isr...@yahoo.com> Dec 04 05:06AM -0800

 
We have one brain which works dualistically
according to the Quantum theory of Dualism of particle.
== .
"... indeed an understanding of psi phenomena and of
consciousness must provide the basis of an improved
understanding of quantum mechanics."
/ Evan Walker /


 

 Topic: The crash of classical theory of prob...

"mikeat...@gmail.com" <mikeat...@gmail.com> Dec 03 01:25PM

 
The crash of classical theory of prob...:
http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dwhf8fx_0gst3xrnh
 
---
We must critically look at the new theory of probability as the classical
theory has crashed. I presented this, the geometric proof of the
probability theory, otherwise called the meridian probability theory (or
function) in 2004 at Uinversity of Agriculture Makurdi Nigeria, before the
National Universities Commission NUC and Prof. Gabriel Oyibo of Offapit
University USA who was campaigning for the expungement of probability from
the world university curriculum because he was unable to find its geometric
proof with GAGUT. Remember that for over 300 years the search for the
geometric proof of the theory has been futile. Atovigba, GMV.


 

 Topic: Claude Levi-Strauss dies

archytas <arch...@live.co.uk> Dec 03 01:19PM -0800

 
I must admit I'm amazed at what can go wrong. Windows is definitely
some kind of CIA-backed crap. It makes no sense that an OS so shit is
the market leader without some kind of interference to make this so.
No one can explain to me what advantages any systems later than XP
possess other than touchscreen in 7. I have to run 64 bit stuff for
some calculation stuff I do and some experimental voice to text. Naff
all seems compatible with this, even some bits of Office. This said,
there wouldn't be much point in me doing stuff on a MAC for eventual
use on PCs! My old Ericsson 128 running DOS would still do most of
what I need (from 1982). Hey fucking ho!
 


 

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to episte...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to epistemology...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.