CONNED WITH THE WIND (Autant en arnaque le vent)
Georges Metanomski
CONNED WITH THE WIND
Obama's Climatic Hoax
with the motto:
In 1835 the story "The Emperor's New Clothes"
was published in Copenhagen.
In December 2009 the same Copenhagen welcomes
the Climate-Emperor Obama dressed up in wind
woven clothes, swearing to choke with them
the Global Warming.
Is there still a child left who'll dare
to say that the Emperor is naked?
Publisher Createspace
ISBN 1449917518
x=================
Je viens d'écrire un bouquin intitulé:
CONNED WITH THE WIND (Autant en arnaque le vent)
Obama's Climatic Hoax (Canular climatique d'Obama)
avec la devise:
En 1835 le conte "Les Habits neufs de l'Empereur"
fut publié à Copenhague.
En decembre 2009 la même Copenhague honore
le Clima-Empereur Obama affublé des habits
tissés du vent, dont il jure d'étouffer
l'Echauffement Climatique.
Reste-t-il encore un enfant qui osera dire
que l'Empereur est nu?
Editeur Createspace
ISBN 1449917518
Georges Metanomski
archytas
human history I can trust. Copenhagen seems more likely a collision
of ships of fools.
Georges Metanomski
--- On Fri, 12/11/09, archytas <arch...@live.co.uk> wrote:
> From: archytas <arch...@live.co.uk>
> Subject: [epistemology 11051] Re: CONNED WITH THE WIND (Autant en arnaque le vent)
> To: "Epistemology" <episte...@googlegroups.com>
> Date: Friday, December 11, 2009, 10:45 PM
> I doubt it Georges.
================
G:
What do you doubt? Did you read the book?
Georges.
================
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google Groups "Epistemology" group.
> To post to this group, send email to episte...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> epistemology...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
>
>
>
archytas
line with your minimalist theories, that, having disposed on any need
or chance of meeting nature, clearly render clothes superfluous. The
Emperor's 'child', these days, when pronouncing on nakedness, is
routinely banal. How are you these days? My novel, still unfinished
due to wolf from door essentials, has the character, loosely based on
my vision of you, slipping out of Argentina, just before the War of
Disgruntled Sheep, having ensured half the small stockpile of French
flying fish cannot harm British children-at-arms gulled into the South
Atlantic to create Saint Margaret. Perhaps, whilst down in the
general direction, you enlarged the ozone hole over the Antarctic to
ensure you and I slip cold to the grave, rather than broiled like
turkeys?
One Swedish child, at the alternative Copenhagen (no doubt one in an
alternate universe that sweeps unseen above our heads in our living
rooms?), claims we have merely wobbled rather close to the Sun, as in
medieval times, and this is why the wax on our wings is melting a
little. Another theory is that children themselves are responsible
for global warming as carbon footprints. I think it may be
Australians, the first sign being the floating up from the Antarctic
to that antipodean continent, of large icebergs. We all know
Australia is short of water to raise decent cricket pitches and teams
on. This is the probable cause, once one understands Aussies only
pretend to be permanently drunk, brash and witless.
Children across the world are asked a question as part of a test of
science education (the Finns come out top) in the OECD PISA study. It
is a simple matter of critical reasoning, though regarded in the study
as 'difficult' (itself something that should raise eyebrows on our
education systems). Less than a fifth of them get it right, failing
to note than proximity to and output of the 'glowing ball in the sky'
has rather a lot to do with temperatures here.
On 12 Dec, 08:28, Georges Metanomski <zg...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- On Fri, 12/11/09, archytas <archy...@live.co.uk> wrote: