*[Enwl-eng] Feature: Toward An Understanding of Louv's NatureDeficit Disorder

[ENWLine]

*Is Our Disconnect From Nature a Disorder?*
It's not in the DSM, but Richard Louv argues that being divorced
from nature is a sort of disorder. More and more research backs him up.

April 5, 2013 . By Michael Todd

Somewhere during the American experience, between Teddy Roosevelt and
color TV, being outdoors and maybe even working up a sweat started to
lose its universal appeal. There remain those who fetishize the
outdoors, from Ted Nugent to REI shoppers, and the urge to connect with
nature never vanished. But as Americans became more urban and more
cocooned in their cars and air conditioning, the values of nature were
honored more by their absence than in their activities.

The price of this disconnect is usually tallied via our bodies, with a
simple equation that a lack of outdoor activity must surely be connected
with the nation's growing waistline and obesity-related maladies like
diabetes. There's an always-growing corpus of academic work that does
make that correlation, and even causation, explicit. Last month, for
example, a policy brief from the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research
noted that in California as a whole, about a third as many kids who live
near parks get in an hour of physical activity a day (the recommended
daily threshold) at least five times a week compared to kids who can't
get to a park easily.

But increasingly, researchers are examining the impact of the natural
world on our minds. (At Pacific Standard, for example, we've reported on
the benefits of biophilic design, how nature makes us nicer or improves
our attention span, the rise of attention restoration theory, or even
how just looking at a picture of the outdoors can blunt the harsh edges
of stress.)

Last week, to cite one well-publicized recent study, Scottish
researchers outfitted pedestrians with mobile electroencephalographs and
set them loose for 25-minute strolls in Edinburgh. Those whose paths
wended through green spaces "showed evidence of lower frustration,
engagement and arousal, and higher meditation" based on EEG readings,
the academics wrote, adding a quantitative page to the annals of similar
qualitative "restorative literature."

These recent works add firepower to the longstanding cannonade of writer
Richard Louv, who summarized the disconnect as "nature-deficit disorder"
in his 2005 bestseller, Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children
From Nature-Deficit Disorder. That book and his 2011 volume, The Nature
Principle, are both study-filled dialectics on why it's important to
step outside much more frequently.

Louv, who described himself as an "advocacy journalist" (he co-founded
the Children & Nature Network) when we spoke last year, acknowledges
that his rubric of "nature-deficit disorder" is a two-edged sword, both
making the idea accessible and yet turning it into a new-agey pathology
at the same time. But use the word "disorder" and it conjures the DSM
and pharmaceuticals and longitudinal studies and, well, rigorous vetting.

Even people who might agree that there is a "deficit" might balk over
"disorder." When the U.K. National Trust invoked Louv's "useful
shorthand" repeatedly in a 28-page call to arms to "reverse this trend
towards a sedentary, indoor childhood," journalist Aleks Krotoski
wondered if medicalizing the issue wasn't just a sly way to
commercialize it:

My problem is with the implied consequences of this 'disorder,'
presented in a one-sided way and aimed at raising awareness among an
already concerned demographic in the hope that they will reach deep into
their pockets and donate their support to an institution that is
promoting what is, as many accept, commonsense.

Louv acknowledges both strands---raising awareness and common sense---in
his decision to use the phrase. When Last Child was published, "I said
very clearly, this is not a known medical diagnosis. This is, though, a
way to look at this issue in a way that we can understand. And when I
say that phrase people know exactly what it is, parents know what it is.
I don't have to write a long white paper."

The decision to spotlight the disorder, which Louv said he initially
resisted as making his book a bumper sticker---"I was an investigative
journalist and all"---has paid dividends. Saying he'd endorse any phrase
that keeps people's attention on this issue, "I know that this one, to
my surprise, has worked and much of that point/counter-point, much of
that debate, might not be happening without that phrase in the first place."

But maybe a little medicalization might be in order. As he's told a
gathering of the American Academy of Pediatrics, among others, "If you
think that writing a tongue-in-cheek, or an actually serious,
prescription to 'go outside and have some exercise,' would do some good,
then please do it."

WHILE SOME MIGHT BRIDLE at the quasi-science of nature-deficit disorder
or quail at cherry-picking research, many putative Aldo Leopolds have
traded in what might charitably be called mysticism over the years. His
evidence-based approach is necessary tonic, Louv says, in an arena he
calls "terribly understudied." The historic dearth of such scholarship,
he believes, "says a lot about the priorities of science:" Since nature
studies are unlikely to produce a profitable product, they get short shrift.

Of late, the last dozen years of so, Louv says he's seen an increasing
number of researchers and policy wonks studying humans and nature.
Still, he finds many in academe have a "blind spot" about how natural
environments might shape behavior and brain architecture, pointing out
how many animal studies in medicine and psychology take place in
unnatural environments for the animals, which may or may not stress out
the beasts and affect the study outcomes.

Some of the nature research that does take place is revelatory, but much
of it reinforces the maternal injunction to go outside and play; it's
good for you.

"There are no new ideas, really," Louv suggests, but there is new
evidence. Citing the spate of park building in the early 1900s, he
notes, "They didn't have a lot of science to back up the idea that parks
were good for people and that nature, [even] urban nature, was
restorative. Those parks, including Central Park, were supported by
industrialists who wanted healthier and more productive workers. So
again this isn't new knowledge. ... In a sense, it's lost information,
forgotten information, whether it's urban design or how families conduct
themselves."
More like this: Environment, The 101 Tags: Activity, Children, Nature
Share on mailtoShare on facebookShare on twitterShare on tumblrShare on
pinterest_shareShare on printfriendlyMore Sharing Services
About Michael Todd

Most of Michael Todd's career has been spent in newspaper journalism,
ranging from papers in the Marshall Islands to tiny California farming
communities. Before joining the publishing arm of the Miller-McCune
Center, he was managing editor of the national magazine Hispanic
Business. Follow him @MTodd_PSMag




http://www.psmag.com/environment/nature-deficit-disorder-outdoors-outside-54707/


*** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
material is distributed, without profit, for research and educational
purposes only. ***



From: "Yahoo Newsgroups" <vasi...@ramapo.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 1:32 PM
Subject: Feature: Toward An Understanding of Louv's Nature Deficit Disorder


------------- * ENWL * ------------
Ecological North West Line * St. Petersburg, Russia
Independent Environmental Net Service: http://www.bellona.ru/enwl/
Russian: ENWL(discussions), ENWL-inf(FSU information), ENWL-misc(any topics)
English: ENWL-eng (world information)
en...@lew.spb.org, enwl...@lew.spb.org, en...@lew.spb.org, en...@lew.spb.org
Subscription, Moderator: vf...@lew.spb.org or en...@enw.net.ru
Archive: http://enwl.bellona.ru/pipermail/
and http://groups.google.com/group/enwl/
SEE ALSO: http://www.bellona.org (English)and http://www.bellona.ru
(Russian)
RSS: http://groups.google.ru/group/enwl/feeds?hl=ru
(C) Please refer to exclusive articles of ENWL
-------------------------------------
ONLY if your address is subscribed:
Enwl-eng mailing list
Enwl...@enwl.bellona.ru
http://enwl.bellona.ru/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/enwl-eng