Oii
(Hi!), from COP30 (again), where by now no
one has any doubts: safeguarding climate information
integrity is key to making climate action work.
A
lot of people stopped me in the halls of Belém to ask whether, five years
ago, when I created Lies Have a Price (‘Mentira Tem Preço’) to
expose the cost of the supply chain of climate lies, I ever imagined we’d
make it onto COP30’s official agenda. And the answer is: I did imagine it.
Or better: ÉGUA! My favorite expression from Pará, said with all the
affection it deserves.
Seeing
history change while you’re part of the solution is what keeps me
going.
For
the first time, climate information integrity entered COP’s official
agenda, with a Brazilian special envoy: Frederico Assis. The opening came
with a speech by President Luiz Inácio Lula da
Silva stressing the need to deliver “a new defeat to climate deniers.” One
week later, the UN Secretary-General stated: “There can be no climate
action without information integrity.”
The
second achievement was also unprecedented: a collective movement involving
hundreds of people and organizations from science, technology, grassroots
leadership, journalism, advertising, health, and the socioenvironmental
and private sectors. This ecosystem understood that climate disinformation
affects us all. That’s why they came together to demand concrete
solutions, formalized in an open letter published by CAAD on November 12.
It was powerful to open this conversation inside the COP with so many
committed people.
Mentira
Tem Preço on Instagram: "Você já parou pra pensar em qu…
The
third breakthrough was the launch of the Declaration on Information Integrity, with
João Brant (Brazil’s Secretary for Digital Policy), Charlotte Scaddan
(senior UN advisor), Guilherme Canela (UNESCO director) and
representatives from the new signatory countries. The document is clear: countries commit to
promoting information integrity at every level — international, national,
and local — while respecting human rights and the principles of the Paris
Agreement.
As
Brant announced the new signatories, his phone kept buzzing. Two more
countries had just joined. Total at that moment: 13 committed nations.
The
fourth achievement is ours: we launched the Climate Information Integrity
Dossier, in three languages (Portuguese, English, and Spanish), in both digital and print
formats. The dossier reveals the cost of the climate-lie supply chain and
highlights an essential point: the new wave of climate denial is
economic.
Download
Here!
(Side
note: the COP president himself, André Corrêa do Lago, said exactly that
in an interview with TV Brasil.)
The
fifth achievement was witnessing a wave of integration around this agenda:
more than 100 panels and activities with partners discussing information
integrity — on social media, in action plans, in ongoing projects, in
conversations, and on COP stages.
Ship’s
log: millions of people pulled into the daily stream of climate lies at
COP
After
coffee came the lie of the day. Sounds like a joke, but that’s really how
our mornings started. And the numbers were influencer-level. By the 17th,
we had logged 171 disinformation posts in nine days, each one reaching an
average of 300,000 people. The peak came on Day 2, when climate lies
reached a combined 17 million.
And
speaking of posts: what do most of the top-performing COP posts have in
common?
(We’ll
get to that.)
The
hashtag FLOP30
The
anti-COP campaign even had its own hashtag: FLOP30 - 'Flop' means failure.
Rafa
stepping in to explain Brazilian internet teen slang - feels
like.
Not
every disinformation post used FLOP30, but almost every FLOP30 post had
disinformation. It’s an old tactic, and definitely not a Brazilian
invention. Climate deniers have been calling COP a “flop” on social media
since at least COP26. And again at COP27, COP28, and COP29.
This
was another finding from the Observatory for Information Integrity
(Oii, remember ;), in partnership with a CAAD
researcher. Every day, she tracked the 50 most-viewed posts about COP30
and, using our Reference Guide, flagged which ones contained
disinformation tactics.
The
Lie-O-Meter blew up on the 11th: 17.9 million total reach
On
Day 2, the main theme of the lies and distortions was an Indigenous
protest at the entrance of the Blue Zone, the official restricted area
where negotiations take place. Of all the top-viewed posts that day, 46
percent were filled with lies or misleading narratives made to engage
easily.
The
targets: Indigenous peoples and activists.
Each
post averaged 750,000 impressions and around 30,000 likes and comments.
Average, okay? Not the total. The tactics repeat, and
so do the prejudices: latching onto whatever is trending to claim
Indigenous people are manipulated, or to link activism to
terrorism.
TRUMP
Day
10: 8.7 million total reach
The
big engine of disinformation on the first day of the conference was a
message from former U.S. president Donald Trump about a story you’ve seen
here before: the road that was never built for COP, but that keeps being
used as bait. Of the 50 most-viewed COP posts on Day 10, 18 contained
disinformation, with an average reach of nearly 500,000 per post.
German
Chancellor Friedrich Merz
A
rough day, and not just for German diplomacy. Almost half of the top posts
contained disinformation tactics. Combined reach: 3.6 million. The lie of
the day claimed there was a “global feeling” that COP was a total
disaster.
Aldo
Rebelo
He
owned the spotlight. The former congressman posted stories we’ve mapped
countless times: that NGOs “control” the Amazon as if it were under siege,
even though we know what actually expanded there was organized crime. And
that conservation is the enemy of progress. Straight-up stenography
journalism never helps. Guess what happened? A great video to heat up a
dead Sunday on social media.
The
price of the coxinha
Days
8 and 9: 8.8 million total reach.
Did
you see that? The story about overpriced food in
the Blue Zone became a stage for two politicians, Congressman Rogério
Barra from Pará (PL) and Senator Cleitinho Azevedo from Minas Gerais
(Republicanos), to make baseless accusations about the event’s
food-service contract. Barra’s Instagram post reached 578,000 people and
Cleitinho’s reached 425,000. Both had more than 20,000 likes, comments,
and shares.
Back
to the question: looking across the posts, what did most screenshots have
in common?
The
bait: warnings about scandal, terrorism, or corruption, without
evidence.
Who:
politicians (current, former, and aspiring), Revista Oeste, and Brasil
Paralelo.
The
reputation layer: lots of blue verification badges on Meta and
X.