Message from discussion
Status of Env.js?
Received: by 10.210.3.25 with SMTP id 25mr1328735ebc.14.1256747100422;
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.210.3.25 with SMTP id 25mr1328734ebc.14.1256747100363;
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <thatcher.christop...@gmail.com>
Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (ey-out-1920.google.com [74.125.78.149])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 14si294147ewy.5.2009.10.28.09.24.59;
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of thatcher.christop...@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.149 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.78.149;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of thatcher.christop...@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.149 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=thatcher.christop...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so217614eyg.22
for <envjs@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=JkoVTwKH+qNpKoi7VzzwZmyI9Kj82NkL9iyCAvaJW0k=;
b=uDEwTZKLQrWdPpoTZh/Pf2sGN85I5gJDzotX9PDlQnmkTPYs9IKxr1W4RILKfyLpLu
sftmeKrblalORoF/ykDdLt0XssNuSESCku++qbqJotxHhzHyldMJw5euRX39H4c9PI/e
hX8KtHpoAaU9iw90OTk8z9EP9R01A7BedmDLc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
b=J9CDgM1EBYIxljHb6eyTIkbta8kMyNztL5JdX+GHO0kwktdnxMscYL822Tm3EQsMqz
vsaBzfNCye7O7wseNccC8w0qqXQTSR8etwZz0xaf/MrwHUL+zDDSSXvLkNh24WhskIJk
f2FXB0Flnzpk2gVrSeu5kYRnO+AM0AJ+q4gdU=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="000e0ce040886c56d10477013c73"
Received: by 10.210.7.24 with SMTP id 24mr11040628ebg.48.1256747099247; Wed,
28 Oct 2009 09:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4AE86E98.8070...@yahoo.fr>
References: <811c0690-ed9d-42e2-b78f-7a3937bb7...@m33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
<b99491f30910270340j46ad9e68ub4b85124e7a18...@mail.gmail.com>
<aa31b4ba-a635-4da8-a247-d4fd9b068...@m3g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
<770D7937-DCD6-422E-8D6F-987F17486...@smparkes.net>
<b99491f30910280829n7c4285b0lfe54e9ca0dafe...@mail.gmail.com>
<472CDCD4-494A-47F0-838D-CB99FE479...@smparkes.net>
<4AE86E98.8070...@yahoo.fr>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:24:59 -0400
Message-ID: <b99491f30910280924m297e3758rb382099b7433c...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [env-js] Re: Status of Env.js?
From: chris thatcher <thatcher.christop...@gmail.com>
To: envjs@googlegroups.com
--000e0ce040886c56d10477013c73
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I will check out NekoHTML again though I did try once, perhaps I didn't
explore it fully enough.
The Validator.nu you've mentioned before and I've been meaning to look at
it. It would be interesting to see if integration at the sax event level i=
s
possible.
Thatcher
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Marc Guillemot <mguille...@yahoo.fr>wrote=
:
>
> My 2 cents:
>
> it's possible to use NekoHTML for this kind of things (document.write,
> setting innerHTML). Validator.nu is surely an interesting alternative as
> it should become the standard parer of Gecko.
>
> Cheers,
> Marc.
>
>
> Steven Parkes a =C3=A9crit :
> >
> > On Oct 28, 2009, at Oct 28,8:29 AM , chris thatcher wrote:
> >
> >> The biggest problem was that the libraries wanted to treat every
> >> fragment as a document and would wrap it with html and body tags etc.
> >
> > Yeah, I figured there were things I hadn't considered ... including
> > that. Yuck.
> >
> > Wonder if the wrapped node could be pulled out of the tidy result by
> > id. Of course, that would assume you could put an id on it if it
> > didn't have one, which I guess is no easier. Yuck.
> >
> > >
> >
>
>
> >
>
--=20
Christopher Thatcher
--000e0ce040886c56d10477013c73
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I will check out NekoHTML again though I did try once, perhaps I didn't=
explore it fully enough.<br><br>The Validator.nu you've mentioned befo=
re and I've been meaning to look at it.=C2=A0 It would be interesting t=
o see if integration at the sax event level is possible.<br>
<br>Thatcher<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:1=
7 PM, Marc Guillemot <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:mguillemot@yah=
oo.fr">mguille...@yahoo.fr</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gm=
ail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt =
0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
My 2 cents:<br>
<br>
it's possible to use NekoHTML for this kind of things (document.write,<=
br>
setting innerHTML). Validator.nu is surely an interesting alternative as<br=
>
it should become the standard parer of Gecko.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Marc.<br>
<br>
<br>
Steven Parkes a =C3=A9crit :<br>
<div><div></div><div class=3D"h5">><br>
> On Oct 28, 2009, at Oct 28,8:29 AM , chris thatcher wrote:<br>
><br>
>> The biggest problem was that the libraries wanted to treat every<b=
r>
>> fragment as a document and would wrap it with html and body tags e=
tc.<br>
><br>
> Yeah, I figured there were things I hadn't considered ... includin=
g<br>
> that. Yuck.<br>
><br>
> Wonder if the wrapped node could be pulled out of the tidy result by<b=
r>
> id. Of course, that would assume you could put an id on it if it<br>
> didn't have one, which I guess is no easier. Yuck.<br>
><br>
> ><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br>Christopher=
Thatcher<br>
--000e0ce040886c56d10477013c73--