While ENTS reports typically include significant amounts of tree measurement data, WNTS as a growing forum starts of slowly in that regard, with attached word document. Subsequent reports, at least those I'll be submitting in the near future, will include an increasing amount of tree measurements, but may not rise to the level of Rucker Indices, etc., unless future demand outstrips our expectations. Which would be fine!
I hope the slightly different format/content will be pleasing.
> While ENTS reports typically include significant amounts of tree measurement data, WNTS as a growing forum starts of slowly in that regard, with attached word document. Subsequent reports, at least those I'll be submitting in the near future, will include an increasing amount of tree measurements, but may not rise to the level of Rucker Indices, etc., unless future demand outstrips our expectations. Which would be fine!
> I hope the slightly different format/content will be pleasing.
> Don, I don't see any Word document. Did you forget to attach it?
> Kouta
> On Nov 9, 1:35 am, DON BERTOLETTE <forestorat...@msn.com> wrote:
> > WNTS/ENTS folks-
> > While ENTS reports typically include significant amounts of tree measurement data, WNTS as a growing forum starts of slowly in that regard, with attached word document. Subsequent reports, at least those I'll be submitting in the near future, will include an increasing amount of tree measurements, but may not rise to the level of Rucker Indices, etc., unless future demand outstrips our expectations. Which would be fine!
> > I hope the slightly different format/content will be pleasing.
