Community <enterprise-web-developer-community@googlegroups.com>
Received: by 10.66.84.38 with SMTP id v6mr651178pay.7.1347643891733;
        Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:31:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: enterprise-web-developer-community@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.197.72 with SMTP id is8ls12793995pbc.5.gmail; Fri, 14 Sep
 2012 10:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.84.38 with SMTP id v6mr651173pay.7.1347643890734;
        Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.84.38 with SMTP id v6mr651172pay.7.1347643890725;
        Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com>
Received: from mail-pb0-f49.google.com (mail-pb0-f49.google.com [209.85.160.49])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p7si936259pby.0.2012.09.14.10.31.30
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com designates 209.85.160.49 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.49;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com designates 209.85.160.49 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com; dkim=pass header...@googlemail.com
Received: by pbbrq8 with SMTP id rq8so6544930pbb.22
        for <enterprise-web-developer-community@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=c/NiKVmZaKutcrG2rAfVRxbaNp0wmX3R9o3EYDgignk=;
        b=pJ3aYfF0OyV4SjykIDq79yC9TLIDWVjaogYMNRVy3bn/20UAlEdlEOsI8Ec5Y3fhMD
         +jE/fPj/Tl0uW1qpnTYbCUk9/WltBCiEOVKUe1CtKj/JrPaH5yDw5bM41w3UDf6G+uU2
         cZqP+hGKnVJjVIHdD+ssF3qktgfcSmllofCvzn9wsIcJZ6KtReXrE4gj2lwkzKRgI9Cz
         +Vwu5Kf+4IB8x6N0e1q9Bp8FMwtzmL0onnQSQH5BHUivlp6CidagZqllN5Uv1FQMdBJy
         7GdgYqoy4B8RFx9xqkK796/YrRXop7nickWnpdOcbiJWEFfgbz0NsI/l5bSlkZnvwtGF
         NtoA==
Received: by 10.66.75.168 with SMTP id d8mr4899154paw.63.1347643890566; Fri,
 14 Sep 2012 10:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.228.71 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAC7uzYfqwXStf6CtNXp=vbNxoCiUx71OFEwbhNg7dofsheU...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c81a5b1c-ba85-4dc0-a92f-048aa8adc1a2@googlegroups.com>
 <505342DC.5000...@e-cology.ca> <7480db27-7d13-4733-8dda-25c65f9ec...@k13g2000pbq.googlegroups.com>
 <CAF0qKV0YB7Fk3C_URnzzRtoyFTn4BWPs0-fpwRP4JWWa9Pt...@mail.gmail.com> <CAC7uzYfqwXStf6CtNXp=vbNxoCiUx71OFEwbhNg7dofsheU...@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike  Dupont <jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:31:09 +0200
Message-ID: <CAF0qKV3hdTbBV+zWfhiV_4h+aBMCaMwBMJH8Rs+9s=vyi5L...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [EWD:2667] Re: Raspberry pi Supercomputer
To: enterprise-web-developer-community@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 7:15 PM, LD 'Gus' Landis <ldlan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  Also, if you are suggesting writing the
> small amount of C code that is in GT.M.. you are off track.  There is
> good reason for that code to be written in assembler.. which is too
> obvious to discuss here.

I mean the bunch of assember routines in gtm, they could be generated
by a compiler, no? that would make porting easier, or are there c
equivalents for them?
mike


-- 
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org
Saving wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com
Contributor FOSM, the CC-BY-SA map of the world http://fosm.org
Mozilla Rep https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3