Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Emoji symbols: preliminary proposed code points
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  5 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Kenneth Whistler  
View profile  
 More options Jan 8 2009, 9:27 pm
From: Kenneth Whistler <k...@sybase.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:27:00 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Emoji symbols: preliminary proposed code points

> I have created a preliminary assignment of proposed code points for Emoji
> symbols. If you are interested, please see my post to the emoji4unicode
> group: Emoji symbols with proposed code point
> assignments

Thanks, Marcus... this is now getting to actual reviewable status
as a proposal for encoding. ;-)

> If you have feedback, please send it to that group, by emailing to
> emoji4unicode@googlegroups.com

e-01B U+23E9 HOURGLASS WITH FLOWING SAND

   That is an animation variant of the hourglass. I don't think
   it belongs in the 23XX block, but should stay with the 1F3XX
   additions.

   (For a precendent not to keep with the generic symbol, compare
   U+2709 ENVELOPE versus e-52A, e-52B, which are marked up and/or
   animated envelope symbols.)

e-50B U+1F41E BLOOD TYPE A

   This (and the 3 following) fit more naturally into the existing
   1F1XX ARIB block of Enclosed Alphanumeric Supplement, even
   though they have special meanings.

e-B7C U+1F447 LATIN CAPITAL LETTERS SYMBOL

   This (and the 4 following) also fit more naturally into the
   1F1XX Enclosed Alphanumeric Supplement as a set.

e-B09 U+2795 BLACK QUESTION MARK

   I question the treatment of this and e-B0A, e-B0B, but that
   is a separate issue. Just in terms of allocation, if these
   are proposed for the Dingbats block (which itself may be
   problematical), the better range is U+2753..U+2755,
   rather than U+2795..U+2797.

e-B51 U+2753 HEAVY PLUS SIGN

   Move to U+270A

e-B52 U+2754 HEAVY MINUS SIGN

   Fix glyph (showing as a solid black square now), and
   move to U+270B.

e-B54 U+2755 HEAVY DIVISION SIGN

   Move to U+2700. (or some other spot, doesn't matter much)

e-B63 U+2B55 WHITE LARGE CIRCLE

   This name and encoding is problematical. It will lead to
   confusion about the relationship between U+25EF LARGE CIRCLE
   and U+2B24 BLACK LARGE CIRCLE, which is the intended
   geometric pair for mathematical usage. As for the
   animated hour glass variant, this character should be
   renamed and moved out into the general emoji block
   at 1F3XX. I suggest LARGE CIRCLE VARIANT-1 and appropriate
   annotation as to the intent.

e-B73 U+2B56 WHITE LARGE DIAMOND

   (and e-B74, e-B75) These have the same kind of problem
   as the circle. They should not be encoded as if they
   were part of the mathematical set of graded size geometrics,
   when their origin is with some colored emoji dingbats.
   Reconsider the names, glyphs, and unifications for this
   run, as otherwise, they have the potential to disrupt
   the intent of the mathematical characters.

--Ken


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Markus Scherer  
View profile  
 More options Jan 8 2009, 9:49 pm
From: Markus Scherer <markus....@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:49:13 -0800
Local: Thurs, Jan 8 2009 9:49 pm
Subject: Re: Emoji symbols: preliminary proposed code points

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Kenneth Whistler <k...@sybase.com> wrote:
> > If you have feedback, please send it to that group, by emailing to
> > emoji4unicode@googlegroups.com

Ah, look at who's cross-posting now! [?]
Moving the symbols list to bcc.

I put the "move this to there" feedback into project issue
72<http://code.google.com/p/emoji4unicode/issues/detail?id=72>and will
implement it asap.

The feedback about the circle and diamonds is in issue
73<http://code.google.com/p/emoji4unicode/issues/detail?id=73>,
and I need to think about what this means for that whole subcategory of
symbols.

Thanks for your detailed feedback!
markus

  329.gif
< 1K Download

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Markus Scherer  
View profile  
 More options Jan 12 2009, 5:23 pm
From: Markus Scherer <markus....@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:23:31 -0800
Local: Mon, Jan 12 2009 5:23 pm
Subject: Re: Emoji symbols: preliminary proposed code points

Hi Ken,
I am trying to follow your allocation suggestions, but am running into
conflicts.

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Kenneth Whistler <k...@sybase.com> wrote:
> e-B09 U+2795 BLACK QUESTION MARK

>   I question the treatment of this and e-B0A, e-B0B, but that
>   is a separate issue. Just in terms of allocation, if these
>   are proposed for the Dingbats block (which itself may be
>   problematical), the better range is U+2753..U+2755,
>   rather than U+2795..U+2797.

U+2753..U+2755 are currently taken by the heavy operators which you mention
below but whose moves conflict with yet other symbols.

e-B51 U+2753 HEAVY PLUS SIGN

>   Move to U+270A

> e-B52 U+2754 HEAVY MINUS SIGN

>   Fix glyph (showing as a solid black square now), and
>   move to U+270B.

I have the rock/paper hand symbols there (e-B93 & e-B95) which belong to the
scissors hand symbol e-B94 which we unified with the existing U+270C.

e-B54 U+2755 HEAVY DIVISION SIGN

>   Move to U+2700. (or some other spot, doesn't matter much)

This one I could use, but I would prefer to keep the three additional
heavy-operator symbols together.

Suggestions?

markus


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Kenneth Whistler  
View profile  
 More options Jan 13 2009, 6:20 pm
From: Kenneth Whistler <k...@sybase.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:20:09 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Jan 13 2009 6:20 pm
Subject: Re: Emoji symbols: preliminary proposed code points
Markus,

> I am trying to follow your allocation suggestions, but am running into
> conflicts.

> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Kenneth Whistler <k...@sybase.com> wrote:

> > e-B09 U+2795 BLACK QUESTION MARK

> >   I question the treatment of this and e-B0A, e-B0B, but that
> >   is a separate issue. Just in terms of allocation, if these
> >   are proposed for the Dingbats block (which itself may be
> >   problematical), the better range is U+2753..U+2755,
> >   rather than U+2795..U+2797.

O.k. Well, once again, I question the appropriateness of sticking
these in the Dingbats block, but if they go there, the better
range is 2753..2755.

As a separate note, the "punctuation mark" dingbats in that
vicinity in the Dingbats block are BLAH-DE-BLAH *ORNAMENT*, so
if 3 more like things go in the Dingbats block, I suggest
also updating their names accordingly, with "ORNAMENT" as
part of the names, so that their
General_Category as gc=So, rather than punctuation, is clear.

> U+2753..U+2755 are currently taken by the heavy operators which you mention
> below but whose moves conflict with yet other symbols.

> e-B51 U+2753 HEAVY PLUS SIGN

> >   Move to U+270A

> > e-B52 U+2754 HEAVY MINUS SIGN

> >   Fix glyph (showing as a solid black square now), and
> >   move to U+270B.

> I have the rock/paper hand symbols there (e-B93 & e-B95) which belong to the
> scissors hand symbol e-B94 which we unified with the existing U+270C.

O.k. I missed that you had used 270A/270B for rock/paper hand symbols.

That is a reasonable choice, if 270C is unified with the Emoji
set scissors hand symbol. (Note, however, that in that case,
the font for 270A/270B *must* be harmonized with the longstanding
glyph design for 270C.)

> e-B54 U+2755 HEAVY DIVISION SIGN

> >   Move to U+2700. (or some other spot, doesn't matter much)

> This one I could use, but I would prefer to keep the three additional
> heavy-operator symbols together.

There are no operators in the Dingbats block. The "plus signs" are
all actually identified as crosses. And the U+2715 MULTIPLICATION X
isn't an operator, either -- it is just an arbitrary name for
a "X" dingbat that looks like the multiplication X. The real
operator is U+00D7, of course.

The range 2795..2797 could, of course, be used, but if the
holes in the Dingbat block are to be filled with Dingbats
from elsewhere, these are probably best saved for stuff like
WingDing arrow additions.

And I don't think the heavy operators belong with any real
math operators, either. I think your best option is to just
keep them with the big collection of 1F3XX generic emoji
symbols, without trying to treat them as part of the
Dingbats collection.

--Ken


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Markus Scherer  
View profile  
 More options Jan 13 2009, 7:31 pm
From: Markus Scherer <markus....@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:31:59 -0800
Local: Tues, Jan 13 2009 7:31 pm
Subject: Re: Emoji symbols: preliminary proposed code points

Thanks, Ken!
I implemented your recommendations (revision
r107<http://code.google.com/p/emoji4unicode/source/detail?r=107>)
and raised a new issue
83<http://code.google.com/p/emoji4unicode/issues/detail?id=83>for the
design of the rock & paper symbols.

markus


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »