Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
DOCOMO's comment
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Koji Takemura  
View profile  
 More options Jan 14 2009, 4:29 am
From: Koji Takemura <takem...@nttdocomo.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:29:44 +0900
Local: Wed, Jan 14 2009 4:29 am
Subject: DOCOMO's comment
Dear emoji4unicode group members,

NTT DOCOMO welcomes this initiative since it will dramatically improve
the interoperability of emoji. The emoji culture has grown in the mobile
phone community and has been very popular. Thanks to this initiative,
NTT DOCOMO also welcomes the potential of emoji to be used widely by the
Internet community as well. Based on its experience, NTT DOCOMO would
like to cooperate with this initiative in making the emoji culture even
more popular.

We find that there are some DOCOMO emojis that are not mapped to the
proposed symbols. We assume that the reason why they are not mapped to
the proposed symbols is due to the proprietary nature of these symbols.

We find the mapping between Unicode and existing emoji is useful to
increase interoperability.

We think this mapping doesn't influence the emoji mutual
conversion service among Japanese operators.
You can find DOCOMO's conversion rule at the following page.
Sorry for only Japanese page is available.
http://www.nttdocomo.co.jp/service/mail/imode_mail/function/emoji_con...

The mapping rule should be aligned with the existing services, however,
due to the limited time for reviewing the details of whether or not
these mappings are appropriate, please let us submit comments later if any,
as soon as they become available from our end.

Best regards,
Koji Takemura
NTT DOCOMO, INC.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Markus Scherer  
View profile  
 More options Jan 14 2009, 11:59 am
From: Markus Scherer <markus....@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:59:11 -0800
Local: Wed, Jan 14 2009 11:59 am
Subject: Re: DOCOMO's comment

Dear Koji Takemura,
Thank you very much for your kind and encouraging message. We would
appreciate your feedback but understand that your time is limited.

To answer your question:

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Koji Takemura <takem...@nttdocomo.co.jp>wrote:

> We find that there are some DOCOMO emojis that are not mapped to the
> proposed symbols. We assume that the reason why they are not mapped to
> the proposed symbols is due to the proprietary nature of these symbols.

That is correct. For the full list of all symbols we have data for, please
see this document:
http://www.unicode.org/~scherer/emoji4unicode/snapshot/full.html

The symbols which we did not consider for encoding are shown in
"strike-through" style and are mostly listed in the bottom section called
"8. Business logos/symbols".

Best regards,
markus
Google Internationalization


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »