Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
REE and Rails 4
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  5 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
cvshepherd  
View profile  
 More options Dec 21 2011, 1:46 pm
From: cvshepherd <colls...@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:46:37 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Dec 21 2011 1:46 pm
Subject: REE and Rails 4
Since Rails will be dropping support for Ruby < 1.9 with version 4, I
was wondering how the REE team was planning to deal with this.
I ask this more out of curiosity, since I don't use REE myself, but
obviously many people do, and for good reason.
So, what's going to happen?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Hongli Lai  
View profile  
 More options Dec 30 2011, 12:44 pm
From: Hongli Lai <hon...@phusion.nl>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:44:24 +0100
Local: Fri, Dec 30 2011 12:44 pm
Subject: Re: REE and Rails 4

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:46 PM, cvshepherd <colls...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Since Rails will be dropping support for Ruby < 1.9 with version 4, I
> was wondering how the REE team was planning to deal with this.
> I ask this more out of curiosity, since I don't use REE myself, but
> obviously many people do, and for good reason.
> So, what's going to happen?

We have no plans to port the REE patches to Ruby 1.9. It's too much of
an undertaking. Instead of fragmenting our man power, we want to focus
on our core products such as Phusion Passenger. One of the features
that's going to be in Passenger 4 is the ability to run multiple Ruby
versions from a single Phusion Passenger instance so that you can have
your Ruby 1.8 and Ruby 1.9 web apps side-by-side. REE will continue to
be maintained for the forseeable future, but only bug fixes and
security updates will be applied.

--
Phusion | Ruby & Rails deployment, scaling and tuning solutions

Web: http://www.phusion.nl/
E-mail: i...@phusion.nl
Chamber of commerce no: 08173483 (The Netherlands)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Kurt Stephens  
View profile  
 More options Jan 3 2012, 6:50 pm
From: Kurt Stephens <kurt...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:50:07 -0600
Local: Tues, Jan 3 2012 6:50 pm
Subject: Re: REE and Rails 4
The biggest improvement of REE for web applications is the copy-on-write
support in GC.  This could be ported to 1.9, however, there is
significant interest in improving/overhauling Ruby 1.9 GC.  Some
projects were discussed/demonstrated at RubyConf 2011.

These projects might be of interest to you:

http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4990
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/5392
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/5033
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4168

-- Kurt

On 12/30/11 11:44 AM, Hongli Lai wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
rogerdpack  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options Jan 12 2012, 3:57 pm
From: rogerdpack <rogerdp...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:57:05 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Jan 12 2012 3:57 pm
Subject: Re: REE and Rails 4
It would be nice to have a 1.9 with at least tcmalloc applied...
-r

On Jan 3, 4:50 pm, Kurt Stephens <kurt...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Kurt Stephens  
View profile  
 More options Jan 12 2012, 5:15 pm
From: Kurt Stephens <kurt...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:15:49 -0600
Local: Thurs, Jan 12 2012 5:15 pm
Subject: Re: REE and Rails 4
That should be a simple patch in its current form, but it might be
difficult to get it accepted upstream.

I might be able to work it into http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4990 as
a run-time/compile-time option.  I have run-time hooks for malloc(),
free() and friends in there already:
https://github.com/kstephens/ruby/tree/trunk-mem-api

BTW: there is core copy-on-write support in CRuby trunk right now and
I'm getting closer to having the BDW collector working under mem-api.

-- KAS

On 1/12/12 2:57 PM, rogerdpack wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »