Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Problem building Standalone with 3.0.1 Pro
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  6 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post will appear after it is approved by moderators
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
bkshepard  
View profile  
 More options Mar 20 2009, 8:21 pm
From: bkshepard <brian.shep...@usc.edu>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Mar 20 2009 8:21 pm
Subject: Problem building Standalone with 3.0.1 Pro
I am building a standalone that includes several iterations of the
tap.pan~ object.  When I build my app in MaxMSP (5.0.6), I then run
the Tap.Tools Builder from the Max Extras menu and it reports "Done!"
almost immediately.  Everything works fine until I try to run the app
on a different machine which reports multiple "no such object" and "no
such file in collective" messages in the Max window about the tap.pan~
object.  I also get the following long error message in the Max
window:

Referenced from: /Users/jenny/Desktop/EchoDamp.app/Contents/support/
extensions/tap.tools.mxo/Contents/MacOS/tap.tools
 2009-03-20 17:00:11.677 EchoDamp[756:20b] Error loading /Users/jenny/
Desktop/EchoDamp.app/Contents/support/extensions/tap.tools.mxo/
Contents/MacOS/tap.tools:  dlopen(/Users/jenny/Desktop/EchoDamp.app/
Contents/support/extensions/tap.tools.mxo/Contents/MacO
 S/tap.tools, 262): Library not loaded: @executable_path/../Frameworks/
JamomaDSP.framework/Versions/A/JamomaDSP

I've checked, and the tap.tools.mxo is in the extensions directory of
my built application, it just doesn't seem to be either authorized, or
working properly.

BTW, on the computer that has tap.tools installed, I get 8 copies of
"requirements.txt: no such file in collective."  One error for each
iteration of the tap.pan~ object.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Timothy Place  
View profile  
 More options Mar 21 2009, 9:17 am
From: Timothy Place <t...@electrotap.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 08:17:25 -0500
Local: Sat, Mar 21 2009 9:17 am
Subject: Re: [electrotap] Problem building Standalone with 3.0.1 Pro
Hi,

Thanks for the report.  This is definitely a bug in the 3.0.1 release
candidate and I will fix it ASAP.
best,
  Tim

--
Cycling '74 | http://cycling74.com
Electrotap  | http://electrotap.com

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
bkshepard  
View profile  
 More options Mar 21 2009, 1:03 pm
From: bkshepard <brian.shep...@usc.edu>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Mar 21 2009 1:03 pm
Subject: Re: Problem building Standalone with 3.0.1 Pro
Thanks Tim.  As an additional piece of information, I tried doing the
build on both a PPC and an Intel computer with the same results.  I
saw in the release notes that there is an issue with building on an
Intel and running on a PPC, but that seems to be a separate issue from
this.  Thanks, again!

On Mar 21, 6:17 am, Timothy Place <t...@electrotap.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Timothy Place  
View profile  
 More options Mar 22 2009, 4:47 pm
From: Timothy Place <t...@electrotap.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:47:09 -0500
Local: Sun, Mar 22 2009 4:47 pm
Subject: Re: [electrotap] Problem building Standalone with 3.0.1 Pro

Hi,

Attached is a fix for the Tap.Tools Builder in the 3.0.1 release  
candidate for the Mac (just replace your existing copy).  Proper  
installers are forthcoming.

best,
   Tim
____________________________________
Timothy Place
Cycling '74 | Electrotap | 74Objects

  TapToolsBuilder.maxpat.zip
5K Download

On 2009 Mar 20, at 7:21 PM, bkshepard wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
bkshepard  
View profile  
 More options Mar 22 2009, 8:02 pm
From: bkshepard <brian.shep...@usc.edu>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Mar 22 2009 8:02 pm
Subject: Re: Problem building Standalone with 3.0.1 Pro
Hey Tim,

Thanks so much for jumping on that!  That seems to have done the
trick!  A couple of questions for you, though.

1. I know from the release notes that builds done on an Intel machine
don't work on a PPC (I've already experienced that), so is it best to
just build everything on a PPC, or should I build on both--one
targeted for PPC machines and one for Intel machines?

2. I've asked this on the MaxMSP forum, but gotten no answer, but I
get the following error messages in the Max window of my builds:
pattr_obex: no such file in collective
mfont: no such file in collective
requirements.txt: no such file in collective
As you mentioned here before, the requirements.txt seems to not have
any effect and is more cosmetic.  How about the other two (pattr_obex
and mfont)?  Are they related to Tap.Tools?  If so, is it anything I
need to be concerned about?

Thanks, again, for fixing this!

On Mar 22, 1:47 pm, Timothy Place <t...@electrotap.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Timothy Place  
View profile  
 More options Mar 22 2009, 8:46 pm
From: Timothy Place <t...@electrotap.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:46:10 -0500
Local: Sun, Mar 22 2009 8:46 pm
Subject: Re: [electrotap] Re: Problem building Standalone with 3.0.1 Pro

On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:02 PM, bkshepard <brian.shep...@usc.edu> wrote:

> Hey Tim,

> Thanks so much for jumping on that!  That seems to have done the
> trick!  A couple of questions for you, though.

> 1. I know from the release notes that builds done on an Intel machine
> don't work on a PPC (I've already experienced that), so is it best to
> just build everything on a PPC, or should I build on both--one
> targeted for PPC machines and one for Intel machines?

Part of the problem with this is that I have inadequate resources to
fully research the problem with PPC machines.  Apple has not produced
a consumer PPC machine in over 3 years, so given my long list of
priorities this one does not find itself within the top 100.  If it
works for you, then yes by all means build on a PPC.  I have also seen
other reports about this problem regarding other third-party externals
as well, so I don't *think* the problem is limited to just Tap.Tools,
but like I said I have not been able to research it thoroughly.

> 2. I've asked this on the MaxMSP forum, but gotten no answer, but I
> get the following error messages in the Max window of my builds:
> pattr_obex: no such file in collective
> mfont: no such file in collective
> requirements.txt: no such file in collective
> As you mentioned here before, the requirements.txt seems to not have
> any effect and is more cosmetic.  How about the other two (pattr_obex
> and mfont)?  Are they related to Tap.Tools?  If so, is it anything I
> need to be concerned about?

Correct about the requirements.txt problem.  I would say that
pattr_obex is clearly something to do with pattr, and thus no anything
to do with Tap.Tools.  A spotlight of my hard disk shows that mfont is
something to do with js or jsui, and there is nothing related to
'mfont' in any Tap.Tools files.

> Thanks, again, for fixing this!

No problem -- thanks for the detailed reports!
  Tim

--
Cycling '74 | http://cycling74.com
Electrotap  | http://electrotap.com

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »