You cannot post messages because only members can post, and you are not currently a member.
Description:
Event-Driven Model Framework for ColdFusion. The name? EDM = Event-Driven Model, Mund = mouth (German), Mund = ancestral rule over the family / disciplinary power over members of the family / responsibility to protect the family (Old English). Edmund is also one of my cats :)
|
|
|
Edmund vs AOP
|
| |
I'm looking into Edmund and started wondering how it compares to AOP
as far as the problems each can solve. Taking a simple example like
logging, if you wanted to log a certain event, with Edmund your logger
would subscribe to an event and once the event was dispatched the
logger would be notified and run whatever logging code is specified.... more »
|
|
Adding an event queue?
|
| |
Currently, listeners in Edmund are either synchronous or asynchronous. A synchronous listener is executed "immediately" when an event is dispatched (well, as soon as Edmund hits it in the list of subscribers for that event) and control returns to Edmund when the listener is finished. An asynchronous listener is also executed "immediately" but... more »
|
|
Edmund and LDAP
|
| |
Would using Edmund to keep two parts of LDAP in sync make sense?
I have roles in LDAP and sometimes the employee in that role no longer
works here (I check that by looking elsewhere in LDAP)
So could Edmund handle the thread that deletes that employee from that
role? (actually I need to get all employees in that role and recreate... more »
|
|
Can anyone help me get my head around this use case?
|
| |
Ok..so I started playing with Edmund on Monday night!
My Deal:
I have a custom "factory" object which gets loaded up by coldspring
for each of my applications....
The factory creates/gets abstract services for ORM objects. Actually,
it's quite similar to approaches taken in Metro (metro.riaforge.org),... more »
|
|
Theory Question - abstracting the model with Edmund
|
| |
Is it a goal of event driven programming to "hide" the model from
application controllers? Give controllers the chance to use an
abstraction of the model, but not the model itself?
Meaning all actors (html/Flex controllers) just ask Edmund to "do"
things instead of exposing the real API methods of the application?... more »
|
|
Welcome new project member: Patrick Santora
|
| |
I'd like to extend a warm welcome to Patrick Santora who has been
working with Edmund and has been offering patches for a while. Patrick
is now officially a project member and contributor for Edmund (and my
other mini-projects such as Closures and Concurrency etc, should he
wish). Patrick has been working on Railo support for Edmund as well as... more »
|
|
Clarifications on how Edmund operates
|
| |
I was wondering if somebody could shed light on exactly how Edmund is
supposed to be used. I'll clarify my understanding of event-driven and
how I've seen it implemented first to give some background as to my
doubts. I'm more familiar with an Observer type pattern, where you can
extend an Observable class that has methods like addEvent(), fireEvent... more »
|
|
log it and email me
|
| |
If I want to use Edmund to not only log stuff but email me as well
where would I add the cfmail tags?
Thanks
|
|
jumping the gun
|
| |
Would it be too soon for me to lobby for using EDMUND in production?
Thanks
|
|
Edmund Philosophy
|
| |
I'm finishing off Fusebox 5.5 right now and will be turning my attention to Edmund starting next week (there is already some experimental code in SVN, under my org-corfield-cfmx project). In the mean time, I wanted to give you a little more background on my thinking. What is quoted below is a response I made to discussions on the... more »
|
|
|