Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Liberals to debate severing ties with the monarchy at upcoming convention
1 view
Skip to first unread message
snowman
Jan 4, 2012, 9:25:17 PM1/4/12
to
_Liberals to debate severing ties with the monarchy at upcoming convention_
Federal Liberals will be debating the merits of our monarchy in Ottawa,
next week, during their biennial convention.
A 'priority resolution' put forward by the youth wing of the party reads
as follows: "BE IT RESOLVED that the Liberal Party of Canada, urge the
Parliament of Canada to form an all part committee to study the
implementation of instituting a Canadian head of state popularly elected
and sever formal ties with the British Crown."
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/canada-politics/liberals-debate-severing-ties-monarchy-upcoming-convention-140650998.html
===================================
This is something that would certainly leave the Doctor in a quandry,
one would have to wonder if his affinity would be stronger for the
Monarchy or the Liberal party.
Personally, I hate this idea. The Liberal party have been instrumental
in systematically dismantling Canadian institutions, culture and history
while they were in power, this would be just one more abuse. Yet
another reason why one should avoid the Liberals, IMHO.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
"It's the customer's privilege to burst their own f*cking yolk."
-Gordon Ramsey
Federal Liberals will be debating the merits of our monarchy in Ottawa,
next week, during their biennial convention.
A 'priority resolution' put forward by the youth wing of the party reads
as follows: "BE IT RESOLVED that the Liberal Party of Canada, urge the
Parliament of Canada to form an all part committee to study the
implementation of instituting a Canadian head of state popularly elected
and sever formal ties with the British Crown."
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/canada-politics/liberals-debate-severing-ties-monarchy-upcoming-convention-140650998.html
===================================
This is something that would certainly leave the Doctor in a quandry,
one would have to wonder if his affinity would be stronger for the
Monarchy or the Liberal party.
Personally, I hate this idea. The Liberal party have been instrumental
in systematically dismantling Canadian institutions, culture and history
while they were in power, this would be just one more abuse. Yet
another reason why one should avoid the Liberals, IMHO.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
"It's the customer's privilege to burst their own f*cking yolk."
-Gordon Ramsey
John Fleming
Jan 4, 2012, 11:18:28 PM1/4/12
to
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:25:17 -0700, while chained to a desk
in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
> $_Liberals to debate severing ties with the monarchy at upcoming convention_
> $
> $Federal Liberals will be debating the merits of our monarchy in Ottawa,
> $next week, during their biennial convention.
> $
> $A 'priority resolution' put forward by the youth wing of the party reads
> $as follows: "BE IT RESOLVED that the Liberal Party of Canada, urge the
> $Parliament of Canada to form an all part committee to study the
> $implementation of instituting a Canadian head of state popularly elected
> $and sever formal ties with the British Crown."
> $
> $http://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/canada-politics/liberals-debate-severing-ties-monarchy-upcoming-convention-140650998.html
> $
> $===================================
> $
> $This is something that would certainly leave the Doctor in a quandry,
> $one would have to wonder if his affinity would be stronger for the
> $Monarchy or the Liberal party.
I suspect he is Liberal first and monarchist second.
> $Personally, I hate this idea. The Liberal party have been instrumental
> $in systematically dismantling Canadian institutions, culture and history
> $while they were in power, this would be just one more abuse. Yet
> $another reason why one should avoid the Liberals, IMHO.
At the same time, I think it demonstrates the strength of
our democratic system in that such a resolution can be
debated.
And I do like the way the Conservatives have worked to
strengthen some of our institutions. For example,
instructing Canadian embassies and consulates to hang
pictures of the Queen and returning "Royal" to the branches
of our armed forces.
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
> $_Liberals to debate severing ties with the monarchy at upcoming convention_
> $
> $Federal Liberals will be debating the merits of our monarchy in Ottawa,
> $next week, during their biennial convention.
> $
> $A 'priority resolution' put forward by the youth wing of the party reads
> $as follows: "BE IT RESOLVED that the Liberal Party of Canada, urge the
> $Parliament of Canada to form an all part committee to study the
> $implementation of instituting a Canadian head of state popularly elected
> $and sever formal ties with the British Crown."
> $
> $http://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/canada-politics/liberals-debate-severing-ties-monarchy-upcoming-convention-140650998.html
> $
> $===================================
> $
> $This is something that would certainly leave the Doctor in a quandry,
> $one would have to wonder if his affinity would be stronger for the
> $Monarchy or the Liberal party.
I suspect he is Liberal first and monarchist second.
> $Personally, I hate this idea. The Liberal party have been instrumental
> $in systematically dismantling Canadian institutions, culture and history
> $while they were in power, this would be just one more abuse. Yet
> $another reason why one should avoid the Liberals, IMHO.
At the same time, I think it demonstrates the strength of
our democratic system in that such a resolution can be
debated.
And I do like the way the Conservatives have worked to
strengthen some of our institutions. For example,
instructing Canadian embassies and consulates to hang
pictures of the Queen and returning "Royal" to the branches
of our armed forces.
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
The Doctor
Jan 5, 2012, 9:10:16 AM1/5/12
to
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k
Merry Christmas 2011 and Happy New Year 2012 !
The Doctor
Jan 5, 2012, 9:15:06 AM1/5/12
to
In article <tk8ag7pavqefu40aq...@4ax.com>,
Monarchist first Liberal second.
You missed the meeting on the wedding of William and KAte I see.
You missed the meeting on the wedding of William and KAte I see.
snowman
Jan 6, 2012, 9:11:04 PM1/6/12
to
On 05/01/2012 7:15 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>
> Monarchist first Liberal second.
>
Does that mean that you would leave the Liberal party under such
circumstances?
>
> Monarchist first Liberal second.
>
Does that mean that you would leave the Liberal party under such
circumstances?
John Fleming
Jan 6, 2012, 9:37:41 PM1/6/12
to
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:11:04 -0700, while chained to a desk
> $
> $> Monarchist first Liberal second.
> $
> $Does that mean that you would leave the Liberal party under such
> $circumstances?
His actions under such circumstances would tell us whether
or not he is teling the truth.
in the scriptorium snowman <x@x.x> wrote:
> $On 05/01/2012 7:15 AM, The Doctor wrote:
> $
> $> Monarchist first Liberal second.
> $
> $Does that mean that you would leave the Liberal party under such
> $circumstances?
His actions under such circumstances would tell us whether
or not he is teling the truth.
The Doctor
Jan 6, 2012, 11:09:00 PM1/6/12
to
In article <bubfg7l8v1ua1l62u...@4ax.com>,
You can check the relevant section of convention.liberal.ca for your
verification.
verification.
Loaf of Bread
Jan 9, 2012, 3:02:07 PM1/9/12
to
On Jan 6, 9:09 pm, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
> In article <bubfg7l8v1ua1l62u6dhcughbg5djn8...@4ax.com>,
the position *you* would take (other than horizontal in a whore
house).
> In article <bubfg7l8v1ua1l62u6dhcughbg5djn8...@4ax.com>,
> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:11:04 -0700, while chained to a desk
> >in the scriptorium snowman <x...@x.x> wrote:
> >> $On 05/01/2012 7:15 AM, The Doctor wrote:
> >> $
> >> $> Monarchist first Liberal second.
> >> $
> >> $Does that mean that you would leave the Liberal party under such
> >> $circumstances?
>
> >His actions under such circumstances would tell us whether
> >or not he is teling the truth.
>
I don't care what the Liberal propaganda says. We are talking about
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:11:04 -0700, while chained to a desk
> >in the scriptorium snowman <x...@x.x> wrote:
> >> $On 05/01/2012 7:15 AM, The Doctor wrote:
> >> $
> >> $> Monarchist first Liberal second.
> >> $
> >> $Does that mean that you would leave the Liberal party under such
> >> $circumstances?
>
> >His actions under such circumstances would tell us whether
> >or not he is teling the truth.
>
the position *you* would take (other than horizontal in a whore
house).
Loaf of Bread
Jan 9, 2012, 3:02:40 PM1/9/12
to
On Jan 5, 7:10 am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
> In article <4f050a12$0$5954$882e7...@usenet-news.net>, snowman <x...@x.x> wrote:
> >_Liberals to debate severing ties with the monarchy at upcoming convention_
>
> >Federal Liberals will be debating the merits of our monarchy in Ottawa,
> >next week, during their biennial convention.
>
> >A 'priority resolution' put forward by the youth wing of the party reads
> >as follows: "BE IT RESOLVED that the Liberal Party of Canada, urge the
> >Parliament of Canada to form an all part committee to study the
> >implementation of instituting a Canadian head of state popularly elected
> >and sever formal ties with the British Crown."
>
> >http://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/canada-politics/liberals-debate-severi...
> >_Liberals to debate severing ties with the monarchy at upcoming convention_
>
> >Federal Liberals will be debating the merits of our monarchy in Ottawa,
> >next week, during their biennial convention.
>
> >A 'priority resolution' put forward by the youth wing of the party reads
> >as follows: "BE IT RESOLVED that the Liberal Party of Canada, urge the
> >Parliament of Canada to form an all part committee to study the
> >implementation of instituting a Canadian head of state popularly elected
> >and sever formal ties with the British Crown."
>
>
> >===================================
>
> >This is something that would certainly leave the Doctor in a quandry,
> >one would have to wonder if his affinity would be stronger for the
> >Monarchy or the Liberal party.
>
> >Personally, I hate this idea. The Liberal party have been instrumental
> >in systematically dismantling Canadian institutions, culture and history
> >while they were in power, this would be just one more abuse. Yet
> >another reason why one should avoid the Liberals, IMHO.
>
> >--
> >--------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >"It's the customer's privilege to burst their own f*cking yolk."
>
> > -Gordon Ramsey
>
> This could get voted down.
Did it ever occur to you it might get voted for?
> >===================================
>
> >This is something that would certainly leave the Doctor in a quandry,
> >one would have to wonder if his affinity would be stronger for the
> >Monarchy or the Liberal party.
>
> >Personally, I hate this idea. The Liberal party have been instrumental
> >in systematically dismantling Canadian institutions, culture and history
> >while they were in power, this would be just one more abuse. Yet
> >another reason why one should avoid the Liberals, IMHO.
>
> >--
> >--------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >"It's the customer's privilege to burst their own f*cking yolk."
>
> > -Gordon Ramsey
>
> This could get voted down.
The Doctor
Jan 9, 2012, 6:19:05 PM1/9/12
to
In article <40b8f7fe-6419-427d...@k5g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,
Loaf of Bread <john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
toxic unwholesome white mouldy Loaf of Bread.
Loaf of Bread <john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Jan 6, 9:09=A0pm, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> In article <bubfg7l8v1ua1l62u6dhcughbg5djn8...@4ax.com>,
>> In article <bubfg7l8v1ua1l62u6dhcughbg5djn8...@4ax.com>,
>> John Fleming =A0<nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:11:04 -0700, while chained to a desk
>> >in the scriptorium snowman <x...@x.x> wrote:
>> >> $On 05/01/2012 7:15 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>> >> $
>> >> $> Monarchist first Liberal second.
>> >> $
>> >> $Does that mean that you would leave the Liberal party under such
>> >> $circumstances?
>>
>> >His actions under such circumstances would tell us whether
>> >or not he is teling the truth.
>>
>> You can check the relevant section of convention.liberal.ca for your
>> verification.
>
>I don't care what the Liberal propaganda says. We are talking about
>the position *you* would take (other than horizontal in a whore
>house).
Spews venomous anti-social anti-common-sense obnoxious mannerless
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:11:04 -0700, while chained to a desk
>> >in the scriptorium snowman <x...@x.x> wrote:
>> >> $On 05/01/2012 7:15 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>> >> $
>> >> $> Monarchist first Liberal second.
>> >> $
>> >> $Does that mean that you would leave the Liberal party under such
>> >> $circumstances?
>>
>> >His actions under such circumstances would tell us whether
>> >or not he is teling the truth.
>>
>> You can check the relevant section of convention.liberal.ca for your
>> verification.
>
>I don't care what the Liberal propaganda says. We are talking about
>the position *you* would take (other than horizontal in a whore
>house).
toxic unwholesome white mouldy Loaf of Bread.
The Doctor
Jan 9, 2012, 6:22:00 PM1/9/12
to
In article <a0ef4632-eb2d-42d0...@cs7g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
>> In article <4f050a12$0$5954$882e7...@usenet-news.net>, snowman =A0<x...@x=
>.x> wrote:
>> >_Liberals to debate severing ties with the monarchy at upcoming conventi=
>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Loaf of Bread <john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Jan 5, 7:10=A0am, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>> In article <4f050a12$0$5954$882e7...@usenet-news.net>, snowman =A0<x...@x=
>.x> wrote:
>> >_Liberals to debate severing ties with the monarchy at upcoming conventi=
>on_
>>
>> >Federal Liberals will be debating the merits of our monarchy in Ottawa,
>> >next week, during their biennial convention.
>>
>> >A 'priority resolution' put forward by the youth wing of the party reads
>> >as follows: "BE IT RESOLVED that the Liberal Party of Canada, urge the
>> >Parliament of Canada to form an all part committee to study the
>> >implementation of instituting a Canadian head of state popularly elected
>> >and sever formal ties with the British Crown."
>>
>> >http://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/canada-politics/liberals-debate-severi...
>>
>> >=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
>>
>> >Federal Liberals will be debating the merits of our monarchy in Ottawa,
>> >next week, during their biennial convention.
>>
>> >A 'priority resolution' put forward by the youth wing of the party reads
>> >as follows: "BE IT RESOLVED that the Liberal Party of Canada, urge the
>> >Parliament of Canada to form an all part committee to study the
>> >implementation of instituting a Canadian head of state popularly elected
>> >and sever formal ties with the British Crown."
>>
>> >http://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/canada-politics/liberals-debate-severi...
>>
>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>>
>> >This is something that would certainly leave the Doctor in a quandry,
>> >one would have to wonder if his affinity would be stronger for the
>> >Monarchy or the Liberal party.
>>
>> >Personally, I hate this idea. =A0The Liberal party have been instrumenta=
>> >This is something that would certainly leave the Doctor in a quandry,
>> >one would have to wonder if his affinity would be stronger for the
>> >Monarchy or the Liberal party.
>>
>l
>> >in systematically dismantling Canadian institutions, culture and history
>> >while they were in power, this would be just one more abuse. =A0Yet
>> >in systematically dismantling Canadian institutions, culture and history
>> >another reason why one should avoid the Liberals, IMHO.
>>
>> >--
>> >--------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> >"It's the customer's privilege to burst their own f*cking yolk."
>>
>> > =A0 =A0 =A0 -Gordon Ramsey
>>
>> >--
>> >--------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> >"It's the customer's privilege to burst their own f*cking yolk."
>>
>>
>> This could get voted down.
>
>Did it ever occur to you it might get voted for?
Check liberal.ca , So far 4:1 against.
>> This could get voted down.
>
>Did it ever occur to you it might get voted for?
0 new messages