Received: by 10.101.20.6 with SMTP id x6mr145549ani.2.1315404670908;
        Wed, 07 Sep 2011 07:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: eclim-user@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.90.22.16 with SMTP id 16ls6606208agv.7.gmail; Wed, 07 Sep 2011
 07:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.91.160.40 with SMTP id m40mr1070137ago.2.1315404670407; Wed,
 07 Sep 2011 07:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by d25g2000yqh.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 07:11:10
 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 07:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110907140636.GT29244@cartman.gateway.2wire.net>
References: <7d05e742-f409-402e-86ed-99fa01efa51b@g31g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
 <20110907140636.GT29244@cartman.gateway.2wire.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like
 Gecko) Chrome/13.0.782.220 Safari/535.1,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <80b37239-c308-4638-9498-d8db023448c9@d25g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Vim shows less validation errors and suggested fixes than in
 eclipse itself
From: Tom <adatgyu...@gmail.com>
To: eclim-user <eclim-user@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Sep 7, 4:06=A0pm, Eric Van Dewoestine <ervan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> As for :JavaCorrect results, eclim currently filters out corrections
> that that change a file other than the current one because applying a
> correction can't be done the typical way in eclim since eclipse's
> correction proposal code is very heavily tied to the UI. As a work
> around eclim simply replaces the current file's content with the
> toString result of the proposal chosen, which causes problems if the
> proposals content is intended for a different file.

Why not let Eclipse do the corrections then and return the list of
affected