> I believe that's the right path to follow, the idea of .js is great for the other hand is a disaster like you said. Everybody pronounce dynjs and not dyn dot js :)

> The links will break, then we'll fix it this is how opensource works. Let's do it.

> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Douglas Campos <q...@qmx.me> wrote:
> After deep thought, I admit that the idea of having a .js sounded neat, but on real world is a disaster.

> I propose to remove the dot from the project (as the organization is dynjs, the site is dynjs, like, everything on this earth doesn't have the dot, except the github repo)

> after renaming on github, old links break, so we would need to create a dyn.js empty repository with a "moved to message"

> the proposed changes are at => https://github.com/dynjs/dyn.js/tree/maven_shuffle/

> Thoughts?

> -- qmx

> --
> "Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively" - Dalai Lama XIV
> -
> @abstractj
> -
> Volenti Nihil Difficile