During the call, people reported that the DF-on-DF weekend generated a beneficial sense of community, a community-of-practice. The face-to-face element was important in this, and also the opportunity to see different styles of doing DF, as facilitation rotated among the participants. This gave participants a sense of being embedded in a dynamic, evolving community of practice. During the call, the question arose as to what could be done, new websites or whatever, to build on and share this sense of community.
DeAnna has already created a 'ning' network, Choice Creating Community of Practice. This seems like an appropriate environment for building a sense of community. It's got forums, a chat facility, pages for each member with a 'wall' to write on, email notification of updates, etc. If one of the forum discussions gets 'hot', it would be relatively easy for the participants to agree on a time to transition over to the real-time chat window. And it is easy to copy and paste from the chat, back into the forum, as a record of key points to share.
If we want to develop our working community, perhaps what is needed is the collective intention to use the ning environment as a primary means of our group communication. We'd need to devote some initial energy to get the momentum going, and establish the environment as an 'active, inhabited space'. A place where we post our reports on events, where we upload our videos, etc.