Re: Tariff Increase -12-13 - State sponsored fleecing of Consumers - Re: Tariff Hike order on Petition No.(s) 03/2012, 04/2012, 05/2012 and 05/2012

21 views
Skip to first unread message

REJIMON C K

unread,
Jun 27, 2012, 4:21:31 AM6/27/12
to DWARKA FORUM
For Input and if Dwarkites wanted to raise this issue of hike? Please ...not for the sake of blogging but if one have good intention. Please connect.

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Anil Sood <anil...@spchetna.com> wrote:



The aforesaid orders have come to us rude shocks. Unfortunately the Commission while mandated to protect the interests of both the Industry and the Consumers, is in fact working only in favour of the DISCOMS and has completely ignored the Consumers. This is evident from the following facts:-


a)            The DISCOMS had been always getting the Capex Approved which forms a part of the ARR Tariff Petition.


b)            Pursuant to our objections last year as communicated during two meetings of the State Advisory Committee, where I was present, Commission has appointed Institute of Chartered Accountants of India to conduct physical verification of Assets from 2002 to 2006 and also engaged another agency for conducting the physical verification of assets purchased by DISCOMS from 2007 onwards;


c)            This physical verification of assets was necessitated in view of the observation by team of Auditors that the Asset Register is not being maintained;


d)            The Commission has also mandated the Institute of Chartered Accountant of India to suggest a format wherein the Financial accounts could be reconciled with regulatory accounts on the grounds that Commission is not is not in a position to reconcile both the accounts and arrive at a considered view.


Therefore, in view of the aforesaid as a Member of State Advisory Committee fail to understand that once Commission is in no capacity to reconcile the Financial accounts with 

Regulatory accounts, how the loss level of the DISCOMS has been determined. Further, I had also placed on record the Data published by Power Finance Corporation that

indicates that all the three DISCOMS have made profits . There cannot be two Balance Sheets one for the purposes on Income Tax and another for the purposes of DERC.

 

Loss Reduction benefit : Additionally, we had also placed on record that the savings due to reduction of    loss level have not translated into reduction of tariff as assured by the DISCOMS and GNCT of Delhi from day one.

 

Inflated Bills:     Common neutral : We had also placed on record the BIS Standards that mandated the DISCOMS to ensure separate Neutral  for each single phase connection to eliminate the recording of consumption without actually supplying  power to Consumers leading to inflated bills. Unfortunately the Commission has washed off its hands merely by issuing an advertisement in paper.

Supply & Performance Standards: It is a matter of record that since 2005 onwards the Commission had been all along assuring the Supply and Performance Standard would ensure fair treatment to the Consumers. Unfortunately the Commission has accepted the Supply and performance standards as and when demanded by DISCOMS but  till date no steps have been taken that are in the interest of Consumers- Erratic power supply – absence of Absolute Earth Potential.

 

Higher Power Purchase cost: We have placed on record the Data available in public domain evidencing that the DISCOMS claim of high cost of purchase of power was a false statement. Commission though seized of the fact did not consider it fit to investigate the matter.

 

Therefore, in view of the aforesaid facts I have reasonable apprehension that the order has been passed

without application of mind. It is equally surprising when CAG can Audit private firms on its own in

contravention to its constitution itself for the purposes of Service tax, how and why despite so much of

hue and cry the CAG is still silent and did not take up the Audit of the DISCOMS on its own or why the

Government did not request CAG to take up and complete the Audit of the DISCOMS, despite

announcement by CM, Delhi.


--
Anil Sood
Hony President - CHETNA
Member State Advisory Committee (DERC)
A 417-418, Somdutt Chamber -1
5 Bhikajicama Place,
New Delhi.
Cell. 9810558696

Web site: www.spchetna.com

Blog; www.enlightendcitizenry.blogspot.com

The donations to the Society are exempt from Income Tax under Section 80 G of Income Tax vide order No. DIT(E)/2009-2010/S-2560/1399 dated 2nd September, 2009 from 01-04-09 onwards.




--
REJIMON C K.
Sent over wireless Network ... Google Nexus Phone.

swa...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 27, 2012, 4:23:21 AM6/27/12
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel

From: REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:51:31 +0530
Subject: [Dwarka Forum] Re: Tariff Increase -12-13 - State sponsored fleecing of Consumers - Re: Tariff Hike order on Petition No.(s) 03/2012, 04/2012, 05/2012 and 05/2012
--
Note:
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to Dwarka-residen...@googlegroups.com

Sudhir Kalra

unread,
Jun 27, 2012, 6:17:26 AM6/27/12
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Dear friends,

We deserve the Governance the way we select our leaders!

I am sure each one of us so called from Educated strata of society spend more time & effort in evaluating a maid/plumber/electrician for petty jobs than evaluating the people who are supposed to Govern the State or our country for that matter.

Our highly learned CM has been shouting from the rooftops since last so many weeks the tariff has to go up substantially and lo and behold our learned regulators simply complied, CM knows the best.

So what has come to us was expected and  we deserve it.

As regards CAG Audit, yes it will be done once a suitable (read pliable) CAG takes over, after all it is a gigantic task to sift black from black (no grey areas ) and no ordinary CAG can do that. 

Sudhir Kalra
Advocate

Mahendra Kumar Gupta

unread,
Jun 27, 2012, 10:50:40 AM6/27/12
to dwarka-r...@googlegroups.com
Yes, this was about the hike in electricity bills.  For behives, new tag should have been created but it seems the sender has changed the subject tag.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages