Re: Fw: Service/Slip Roads on NH-8 ON DELHI-GURAGAON EXPRESS LINK and demand immediate action.
REJIMON C K
Once work starts then only we can trust these ppl
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 3:25 PM, purshotam behl <jaipu...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
JAIPUR AUTO SERVICE
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: "Rajawat V.K , GM(Tech.)" <vkra...@nhai.org>
To: purshotam behl <jaipu...@yahoo.co.in>
Sent: Thu, 13 January, 2011 10:13:20 AM
Subject: RE: Service/Slip Roads on NH-8 ON DELHI-GURAGAON EXPRESS LINK and demand immediate action.
The estimate for construction of service road from Rajokri to Palam on RHS has been received from Project Director, Gurgaon and tender is being invited shortly by end of January, which includes improvement of Kapashera junction.
Regards
GM(T)
From: purshotam behl [mailto:jaipu...@yahoo.co.in]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 10:39 PM
To: REJIMON C K
Cc: Rajawat V.K , GM (Tech.)
Subject: Re: Service/Slip Roads on NH-8 ON DELHI-GURAGAON EXPRESS LINK and demand immediate action.
Sir,
we ,all from Dwarka expect from NHAI some immidate action ,on these service roads ,and an Intersection at kapashera Junction
which have been delayed since 2004. kindly convey the future programes of NHAI on the subject.
Purshotam Behl.
9811113809.
(President),RWA sect-8, Dwarka.
Rajimon ji,
recieved the reply of NHAI as under.
Purshotam Behl
From: REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com>
To: " Rajawat V.K , GM (Tech.)" <vkra...@nhai.org>
Cc: purshotam behl <jaipu...@yahoo.co.in>
Sent: Wed, 12 January, 2011 1:09:53 PM
Subject: Re: Service/Slip Roads on NH-8 ON DELHI-GURAGAON EXPRESS LINK and demand immediate action.Sir,
Will we able to see light of the Project of service road this year ?
We noticed between Entry 18 exit 20(Rajokri and Dwarka Link Road0 some private builders on the adjacent plots pouring earth to connect directly to NH8. I am sure this is with NHAI permission only and then they will go for court stay for service road ?
Rejimon
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Rajawat V.K , GM (Tech.) <vkra...@nhai.org> wrote:
Sir,
It is to clarify that the work which is on going is not that of service road rather Construction of drain by Delhi PWD. The estimate for service road is under preparation at Project Director Office at Gurgaon.
Regards
GM(T)
From: purshotam behl [mailto:jaipu...@yahoo.co.in]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 9:23 PM
To: REJIMON C K
Cc: Rajawat V.K , GM (Tech.); Rana Chitra , PS
Subject: Re: Service/Slip Roads on NH-8 ON DELHI-GURAGAON EXPRESS LINK and demand immediate action.
Rajimon Ji,
Today , evening ,I have seen that DSC have started , this service lane ,but near Domestic Airport ,. LH side /Airport side, but it has been started , from the other end , where it is not required urgently, see the working of NHAI , which seems to be anti public demand.
We have been asking ,for taking up the service Road , opposite , Satvir Service Station , but all in Deaf Ears.
Purshotam Behl.
09811113809
From: REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com>
To: "Rana Chitra , PS" <chitr...@nhai.org>; " Rajawat V.K , GM (Tech.)" <vkra...@nhai.org>; "Pillai K.V, GM (LA)" <pill...@nhai.org>
Cc: purshotam behl <jaipu...@yahoo.co.in>; "Col Gujral, VK, Farm-Exp-LinkRdUSG" <u...@bird.in>
Sent: Wed, 13 October, 2010 5:11:29 PM
Subject: Re: Service/Slip Roads on NH-8 ON DELHI-GURAGAON EXPRESS LINK and demand immediate action.Here is the letter and self explanatory.
Rejimon
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Brij Sharma Manager (IT) <bmsh...@nhai.org> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:20 AM, <fo...@nhai.asia> wrote:
Complaint Registration <fo...@nhai.asia>
---------------------------------------------------------
Complaint ID : RS#2569
Complaint Related to : Road Safety
Your Complaint has been registered successfully.
---------------------------------------------------------
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:10 AM, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr. VK Singh/Mr. Rajawat,,
Kindly allow me to refer our email dated 18/3/2010.
Why our grivience not considered under rule 122 of Manual of Office Procere and CCS Conduct Rule ?
What stops the NHAI in building the SERVICE LANE ?
I think you have no intention to reply or comply.. I fthat the be case we will at least now going to use RTI to get records/information in this regard.
Rejimon
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:40 AM, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr. V K Singh/ Mr. Rajawat,
Kindly allow me to refer to letter of Mr. V K Singh vid ref No. NHAI/Tech/Del-Gur/NH-8/RTI/9713 dated 22/1/2010.
We observed this week the PWD have made access to Land which NHAI claims wtill with AAI and will be made available for Service Lane and widening of NH8.
1. How come PWD got an access to this land where NHAI already working and as per design and project for Service road.
2. If the PWD makes a Drainage lanes, will NHAI be able to do what it promised 20 meter widening ?
The Lack of Servie Lanes are still causing problem this week also reported one more biker met with accident and probably lost life, before the Radisson Flyover. Mr. Singh do you have a response on the service lane. Do you suggest we need to approach apex court for justice to protect the safety of commuters?
The Petrol Pump before Dwarka Link Road after Rajokri Flyover is causing serious risk as it is allowed to open access from many points by NHAI.
We are also requesting UTTIPEC(in copy) to look into this aspect in connection with Project No.8 proposed.
We appreciate your response this matter at the earliest.
Thanking you,
Rejimon C K
on behalf of Dwarka Forum(Regd).
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rana Chitra , PS <chitr...@nhai.org>
Date: Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:54 AM
Subject: FW: FW: COMPLAINT AGAINST NHAI-NH-8 ON DELHI-GURAGAON EXPRESS LINK and demand enquiry
To: " Rajawat V.K , GM (Tech.)" <vkra...@nhai.org>
Cc: reji...@gmail.comSir,
A mail received from Shri Rejimon CK raising some queries on the reply sent by Shri KV Singh, DGM (CWG) vide letter No. 9713 dated 21/22.01.2010 is forwarded herewith.
It is requested to re-examine the matter and reply suitably to the petitioner directly. A copy of the same may please be endorsed to the PG cell for record.
regards
Vijay Shankar V
Director (Public Grievances) &
DGM (Coord.)
-----Original Message-----
From: REJIMON C K [mailto:reji...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 5:13 PM
To: Rana Chitra , PS; Vijay Shankar V. , DGM (Admin. & Coord.); Pillai K.V, GM (LA); Jindal SC , CGM (T) -SCJ; Singh Brijeshwar
Cc: Rajawat V.K , GM (Tech.); purshotam behl; skah...@gmail.com; Kamal Nath
Subject: Re: FW: COMPLAINT AGAINST NHAI-NH-8 ON DELHI-GURAGAON EXPRESS LINK and demand enquiryMr. K V Singh
Dy. GM (CWG)
NHAI
New Delhi
Mr. K V Singh,
Thank you for your reply after 3 months of long delay and DPG intervention.
Your reply can be quoted in two lines
“ A Govt Staff paid from Tax Payers advocating for Private Consortium called Jaypee DSC which runs Delhi-Gurgaon Expressway”.
- Ref Para 1: We would happy to put precise questions and precise comments- Will post comment and question by end of this communication and also separately. Please ensure you answer that.
- Q.1 You have stated “The Jam on that day is PERHAPS due to accident”
- I hope Mr. Singh you have some sense of responsibility and sense of humanitarian approach. We have addressed issue on the vital loss of human life that was the prime important part of that grievance email. You don’t value human it seems. Probably across the National Highway you may be getting every day reports of loss of human life? and it won’t affect you?
- The traffic jam on the Radisson Flyover is ROUTINE PHENOMENON. If you need to proof there is no such routine phenomenon. Please provide us the video and pictures for the portion from Rajokri-Link-Road till Raddisson underpass for the month of December 2009 and January 2010. We are ready with our proofs. If you don’t provide us proof that will be proved beyond doubt that you are telling TRUE LIES at the behest of Jaypee DSC. If any of the commuter want to make complaint on the displayed no. 014-2450800,, Do you think they register and record the complaints? We have enough reason to believe that even a peon of NHAI would not be checking those complaints and monitor them. We know there are many corrupt officials in NHAI. For your records I just attaché photographs of traffic piled up from Radisson till Rajokri and on Dwarka Link road a usual scene.
- If you have not lost the reading capability a simple question we put which you may have intentionally not replied “WHO OWNS RESPONSIBILITY”. The email of 8/10/2009 addressed to PM of this Country of your(NHAI) behaviour.
- It also demanded enquiry against NHAI based on TOI [1]report that report based on Corporate affairs Ministry report. You have no answer to this ? Its not an allegation by lay man like us. This in addition to what MRTP report. No reference to our email dated 26/8/2009?
Q 2 & 3. We appreciate your genuine response and understanding the MPD2021. So in your official response the MPD2021 is still in DRAFT stage and not notified yet?
- We whole heartily compliment NHAI proposal to increase ROW to 100M. The question remain unanswered among us is that now who will part 20 meter on each side with private farms, hotels and commercial establishments.
- You even failed to remove those big advertising hoarding all along highway causing distraction to drivers and invites accident and even court directed, but you failed to act.
- Concerning service roads: Mr. K V Singh, have you ever travelled on NH-8 Express Link between Delhi and Gurgaon Border ? Your answer tells that you never travelled. There is no service road from Rajokri flyover till Link Road ( Old Delhi-Gurgaon Road or connecting road to Dwarka). This portion is left to help whom ? Do you think we don’t know ?
- Agreed service road portion from Link road till Palam flyover not been able to build because of AAI and Defence not handing over. Will you publish relevant documents including meetings with them(AAI & Defence) on your website ? As absence of service road is causing deaths, NHAI not own that it must be AAI and Defence Ministry. Why don’t you disclose that to public through your website. Also the same area that is with AAI as claimed by you used in the past by the contractor during the construction period? Now not available to public(the area outside boundry walls?
- You have very smartly disowned the responsibility and put Two wheeler/Three Wheelers. You talk of discipline of others what about your own discipline. You need how many reminder to respond to a letter. Mr. K V Singh are you following all the rules that set by Ministry of Transport& Highways, Ministry of Personal, Ministry of Administrative Reforms and CVC ? An introspection may be desired. We are not saying that the 2/3 wheelers are not using the main roads and flyover. Why they are using, have the NHAI/Jaypee DSC tried to educate them, guide them by posting few more guards at intervals ? Yes there are guard’s stands on both side of the roads at long distance. Just call any one of them and ask them what they suppose to do. Have they been briefed ? Have they been trained ? Are the service roads are free traffic moments ? At any given day you will find trucks or commercial vehicles parked. At some places where marriage functions the visitors cars are parked or in market area like Mahipalpur and Rangpuri the service lane is being used as parking place , by Hotels , and car repair Roadside shops, mere remain less than one lane. Have you taken action in coordination with Traffic and Local Police ?
- We really appreciate solution can by find if TRIED : Get Delhi Police/Gurgaon Police and guards keep one stretch in one week regularise at every interval and divert, guide and monitor all 2/3 wheelers. Give proper visibility of those restriction warnings 2/3 wheeler from main road with pictures. If not able to achieve 100%, we are quite sure if sincerely put efforts at least 70% of them will be using the service road. Also to be ensured the service lanes are kept free for smooth traffic.
- The allegation of commuters entering tag line found no sanctity and vogue. You may kindly check the Video camera installed at toll plaza. There are huge lanes even on 26th Jan 2010 (being national holiday) on cash lane, where as the Tag lane had very few and I have noticed not a single one violating cash lane and trying to enter through Tag. Yes, there may have occasions when commuters got frustrated or due to emergency used tag lane instead of cash as the cash lane had huge lane. Just check the records of cash collection and movement of tag, you will lot of disparity in terms of volume there is not many counters. Even you will find tag users are waiting on Que and lane. The concessionaire in proportion to traffic the cash lane have less counter. Also look at heavy OVER LOADED Commercial Vehicles are allowed to the same toll plaza violating and inviting contempt of court direction on overloading and restriction on heavy vehicles. There are No Separate Lanes for Commercial Vehicles . Also all these Commercial vehicles Should Not be allowed to Enter This Expressway during the Peak Hours. Instead of asking concessionaire to facilitate you are trying to justify and advocate for concessionaire. Are you been paid by Contractor or by Govt? Your letter also look like drafted by some staffs from Jay Pee DSC as if. You start blaming the commuters for evening and NO WRONG on your NHAI and Concessionaire part. Are you sincere?
- Whether the concessionaire is allowed to collect toll with Provisional Completion Certificate need to be answered before MRTP and Ministry of Corporate affairs and may be further in some courts. With word Provisional, we found no legal reason to agree that concessionaire allowed to collect and what happen to collected amount etc.
- Foot over bridges: In Delhi area there is only 2 foot over bridge(1 at Toll ends in Subrato Park and one in Palam Flyover) For which also concessionaire getting huge amount from renting out for Mobile Towers etc . There must be one more FOB near Shiv Moorty also in some other places.
- The credibility of RITES-Sheladia will be only known in this matter if detailed investigation are done by some agency. On what condition the final certificate is given is still not known. There are many uncompleted work. Do you have list of uncompleted works ? if you could share with us then we will be able to give our inputs.
Q 4 Mr. K V Singh do you think ,we are kids ? We know the scope and area of operation etc very well. The traffic jam on Link road is due to piled up traffic on NH-8 from Radisson till Shivmurthy and some time till Rajokri Flyover. Earlier it was more because as rightly mentioned in your response the Kapasehra junction smooth merging have worked. We thank you for the same and we appreciate the speedy response after I spoke to one of your official. Q. 5. Mr. Singh How many petrol pumps are there on Delhi stretch ? You have NO CLUE where this particular stretch or location? There is saying that love and money make a man blind. Anyway we are talking specifically about the service road from Rajokri Flyover side till Link Road (Kapasehra –Old- Delhi - Gurgaon Road –Dwarka-Road junction). Are there any problem of land acquisition in this part ? Whose land is along and outside the barricade portion of the existing NH-8 ? Please don’t put words into our mouth Mr. Singh. Do you have service road from Entry No 18 (Rajokri Flyover SIDE road to exit No 20 (near Petrol Pump) toward Dwarka-Link Road .
- The speed are high than prescribed. How many speed limit boards have kept by concessionaire on the Delhi-stretch ?Could you give us some idea ? The speeding of vehicle is certainly restricted as per CMV Act. Any violation to that the Traffic Police need to take action. We are also in touch with Spl. CP and Jt. CP Traffic in this stretch traffic matter.
Well its Detailed Project Report and Projection by RITES need in-depth study and we will try to get citizens who may have knowledge to study and comment in the later stage also awaits other enquiries. It is also pertain to mention recently the concessionaire sought compensation from Delhi Govt for building tunnel road for Airport. Whereas we noticed the existing toll includes possible toll leakage. We would like to know the details. If NHAI disclose the complete contract, it would help the public at large to study and make precise violation of contractor. Why NHAI is not disclosing the contract under suomoto declaration of Section 4 of RTI Act 2005 is not known yet. What are the other revenue sharing agreement with contractor? What is % of so called UNDISCIPLINED commuters ? Not a single word on concessionaire lack of Toll lanes and facilities. We would like to know how many NHAI officials private vehicles have Tag? Or free access. Have any of you travelled and experienced the problem of the commuters ? Have any of you interacted with commuters ? Have you put suggestion box and centralised complaint number of NHAI for grievance ? Have you displayed email/telephone/fax and officially paid mobile numbers for commuters to contact in case of grievance and problem ? We may agree that the scarcity of tag may have resolved but % of majority are cash lane, who are ignored, ill treated and discriminated and even abused by your own letters confirms. This is not expected and not desired from officials who take salary from exchequer. Regarding RTI: The Relevant portion of appeal u/s 19(2) is already with CIC as well as Complaint U/s 18 of RTI Act 2005. The info sought specially on Q No. 2 on contract agreement as it have larger impact and public need to know. Hiding the same is only helping the contractor not the country and its people. You will also noted that the RTI filed on 31/3/2009 The reply was well over delayed and was on 8/5/09 and partial. Even FAA not given hearing opportunity nor considered in spirit the appeal u/s 19(1) of RTI Act 2005. No response received to email dated 23/6/09 following FAA order. We still don’t know what is the pending work on this road. At least we think there are many. Look at the shabby look of the highway, initially there were huge announcement of green along, now there is very few.
We would like to know the following at the earliest :
- The existing court cases against NHAI or Jaypee DSC concerning the operation of this express link.
- The complete contract with Concessionaire through NHAI website for public. The public have right to know what exactly the contract and list of items and relevant details to cross verify any deficiency.
- Present enquiries by which are the institutions and if reports received publish them under sue Moto declaration and ensuring transparency.
- List of staffs in NHAI Delhi operation with over 3 years in the current location violating the CVC circular.
- Have all the officials of the NHAI submitted their annual assets to NHAI Personal Administration.
- What action NHAI is going to initiate , for widening of this NH-8 portion in Delhi , and when?
- When NHAI have asked the Delhi govt. for acquit ion of the Desired 20 meters land on each side , to make it 100 Mtrs wide.
- When NHAI is going to ask DSC to put cameras for checking the over speeding vehicles and stop the Entry of Overloaded Commercial vehicles , on this stretch.
- Have you implemented water harvesting on this stretch ?
We hope you will respond to this email.
Rejimon CK
Hon. Citizen and President of Dwarka Forum(Regd)
[1] http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/news/city/delhi/Gurgaon-e-way-cant-yet-collect-toll-Govt-report/articleshow/4934505.cms
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 3:05 PM, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr. Vijay Shanakr,
The email dated 6 Jan 09 received from your PS Ms. Rana Chitra have any santity or is it another coverup and delay tactics?
Regards,
Rejimon CK
File Copy for RTI Application Drafts for NHAI
File Copy for Court File.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Rana Chitra , PS <chitr...@nhai.org> wrote:
Reminder
Sir,
The grievance of Shri Rejimon CK, received through MoRT&H letter No. I-34016/1/2009-O&M dated 28.10.2009, was earlier forwarded to you vide our note No. 229 dated 4th November 2009 for redressal. As the grievance is still pending at your end, it is reqeusted to kindly redress the grievance at the earliest and send the reply directly to the petitioner intimating the PG Cell.
Regards
Vijay Shankar V
Director (PG)
-----Original Message-----
From: Vijay Shankar V. , DGM (Admin. & Coord.)
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 5:45 PM
To: Rana Chitra , PS
Subject: FW: COMPLAINT AGAINST NHAI-NH-8 ON DELHI-GURAGAON EXPRESS LINK and demand enquiry
From: REJIMON C K [mailto:reji...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 12:13 PM
To: US-Cabinet Secretariat-DPG; Pillai K.V, GM (LA); Vijay Shankar V. , DGM (Admin. & Coord.); Secretary-MRTAH
Cc: Imanjeet Singh Bawa; purshotam behl
Subject: Re: COMPLAINT AGAINST NHAI-NH-8 ON DELHI-GURAGAON EXPRESS LINK and demand enquiry
Mr. Yogesh Gupta
Mr. K V Pillai
Mr. Vijay Shankar
Secretary-MRTAH
Sir,
Allow me to refer my eamil dated 27 Nov 09.
I haven't received any response nor out come of the compliant forwarded by DPG.
I would much appreciate you let me know the outcome as early as possible.
In case this communication is to be treated as an application under the Right to Information Act 2005 for the requested information, I may kindly be informed accordingly to enable me to make payment.
Information is requested based on the same available with MCD and public authority.--
Regards,
Rejimon C K.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:11 AM, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Mr. Yogesh Gupta(US/DPG),
Please refer to your letter dated 16/10/2009 concerning Ref Nop DPG/V/2009/00005(2)MRTAH. I am regret to infom you the outcome is nothing but passing the buck. Like post office the letter moves from one to other, wasting paper, time and most importanly resource.
I am sorry to ask:
Dont you think your letter not even valued of a TOILET PAPER by our govt staffs at Ministry of Transport, NHAI ?
Does it also means the Directorate of Public Grievance have no teething power?
We would much appreciate you clarify the above.
Thanking you,
Rejimon C K.
President-Dwarka Forum(Regd).
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:02 AM, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
Shri. Vijay Shankar
DGM(Adm & Coord)
Sir,
We hope this grievance letter will further transferred like a post office and look forward receiving concerted response/action.
Regards,
Rejimon CK
Dwarka Forum.
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Pillai K.V, GM (LA) <pill...@nhai.org> wrote:
Mr. Rejimon.CK
President-Dwarka Forum(Regd)
Sir,
Your letter on the subject received from the Ministry of RTH has been forwarded to
Shri Vijay Shankar, DGM(Admin) & Director (Public Grievances), NHAI
for needful action.
Yours faithfully
KV Pillai
GM(LA)
From: REJIMON C K [mailto:reji...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 3:52 PM
To: Singh Brijeshwar ; Pillai K.V, GM (LA)
Cc: purshotam behl
Subject: Fwd: COMPLAINT AGAINST NHAI-NH-8 ON DELHI-GURAGAON EXPRESS LINK and demand enquiry
Shri. K V Pillai(DG Admin)
NHAI
Dwarka,
Mr. Pillai,
Please find enclosed the letter from Ministry of Road Transport and Highways.
Appreciate your office will respond to this at the earliest.
Thanking you,
Rejimon C K
President-Dwarka Forum(Regd).
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:20 PM
Subject: Fwd: COMPLAINT AGAINST NHAI-NH-8 ON DELHI-GURAGAON EXPRESS LINK and demand enquiry
To: "Secretary, Ministry of Transport & Highways" <tran...@nic.in>, Kamal Nath <na...@sansad.nic.in>, "Mahadeo Singh Khandela,MoS" <tran...@nic.in>, "Ratanjit PN Singh,MoS" <rpn....@nic.in>
Cc: chai...@nhai.orgTo:
Secretary
Ministry of Road Transport & Highways
Tranpport Bhawan
1 Parliament street
New Delhi
Sir,
Kindly allow me to refer to letter dated 16/10/2009 from Shri. Yogesh Gupta , US , Directorage of Public Grievances, Cabinet Secretariat, GOI.
Ref Nop DPG/V/2009/00005(2)MRTAH.
Through vide letter my complaint is transferred to you.
Kindly provide with your reply and action taken report as directed by DPG.
Thanking you,
Rejimon C K.
Dwarka Forum.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com>Date: Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: COMPLAINT AGAINST NHAI-NH-8 ON DELHI-GURAGAON EXPRESS LINK and demand enquiryTo: Man Mohan Singh PM <pm...@pmo.nic.in>, Saibal Sarkar Dy Scy PG PMO <saibal...@nic.in>
Today 8th Oct 09 the NH8 on Radisson flyover jammed on both side.
Again there is fatal accident of biker. DEAD BODY is lying on the road.
WHO OWNS RESPONSIBILITY?
It's SHAME and Govt is not taking any action against NHAI and Contractor DSC.
Rejimon C K
President - Dwarka ForumOn 8/26/09, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sir, In addition.
> This media reports dated 26/8/2009 confirms the MRTPS findings.
> http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/news/city/delhi/Gurgaon-e-way-cant-yet-collect-toll-Govt-report/articleshow/4934505.cms
>
> Appreciate immediate enquiry against NAHI officials.
> Thanking you,
>
> Rejimon
>
>
> On 8/26/09, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hon. Prime Minister,
>>
>> We keep listening from govt through media/webiste/news about
>> infrastructure.
>>
>> *Have a look* on National Capital Delhis connecting * National Highway
>> No.8
>> *which were given to *Private Public Partnership called Delhi-Gurgaon
>> Super Express Link*.
>> Every day the commuters have really horrible experience of SNAIL Movement
>> of Traffic and Jams on Main Highway which is less than 90mtr(as
>> prescribed
>> in MPD 2021). A good number of Service roads are not completed, including
>> flyovers/footover bridge etc. The concessionaries are collecting
>> Tolls(based
>> on wrong project by RITES) irrespective of service deficiency and on
>> temproary completion certificate, . The regulatory authorities the NHAI
>> keeps a BLIND EYE,why they doing so, probably the anti corruption
>> department
>> of CBI will have answer if looked into.MRTP probe confirms the
>> irregularities.
>>
>> With much fanfare the road opened and huge collection of tolls by private
>> player on wrong projection.
>> Prima facie it is evident there is alleged corruption and nexus between
>> NHAI and private player.
>>
>> May we request your good office to order or ask CBI anti corruption
>> department to monitor/observe the activities of NHAI official connected
>> with
>> NH-8 ( Delhi-Gurgaon Express Road ). So that truth be upheld.
>>
>> Thanking you,
>>
>> Rejimon C K.
>> President
>> Dwarka Forum(Regd)
>> 453, Plot No. 4
>> Sector 22, Dwarka
>> New Delhi-77
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com>
>> Date: Aug 26, 2009 9:34 AM
>> Subject: Re: COMPLAINT AGAINST NHAI-NH-8 ON DELHI-GURAGAON EXPRESS LINK
>> and
>> demand enquiry
>> To: Kamal Nath <na...@sansad.nic.in>, Pratyunshu Sinha CVC New Delhi <
>> c...@nic.in>
>> Cc: scji...@nhai.org, vkra...@nhai.org, chai...@nhai.org,
>> "SKDash,CVO"
>> <sk....@nic.in>, Kannan Soundara rajan <sounda...@gmail.com>,
>> purshotam behl <jaipu...@yahoo.co.in>
>>
>> Sir, may we know the reason for no answer or action?
>> Now the commutters/users of NH8 on notorious express link from
>> Rajokri/dwarka link put on harassing traffic jam for over 30 mintes,
>> a daily scene.
>>
>> Do you have solution to offer?
>>
>> Rejimon C K
>> 9810315897
>>
>>
>> On 8/19/09, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Sir,
>> >
>> > Please note my earlier communication about the lack of transparency by
>> NHAI
>> > on NH-8 Delhi-Guragaon Express confirm by these Meida reports by Indian
>> > Express.
>> >
>> > The Alleged contracts are hidden, the Project not completed as per
>> Reports
>> > and obtained only partial clerance. A good portion of work is still not
>> > completed however the concessionaries charges toll and that too as per
>> the
>> > investigation by MRTPC the unethical trade practices are followed.
>> > The NAHI staffs responsible are keeping a BLIND EYE. Whay for WHAT ?
>> > This
>> > need to be investigated.
>> > The commuters on this road are put UNDUE HARASSMENT/HARDSHIP. The
>> > Vehicle
>> > moves in less than 25 KM per hour in some stretches. The Services Lanes
>> are
>> > not constructed at many locations to help some petrol pumps and
>> > property
>> > owners along the NH-8.
>> >
>> > Appreciate your good office will order an enquiry and book culprits in
>> > NHAI.
>> >
>> > Thanking you,
>> >
>> > Rejimon C K.
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Aug 19, 2009 12:42 PM
>> > Subject: Re: MOST URGENT: Appeal U/S 19(1) Right to Information Act.
>> > NH-8
>> > (From Gurgaon- Delhi)
>> > To: DWARKA FORUM <DWARKA-R...@googlegroups.com>
>> >
>> >
>> > Highway operator under the scanner
>> > The Delhi-Gurgaon Super Connectivity (DGSC) highway, along with the
>> > NHAI
>> > and
>> > consultancy firm Rites, is being investigated by the Monopolies and
>> > Restrictive Trade Practices Commission for allegedly setting toll
>> > charges
>> > on
>> > wrong projections of vehicle movement and service deficiency.
>> >
>> > As per investigation by the Director General of Investigations and
>> > Registration, the Commission’s probe unit, DGSC (formerly Jaypee DSC
>> > Ventures) has not completed certain basic amenities on the 27.5-km
>> > Delhi-Gurgaon stretch and is still operating on a temporary completion
>> > certificate.
>> >
>> > The DGIR stated in its report: “It is evident the traffic analysis
>> > submitted
>> > by the DGSC to NHAI and Rites was very under-projected and... the toll
>> fees
>> > to be charged in 2020 are being charged now, for each category of
>> > vehicles.”
>> >
>> >
>> > (The DGSC is a special purpose vehicle promoted by DSC Ltd, a joint
>> venture
>> > in which it has over 90 per cent stake. DSC Ltd is responsible for its
>> > operation and maintenance.)
>> >
>> > “The DGSC has adopted a... method that amounts to unfair trade
>> > practice,”
>> > the DGIR said.
>> >
>> > Slamming the NHAI for issuing a toll notification based on
>> under-projected
>> > figures, the report stated: “It is evident that the NHAI has influenced
>> the
>> > notified toll charges (in a manner that resulted) in undue gains to
>> > DGSC
>> at
>> > the cost of the public at large.” The report stated the DGSC’s
>> > estimated
>> > projection was 56,416 vehicles in 2006, 78,711 in 2011, 1,08,224 in
>> > 2016
>> > and
>> > 1,85,258 in 2025. However, after examining documents, it found that
>> around
>> > 1,33,808 vehicles used the toll plaza on the Delhi-Haryana border at
>> Siroli
>> > and 48,693 in Kherki Daula in June this year.
>> >
>> >
>> http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/highway-operator-under-the-scanner/503605/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Lack of smart tags spells extra time, money, say Expressway commuters
>> > *Font Size *
>> > -A<
>> http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/lack-of-smart-tags-spells-extra-time-money-say-expressway-commuters/503601/#
>> >
>> > +A<
>> http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/lack-of-smart-tags-spells-extra-time-money-say-expressway-commuters/503601/#
>> >
>> > Tanushree Roy Chowdhury *Posted: Aug 19, 2009 at 0043 hrs IST*
>> > *Gurgaon* Confusion surrounds the sale of tags for commuters on the
>> > Delhi-Gurgaon Expressway. The commuters, many of whom want to try out
>> > the
>> > tags for the first time, have complained of their non-availability.
>> >
>> > While some said they have been trying without any success to get a tag
>> for
>> > their vehicles for almost three months now, officials at concessionaire
>> DSC
>> > Ltd said some “streamlining” process at the backend could be causing
>> > the
>> > confusion since there are tags available with the firm.
>> >
>> > “There could be regular defaulters who do not recharge their accounts
>> once
>> > they expire. We keep a certain stock that gets replenished every month
>> with
>> > new shipments coming in. It is neither in our economic interest nor is
>> > it
>> > beneficial for public relations to not make tags available for our
>> > customers. We will certainly look into the matter,” a DSC Ltd
>> spokesperson
>> > said.
>> >
>> > “I cross the Delhi-Gurgaon Expressway toll plaza every day to get to my
>> > office in Gurgaon. Despite repeated attempts in person and through the
>> DSC
>> > customer care, I have not been able to get a tag for my car. The
>> > standard
>> > response is that the ‘tags are out of stock and will be available by
>> > the
>> > end
>> > of the month’,” South Delhi resident Sanjay Chakraborty said. “I pay Rs
>> 18
>> > each time I cross the toll plaza and wait for 5 to 7 minutes on an
>> average.
>> > If I had a tag, I would pay only half that amount.”
>> >
>> > Some commuters have alleged that by not providing them with tags DSC
>> > Ltd
>> is
>> > earning higher revenue. “Since it is an NHAI project, the authorities
>> > concerned must step in to ensure the private player does not fleece and
>> > cause hardship to commuters on this account,” Junaid, who works in
>> Gurgaon,
>> > said.
>> >
>> > Others confirmed they had to wait to get their tags. “I was told the
>> > tags
>> > were ‘not available’ and had to wait nearly a month. When I lodged a
>> > complaint with the NHAI and mailed DSC, the tags became available the
>> same
>> > day. I was told they are always available at the IGI toll plaza but
>> people
>> > don’t go there. The DSC’s callous attitude, lack of police presence and
>> > lack
>> > of control by NHAI are responsible for this mess,” Nemesh, a Gurgaon
>> > resident, said.
>> >
>> > While Nemesh was fortunate enough to get a tag, Sukhpreet Singh, who
>> works
>> > in the telecom industry, is still waiting to get his first tag. “I went
>> to
>> > the customer care at the Delhi-Gurgaon toll plaza to get a tag in the
>> last
>> > week of July but the executive there told me new tags were unavailable.
>> > I
>> > checked on August 14 and was told fresh stocks were unlikely till at
>> least
>> > September.”
>> >
>> > Last year, DSC, the developer, had told the Ministry of Road Transport
>> and
>> > Highways that until 70 per cent of commuters switch to tags, proper
>> > functioning of the expressway and reduction in the waiting time could
>> > not
>> > be
>> > expected. Thereafter they had launched a campaign to increase the sale
>> > of
>> > tags by offering discounts soon after the expressway was thrown open.
>> >
>> > *Smart tags*
>> > A Smart Tag is an electronic device the size of a computer mouse that
>> > is
>> > installed on the windscreen, behind the rear view mirror of one’s
>> vehicle.
>> > It is charged with the denomination of one’s choice and has the
>> capability
>> > of interacting with sensors placed at the toll gates. All one has to do
>> is
>> > to slow down to 15 km/h near the toll gates; the sensors at the gate
>> > interact with the Smart Tag and the transaction is recorded, and the
>> > toll
>> > is
>> > deducted. A confirmation beeps inside the car — all of this takes less
>> than
>> > a minute and is the best way of doing away with waiting periods at toll
>> > gates.
>> >
>> > No of vehicles using Expressway daily: 2 lakh vehicles on an average
>> > (on
>> > all
>> > three tolls)
>> >
>> > No of tag users at present: 40 %
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 6/3/09, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Please see a reply received from NHAI following appeal filed u/s 19(1)
>> of
>> >> RTI Act 2005.
>> >>
>> >> Please refer to your reply dated 26/5/2009 DGM-T655.
>> >>
>> >> We regret to note the following:
>> >>
>> >> 1.FAA not granted any hearing for the RTI Applicaiton appeal filed u/s
>> >> 19(1) of RTI Act 2005 dated 11/5/09.
>> >> 2. The reply only refer to 13/6/09 and rest of the email not received
>> by
>> >> NHAI or no notings created ?
>> >> 3. *refer to q No.2. The alleged contract with consortium MUST be
>> >> uploaded
>> >> into website for public domain under statutory disclosure of Section 4
>> of
>> >> RTI Act 2005. As the contract have large implication on public as such
>> >> and
>> >> have all right to know its contents*.
>> >> 4. ref 3 ) As per Master plan the road width of National Highway in
>> Delhi
>> >> as per MPD 2021 is 90 meter. This shows that the MPD 2021 violated?
>> >> 5. ref 4 a b) As per reply and information the original plan had
>> flyover,
>> >> so the change in plan certainly benefitted consortium or not disclosed
>> by
>> >> PIO/FAA. Kindly confirm while signing agreement there was no Flyover
>> >> at
>> >> Kapasehra Junction.
>> >> 6. 7a). The Reply by PIO and FAA is Vouge. The provision is certainly
>> >> there
>> >> on the contract with consortium, if the contract is not executed as
>> >> per
>> >> agreement then who is at default ? Who at NHAI is responsible for non
>> >> implimentation. Is the onus lies withNHAI a govt agency or the private
>> >> consortium ?
>> >> Please note that in case of any accident caused by non scheduled
>> >> vehilces
>> >> such as Two Wheelers on speed highway. The responsibility and
>> >> derlition
>> >> of
>> >> duty will be vested with NHAI/Consortium jointly and severely.
>> >>
>> >> 7. ref 10) As per ref reply the NHAI issued only a PROVISIONAL
>> COMPLETION
>> >> CERTIFICATE ? This also means the NHAI staffs were not involved in PCC
>> >> issue ?
>> >> 8. Ref 11) INFORMATION DENIED. THE REPLY IS VOUGE AND INSTANT APPEAL
>> >> STAND
>> >> AND COMPLAINT WILL BE LODGED WITH CIC U/S 18 AND APPEAL U/S 19 OF RTI
>> >> ACT.
>> >>
>> >> Fact also to be added on ground:
>> >>
>> >> a. The over all quality of Road is VERY SUB Standard with many places
>> >> found
>> >> uneven and jurky road surface on Delhi sides.
>> >> b. The sweeping cleaning, greening and landscaping works not completed
>> >> properly.
>> >> c. The guards/marshal posted at diffent placed have no training nor
>> >> equipped to handle situations of accidents etc..
>> >> d. During the peak hour and NO ENTRY RESTRICTION HOURS Trucks and
>> >> Heavy
>> >> trucks are allowed by Toll Plaza and parked on both sides of NH-8
>> >> Delhi
>> >> portion, clearly violating the Supreme Court Direction and may invite
>> >> Contempt proceedings.
>> >> e. There is clear direction on OVERLOADED Trucks cause heavy
>> >> pollution,
>> >> However govt agencies like NH-8 and its Partners contractors like DSC
>> >> ignorant of these directions.
>> >> f. The File noting dated 2/7/2008.. year passed till date no progress?
>> >> Great work NHAI. Keept it up.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 5/11/09, REJIMON C K <reji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> To:
>> >>> Shri. Subhash Chand Jindal
>> >>>
>> >>> Chief General Manager (Corridor Management) and First Appalet
>> Authority.
>> >>> National Highway Authority
>> >>> G-5/G6 Sector 10,
>> >>> Dwarka, New Delhi-75
>> >>>
>> >>> Phone :-91-011- 25074100 & 25074200 Ext : 1105, Mobile No. 9873002084
>> >>>
>> >>> Email Id :- scji...@nhai.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> cc:
>> >>>
>> >>> Mr. V.K.Rajawat
>> >>>
>> >>> General Manager (Tech) & Public Information Officer.
>> >>>
>> >>> Phone :-91-011- 25074100 & 25074200 Ext : 1101, Mobile No. 9899314750
>> >>>
>> >>> Email Id :- vkra...@nhai.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Sir,
>> >>>
>> >>> Please refer to my RTI Applciation dated 31/3/2009. The reply ref No.
>> >>> NHAI/DGM(T)/NH-8/RTI/2008/621 received only on 8th May 2009. Well
>> beyond
>> >>> stipulated time frame as per RTI Act 2005 and clear violation by PIO.
>> >>> The
>> >>> letter dated 1/5/09 despateched only on 5/5/09 vide ref EP
>> EDB78530060IN
>> >>> from Sansad Marg PO .
>> >>>
>> >>> *Instant appeal filed here *with with following comments and appeal.
>> >>> *A
>> >>> seperate complaint u/s 18 of RTI Act 2005 is being filed with CIC
>> >>> through
>> >>> online for violaiton of provisions of RTI Act 2005 and copy will send
>> to
>> >>> you and PIO in due course.*
>> >>>
>> >>> The Questions, Reply, Comments and appeal as follows:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Please provide the status of email complaints that we have
>> >>> written
>> >>> to your office dated below and their outcome and file notings.
>> >>>
>> >>> *a) *Email [1] dated 3/7/2008 (subject URGENT : NHAI MESS at
>> >>> Mahipalpur flyover),
>> >>>
>> >>> *b) *Email [2]dated 12/12/2007 (Subject: URGENT: NHAI is
>> RESTRICTING
>> >>> entry of Vehicles from Dwarka Link Road ?? (Near Shiv Murthy-Sector
>> >>> 22,
>> >>> Dwarka Road )??)
>> >>>
>> >>> *c) *Email [3] dated 13/6/2008 (Subject NHAI is HARASSING DWARKA
>> >>> Residents: Restricting entry No. 19.),
>> >>>
>> >>> *d) *Email [4] dated 12/2/2009, 16/2/2009, 10/3/2009, (Subject
>> >>> Urgent
>> >>> heavy traffic jam on NH8 near Radisson flyover on gurgaon-delhi
>> stretch)
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Reply:: COMBINED ALL (a-d): The concessionaire is improving geometics
>> of
>> >>> U-Turn for traffic going to gurgaon and like to be complete shortly.
>> >>> However, short term measures to improve traffic flow at radison
>> junction
>> >>> is
>> >>> being looked into. As regard to entry of vehcicles from Dwarka link
>> >>> roadis submit athat the reply was sent through emil to you on
>> >>> 9/7/2008
>> >>> on
>> >>> complaint dated 13/6/2008.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Comments: Appeal: The reply was neither confirm with RTI Act .. Point
>> by
>> >>> point answer not provided. The file notings were not provided.
>> >>>
>> >>> Only answer provided to email dated 13/6/08(Point No c).
>> >>>
>> >>> Appeal to provide point by point reply and file notings
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Have the contract agreement with Jaypee-DSC Ventures Ltd and
>> NHAIis
>> >>> published on the
>> >>> NHAI website? If not under what clause/exception the same is
>> >>> excluded.
>> >>>
>> >>> Reply: Not upload on NHAI .
>> >>>
>> >>> *Appeal: The agreement must have uploaded to website under suo moto
>> >>> declaration of Section 4 of RTI Act 2005. Withholding of the
>> >>> agreement
>> >>> from public domain put serious doubts on the transparency.*
>> >>>
>> >>> Please note the recent Indian express News Line report dated
>> >>> 10/5/2009
>> >>> page on of Delhi New Line.
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Please provide the current width of NH-8 from Rajokri Flyover
>> till
>> >>> Palam Airport Junction. (As we understand as per Master Plan 2021
>> the
>> >>> width
>> >>> should be 90 meter).
>> >>>
>> >>> Reply: ROW in Delhi is 60 Mtr.
>> >>> Comments: This confirms with Master Plan 2021 is not abided while
>> >>> constructing Highway on Delhi side.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Flyover/Under pass/Clover Leaf proposed earlier at Link
>> >>> Roadconnecting Dwarka (Opposite Shiv Murthy)/
>> >>>
>> >>> *a) *Kindly provide under what rules/precedence the flyover/under
>> >>> pass at Link Road Connecting Dwarka abolished?
>> >>>
>> >>> Reply: No such information exist.
>> >>>
>> >>> Comments: On one side PIO state no such information on the other
>> >>> side..
>> >>> ref Point No. ( c) enclosed the letter from AAI on the same FLYOVER.
>> >>>
>> >>> Appeal: The PIO misleads and evade providing complete information.
>> >>>
>> >>> *b) *Please provide the financial benefit for the project on
>> account
>> >>> of non construction of flyover/under pass at the Link Road Junction.
>> >>>
>> >>> Reply: No such information exist.
>> >>>
>> >>> Comments: same as above. The AAI rejection letter confirms the
>> >>> original
>> >>> proposal was there for a flyover. So the amendment to project from
>> >>> original
>> >>> certainly had cost benefit to concessissionairy.
>> >>>
>> >>> Appeal: The PIO misleads and evade providing complete information.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> *c) *Have NHAI received clearance from AAI for construction of
>> >>> clover leaf at NH-8 vide ref No. AAI/20012/1259/06-ARI dated
>> >>> 14/11/2006
>> >>> AAI/20012/1363/06-ARI dated 17/11/2006 and AAI/20012/1421/06-ARI
>> >>> dated
>> >>> 6/12/2006? If so what specific step/action has taken by NHAI under
>> >>> standard procedure.
>> >>>
>> >>> Reply: Copy of letter d 9/9/2004 from AAI attached
>> >>> Comments : No information provided on above question ref letters of
>> >>> AAI
>> >>> dated in 2006.
>> >>> *Appeal: the information is not provide what Specific step under
>> >>> standard
>> >>> procedure taken by NHAI on above ref 2006 letters of AAI.*
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Please provide under what specific provision prohibited the
>> >>> NHAI
>> >>> to
>> >>> display the helpline and grievance contact on NH-8 stretch of
>> >>> Delhi .
>> >>>
>> >>> NO REPLY PROVIDED.
>> >>>
>> >>> Appeal to provide point by point reply
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Please provide the status on uncompleted items as per contract
>> >>> with
>> >>> Jaypee-DSC for NH-8 Express Road ( Delhi stretch).
>> >>>
>> >>> NO REPLY PROVIDED.
>> >>>
>> >>> Appeal to provide point by point reply
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Please provide under what provision the two wheelers and three
>> >>> wheelers are allowed by NHAI on the NH-8 speed corridor.
>> >>>
>> >>> *a) *If any untoward accidents on account of banned vehicles
>> >>> cause,
>> >>> please provide the name of the officials to be named in the
>> >>> complaint/case
>> >>> as respondent.
>> >>>
>> >>> NO REPLY PROVIDED.
>> >>>
>> >>> Appeal to provide point by point reply
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Please provide the complete name of the official responsible
>> >>> for
>> >>> ensuring the smooth flow of traffic on NH-8 and Services roads of
>> >>> Delhi
>> >>> stretch( ie. Mahipalpur area).
>> >>>
>> >>> NO REPLY PROVIDED.
>> >>>
>> >>> Appeal to provide point by point reply
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Please provide the name of the official responsible for
>> >>> ensuring
>> >>> the quality of maintenance of NH-8 under Jaypee-DSC contract for
>> >>> Delhi
>> >>> stretch.
>> >>>
>> >>> NO REPLY PROVIDED.
>> >>>
>> >>> Appeal to provide point by point reply
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Pleaser provide the name of the officials involved in giving
>> final
>> >>> clearance to NH-8 Express Link (COD)before handing over to Jaypee
>> DSC
>> >>> for
>> >>> operation and public.
>> >>>
>> >>> NO REPLY PROVIDED.
>> >>>
>> >>> Appeal to provide point by point reply
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Have the NHAI penalised the Jaypee-DSC for the delay in
>> completing
>> >>> the project ? If not under what exception of the contract
>> clause/rule
>> >>> exempted for penal action?
>> >>>
>> >>> NO REPLY PROVIDED.
>> >>>
>> >>> Appeal to provide point by point reply
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> *P R A Y E R*
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> In view of the above the following is humbly prayed:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> (i) Direction may kindly be issued to the Respondent
>> >>> to
>> >>> provide the correct, sufficient and clear information as sought for.
>> >>> Direction may kindly be issue to PIO to provide * Para ** wise(point by
>> >>> point)* reply and all relevant information be uploaded to department
>> >>> website for public at large and set example in transparency.
>> >>>
>> >>> (ii) Suitable and STRICT action under Section 20 may please be
>> >>> initiated against the Respondents(PIO’s) for acting against the
>> >>> statutory
>> >>> provisions of Right to Information Act, 2005.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> (ii) Suitable and STRICT appropriate disciplinary action may
>> >>> please
>> >>> be
>> >>> initiated against the Respondents(PIO’s) for acting against the
>> >>> statutory
>> >>> provisions of Right to Information Act, 2005.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> (iii) Any other or further relief which this Hon'ble
>> Authority
>> >>> may deem fit in the interest of the justice under Right to
>> >>> Information
>> >>> Act,
>> >>> 2005.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Rejimon C K
>> >>>
>> >>> Appellant
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:57 PM, REJIMON C K
>> >>> <reji...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *Application Under Right to Information Act 2005*
>> >>>>
>> >>>> * *
>> >>>>
>> >>>> *Rejimon C. K. *
>> >>>> President
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Dwarka Forum(Regd)
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 453 Nav Sansad Vihar,
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Plot 4, Sector 22,
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Dwarka,
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> New Delhi 110075
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 31 March 2009
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Regd AD
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> To:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Central Public Information Officer
>> >>>>
>> >>>> GM-Admin
>> >>>>
>> >>>> National Highway Authority
>> >>>>
>> >>>> G-5-6, Sector 10
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Dwarka, New Delhi-75.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> vksh...@nhai.org
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Dear Sir,
--
REJIMON C K.
Each year 50million trees and 75 billion water is used to create 7 million tonnes of mail, over 40% of which is thrown away unopened. source : National Geographic so the next time you receive paper, think again before you print. choose to receive emails instead .
--
REJIMON C K.
Each year 50million trees and 75 billion water is used to create 7 million tonnes of mail, over 40% of which is thrown away unopened. source : National Geographic so the next time you receive paper, think again before you print. choose to receive emails instead .
--
REJIMON C K.
Each year 50million trees and 75 billion water is used to create 7 million tonnes of mail, over 40% of which is thrown away unopened. source : National Geographic so the next time you receive paper, think again before you print. choose to receive emails instead .
--
REJIMON C K.
Each year 50million trees and 75 billion water is used to create 7 million tonnes of mail, over 40% of which is thrown away unopened. source : National Geographic so the next time you receive paper, think again before you print. choose to receive emails instead .
--