Message from discussion
That age-old FCP gamma issue again
Received: by 10.141.2.18 with SMTP id e18mr89685rvi.28.1245821787619;
Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <randy.qui...@gmail.com>
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.172])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 25si74207pxi.9.2009.06.23.22.36.26;
Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of randy.qui...@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.172 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.200.172;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of randy.qui...@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.172 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=randy.qui...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so178646wfa.13
for <DV-L@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject
:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=mdc81sJ5p9duHkHFdSPiftZ9K9C5Rtr9oILRrpoYUis=;
b=tikfrtgJd+Pln/qJp3588Za66y9/6CYPwAOu+x2tX6fXCznzAVLXgvTMRPiw3TkZrx
7y9wgYDkE0GjYYtYIXyC16XwAutNWKM/ONAYBgpcGwu21YZJzjloJWgUYwfU0F2vnd1D
Og22s+Gnxtk81wfPW8QcHWfYWEpzRBe5f7aS4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
b=ub3JkKDRtEQI3jTaplU9QauNzQ0V5GTQuUljAHOF23MfVuF864+YaQ25TXUFg2ai9Q
w9Enf1J8XFXhlzarQvRwREwQXneRbbmw6Rzkf4U//LqfRYwitLDbgekHfrrz9ddOYIqI
O2CvDoyzbFeeyKCBDwlwvSI7iKf6BmbmySyt4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.204.18 with SMTP id b18mr316441wfg.143.1245821786345; Tue,
23 Jun 2009 22:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:36:26 +0800
Message-ID: <6d98b1320906232236g6be0414axb6852c67297ae51@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: That age-old FCP gamma issue again
From: Randy Quimpo <randy.qui...@gmail.com>
To: DV-L@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
A client informed me that she prefered that I use FLAT backgrounds for
their videos, because the gradients wash out upon projection.
I realize now that maybe this is that age-old gamma issue again. I am
editing on FCP, and outputing a WMV file (made via Flip4Mac) for
preview purposes, then I submit a DVD which I presume is also used for
projection.
She told me that an earlier work I did was almost entirely unviewable
because it was all washed out.
I reviewed the graphic and made the backgrounds darker, so the text
stands out better. But I realize that if the gamma settings dont
match, then this might be the reason why the gradients get lost in the
projection. What do you guys think?
|
