Citigroup - Flash: India Banks - CRR Returns - Some Concessions, Not Structural
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Sunil
unread,
Feb 26, 2007, 12:51:32 PM2/26/07
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to dps...@googlegroups.com
Summary
Banks get a little gain in FY07, and going forward — The RBI made
a few changes to the returns it offers to banks on their CRR balances.
This should add about 5bp in margins for FY07 (back-ended in 4Q07),
and about 3bp going forward, across the sector. Supports
profitability, to a limited extent.
But, CRR remains a fundamental drain on bank profitability —
Raised returns do not materially change the drain that is the CRR. We
estimate an opportunity cost, and effective loss, of 55-60bp of margin
for banks. This is estimated at current market rates, and the
increased returns only provide an offset of about 3bp.
Two changes - retrospective and prospective — RBI had announced 0%
returns on CRR in June 06. Since the notification has only been
effected in January 07, RBI is a) Compensating banks over the June –
Feb 07 period, at a higher rate (350-200bp) level; b) Raising returns
from 0% to 1%, prospectively. The effective yield for banks is
substantially lower – they do not get any returns on the first 3% of
CRR, and so effective returns are only 0.5% on 6% CRR assets.
The concession – Likely driven by rising P&L impact of CRR —
We would believe RBI has made a slight concession to its June 06
change as the financial impact of the CRR has increased since June 06
as a) CRR itself has been raised to 6% from 5% since; and b) the cost
of funding the CRR has risen by 150-200bp since. This is only a mild
concession, but potentially reflects some cognizance of onerous
regulatory requirements on the banking system.
Positive, but only a mild one — This does come as a slight
positive for banks – private and Government, against a slew of more
onerous regulatory developments in the recent past. However, not
structural or meaningfully
directional.