ADFS and OAuth 2.0

969 views
Skip to first unread message

sferrise

unread,
May 4, 2012, 12:24:15 PM5/4/12
to DotNetOpenAuth
Hello,

I was wondering if anyone had done work to use ADFS as the identity
provider and use DotNetOpenAuth to manage the authorization.

The documentation seems to be in flux, so if there are any samples or
articles someone can point me to, that would be most helpful.

Thanks,

Sam

Andrew Arnott

unread,
May 4, 2012, 3:01:26 PM5/4/12
to dotnet...@googlegroups.com
I have done it.  Since authorization and authentication is orthogonal, it's actually as straightforward as the two pieces separately.  Just build a DNOA authorization server, which uses ADFS for user authentication.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DotNetOpenAuth" group.
To post to this group, send email to dotnet...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to dotnetopenid...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/dotnetopenid?hl=en.



--
--
Andrew Arnott
"I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre

sferrise

unread,
May 4, 2012, 3:59:32 PM5/4/12
to DotNetOpenAuth
If I look at the OAuthAuthorizationServer sample, this follows that
model, except instead of using an OpenId provider WIF is used?

The key for me is to use active federation with ADFS due to some other
constraints which I think is where I am getting tripped up.

On May 4, 2:01 pm, Andrew Arnott <andrewarn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have done it.  Since authorization and authentication is orthogonal, it's
> actually as straightforward as the two pieces separately.  Just build a
> DNOA authorization server, which uses ADFS for user authentication.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Friday, May 4, 2012, sferrise wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> > I was wondering if anyone had done work to use ADFS as the identity
> > provider and use DotNetOpenAuth to manage the authorization.
>
> > The documentation seems to be in flux, so if there are any samples or
> > articles someone can point me to, that would be most helpful.
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > Sam
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "DotNetOpenAuth" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to dotnet...@googlegroups.com<javascript:;>
> > .
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > dotnetopenid...@googlegroups.com <javascript:;>.

Andrew Arnott

unread,
May 4, 2012, 4:02:56 PM5/4/12
to dotnet...@googlegroups.com
Yes, that sounds about right.

--
Andrew Arnott
"I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre


To post to this group, send email to dotnet...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to dotnetopenid...@googlegroups.com.

sferrise

unread,
May 4, 2012, 4:05:45 PM5/4/12
to DotNetOpenAuth
Thanks - I'll give that a shot; appreciate the response.

Sam

Jorge Silva

unread,
May 5, 2012, 10:06:21 AM5/5/12
to dotnet...@googlegroups.com
Hey,

Out of curiosity, why dont you just use WIF + ADFS 2?

I used ADFS 2(proxy + full featured behind the firewall) and implemented a WIF website with passive auth and actas for WCF services.


What does DNOA brings to the table so its more viable than what i said?


Thanks,
Jorge
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages