Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
DotNetOpenAuth
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
ADFS and OAuth 2.0
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   6 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
sferrise  
View profile  
 More options May 4 2012, 12:24 pm
From: sferrise <s.ferr...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 09:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, May 4 2012 12:24 pm
Subject: ADFS and OAuth 2.0
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Hello,

I was wondering if anyone had done work to use ADFS as the identity
provider and use DotNetOpenAuth to manage the authorization.

The documentation seems to be in flux, so if there are any samples or
articles someone can point me to, that would be most helpful.

Thanks,

Sam


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Andrew Arnott  
View profile  
 More options May 4 2012, 3:01 pm
From: Andrew Arnott <andrewarn...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 12:01:26 -0700
Local: Fri, May 4 2012 3:01 pm
Subject: Re: [dotnetopenauth] ADFS and OAuth 2.0
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

I have done it.  Since authorization and authentication is orthogonal, it's
actually as straightforward as the two pieces separately.  Just build a
DNOA authorization server, which uses ADFS for user authentication.

--
--
Andrew Arnott
"I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death
your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
sferrise  
View profile  
 More options May 4 2012, 3:59 pm
From: sferrise <s.ferr...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 12:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, May 4 2012 3:59 pm
Subject: Re: ADFS and OAuth 2.0
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
If I look at the OAuthAuthorizationServer sample, this follows that
model, except instead of using an OpenId provider WIF is used?

The key for me is to use active federation with ADFS due to some other
constraints which I think is where I am getting tripped up.

On May 4, 2:01 pm, Andrew Arnott <andrewarn...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Andrew Arnott  
View profile  
 More options May 4 2012, 4:02 pm
From: Andrew Arnott <andrewarn...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 13:02:56 -0700
Local: Fri, May 4 2012 4:02 pm
Subject: Re: [dotnetopenauth] Re: ADFS and OAuth 2.0
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Yes, that sounds about right.
--
Andrew Arnott
"I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death
your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
sferrise  
View profile  
 More options May 4 2012, 4:05 pm
From: sferrise <s.ferr...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 13:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, May 4 2012 4:05 pm
Subject: Re: ADFS and OAuth 2.0
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Thanks - I'll give that a shot; appreciate the response.

Sam

On May 4, 3:02 pm, Andrew Arnott <andrewarn...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jorge Silva  
View profile  
 More options May 5 2012, 10:06 am
From: Jorge Silva <jorgesilvap...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 15:06:21 +0100
Local: Sat, May 5 2012 10:06 am
Subject: Re: [dotnetopenauth] Re: ADFS and OAuth 2.0
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Hey,

Out of curiosity, why dont you just use WIF + ADFS 2?

I used ADFS 2(proxy + full featured behind the firewall) and implemented a
WIF website with passive auth and actas for WCF services.

What does DNOA brings to the table so its more viable than what i said?

Thanks,
Jorge


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google