The harassment didn't start by itself, so someone must have. been there at
the outset to give it a firm push and set the "animals" after me.. It looks
as if I was set up in June 1990, and. the timing indicates someone from
university. was responsible.
>One thing which has been missing from this discussion is this. simple
>prognosis: that maybe. he is right and that, despite his admitted
>mental condition,. there really is a campaign against him organised by
>now-influential. ex-students of his university.
In. May or June 1990, Alan Freeman on Radio 1 read out a letter from someone
who had known. me for a few years, who wrote of the one who "wore out his
welcome with random precision" (from. the Pink Floyd song). Freeman went on
to say to the writer "that's a hell of a letter you wrote. there". The
indication is strongly that people I. had parted from soon before nursed a
grudge. against me and were trying to cause trouble for me.
The suggestion is that. Freeman might have shown the letter to other people,
and things could have snowballed from there. Right from. the start the real
source (security services presumed) didn't announce. themselves as the
origin, but let the "talkers", the radio DJs, believe that they. were the
originators. Think about it; if you announce, "we're. MI5 and we have a
campaign against this bloke" then people might not go along. with it; but if
you say, "everyone else is getting at this bloke because. he 'deserves' it"
then. people will join in with fewer qualms.
>Why would "they" wish. to assassinate your character?
It's the classic case of. hitting a cripple to prove you're stronger. Why
would. the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and more
than six years of manpower. to try to kill a British citizen? Because they
are motivated by people who knew me at university and. feel personal
animosity; because they knew me to be emotionally weak, and it is in. the
nature of bullies to prey on those known to be. weak; and because they can
rely on the complicity of the establishment,. which the security services
manipulate and derive funding from. This is. England's biggest humiliation
today, and the British security services are intent on. preventing their
humiliation becoming reality by continuing their. campaign of attempted
murder to suppress the truth from becoming. public.
1518
"Now one week," (which is the seventieth, which remains), "shall confirm the
covenant with many, and in the midst of the week," (that is to say, the last
three and a half years), "he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to
cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate,
even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the
desolate."
Daniel 11. "The angel said to Daniel: There shall stand up yet," (after
Cyrus, under whom this still is), "three kings in Persia," (Cambyses,
Smerdis, Darius); and the fourth who shall then come," (Xerxes) "shall be
far richer than they all, and far stronger, and shall stir up all his people
against the Greeks.
"But a mighty king shall stand up," (Alexander), "that shall rule with great
dominion, and do according to his will. And when he shall stand up, his
kingdom shall be broken, and shall be divided in four parts toward the four
winds of heaven," (as he had said above, 7:6; 8:8), "but not his posterity;
and his successors shall not equal his power, for his kingdom shall be
plucked up, even for others besides these," (his four chief successors).
"And the king of the south," (Ptolemy, son of Lagos, Egypt), "shall be
strong; but one of his princes shall be strong above him, and his dominion
shall be a great dominion," (Seleucus, King of Syria. Appian says that he
was the most powerful of Alexander's successors).
"And in the end of years they shall join themselves together, and the king's
daughter of the south," (Berenice, daughter of Ptolemy Philadelphus, son of
the other