Message from discussion
Status of bug #11580 ?
Received: by 10.204.145.140 with SMTP id d12mr304650bkv.6.1352280394615;
Wed, 07 Nov 2012 01:26:34 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: django-users@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.147.197 with SMTP id m5ls1565565bkv.0.gmail; Wed, 07 Nov
2012 01:25:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.205.123.145 with SMTP id gk17mr303212bkc.2.1352280348821;
Wed, 07 Nov 2012 01:25:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.205.123.145 with SMTP id gk17mr303211bkc.2.1352280348801;
Wed, 07 Nov 2012 01:25:48 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <tomas.ehrl...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t1si2126164bkt.1.2012.11.07.01.25.48
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Wed, 07 Nov 2012 01:25:48 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of tomas.ehrl...@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.53;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of tomas.ehrl...@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=tomas.ehrl...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-bk0-f53.google.com with SMTP id jg15so606747bkc.12
for <django-users@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 01:25:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization
:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=ZPG10Ks1BGrty9nxMIkFVpcX/bTuZGnS1FvTavC08pk=;
b=zVgZMyx6TO6jtSPcJBdUUMFoYDHQQCDzvtKyYcRruBIa7KISyvenezg5QaPPAR1vAa
2vv2UJPXEWF6jNtJchJ0zGPcTMWxN1KJbsZ7puXPXS5coWOupIukjrgzj5qBfvSPwef6
SV5kFl0mTFCHEzFlSQ1JFlV/yN4Rb396YE2ChCIqbDAx+NHRyHNYi98UpFZEUUmjI0at
LvHxohhiRIE1uvfceoLw1c03kAYtanP5O7UR+k11nvY3klAmo3gDFaP9wMyBb9VUZzQa
3JEJScnG8Fjq3BmH/96RPhy5nO1q/rEKUTsqtYszdr4F8kgmZucRkbnD84ORMTL89w8v
ZsYg==
Received: by 10.204.7.213 with SMTP id e21mr907228bke.32.1352280348618;
Wed, 07 Nov 2012 01:25:48 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <tomas.ehrl...@gmail.com>
Received: from bodhi.bodhi (asus.czechglobe.cz. [147.231.201.160])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s20sm13790556bkw.15.2012.11.07.01.25.47
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Wed, 07 Nov 2012 01:25:47 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 10:24:22 +0100
From: Tomas Ehrlich <tomas.ehrl...@gmail.com>
To: django-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Status of bug #11580 ?
Message-ID: <20121107102422.47cdf...@bodhi.bodhi>
In-Reply-To: <CAAGvU1bnLU7xMyTXua8bAuyiMMk3Ur-fz36B8BqT8JXc8OG...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAGvU1a7ML_RxiSHw-gB4_KCUmprhhRbgLNBPR3HW_CqMJT...@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAGvU1bgEsC5nTtU7U37epKigbRy_6v-YF2JGJZmVhCkS5T...@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJxq848azQ6+V65cr5R688ZpPr-V+VDs5dKYdmBUW2w1WiO...@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAGvU1bnLU7xMyTXua8bAuyiMMk3Ur-fz36B8BqT8JXc8OG...@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: E-bros.org
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Micha=C5=82,
actually, you *do have* such a privilege. Simply clone development
version of django, fix the file with bug, test it, and post patch to
ticket you've mentioned.
If you include test which check, that your patch really fix the bug,
core developers will pull in into repository soon.
It's really that easy and for you it would be dead easy, since you
already know the solution.
Take a look at
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/internals/contributing/
Cheers,
Tom
Dne Wed, 7 Nov 2012 09:13:33 +0000
Micha=C5=82 Nowotka <mmm...@gmail.com> napsal(a):
> OK, so first of all I'm new to both lists. I already asked some questions
> here and usually I get email with my question 5 minutes after post (I mean
> my original question not the answer). I was waiting long and I though my
> question didn't pass moderation so maybe it would be better to ask it on
> probably less strict django-users group. So my apologies for my impatienc=
e.
>=20
> Now about the bug itself. Although there is not any patch attached to th=
is
> bug report you can find it in the text. The filed_cast_sql function shou=
ld
> be changed from:
>=20
> def field_cast_sql(self, db_type):
> if db_type and db_type.endswith('LOB'):
> return "DBMS_LOB.SUBSTR(%s)"
> else:
> return "%s"
>=20
> to:
>=20
> def field_cast_sql(self, db_type):
> return "%s"
>=20
> or even completely removed. Since this is trivial it's only a matter of
> including this small change in core. I don't have such privileges that's
> why I'm asking you to do it.
>=20
> Kind regards,
> Michal Nowotka
>=20
S pozdravem
Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 Ehrlich
Email: tomas.ehrl...@gmail.com
Tel: +420 608 219 889
Jabber: elv...@jabber.cz
"P=C5=AFjdu kamkoliv, pokud je to kup=C5=99edu." - J. London