Received: by 10.224.223.84 with SMTP id ij20mr7344525qab.5.1349443519965;
        Fri, 05 Oct 2012 06:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: django-users@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.224.203.197 with SMTP id fj5ls5821843qab.7.gmail; Fri, 05 Oct
 2012 06:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.220.12 with SMTP id hw12mr7355733qab.8.1349443491695;
        Fri, 05 Oct 2012 06:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.220.12 with SMTP id hw12mr7355732qab.8.1349443491682;
        Fri, 05 Oct 2012 06:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <amirouche.boube...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qc0-f174.google.com (mail-qc0-f174.google.com [209.85.216.174])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ek33si2100175qcb.0.2012.10.05.06.24.51
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 05 Oct 2012 06:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of amirouche.boube...@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.174;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of amirouche.boube...@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.174 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=amirouche.boube...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-qc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id d3so1131959qch.33
        for <django-users@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 06:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=+jugBinAKVvqXu+B/Kjmzn05p7tNryNEnEAtRV0JG2M=;
        b=byzImvsKv3ljhbVbgM7VDtoJP2BWqfxuAIlU5u+IiIcBPcrqfWsLegSCHvweOWmRBO
         8K6b/bD4yn17iN8jS9NwbHXKd1GfIKod5BgtGfT7+BMUEVA66e6ls9X+Oay96N9YMREU
         ietz/RmPyk37OLES19DRGvgSeGuM/qXa7E3gbrrKcpcoZ4Ij4tpS5bs302rNtYtMhkqP
         QCFJ75MydF6n2Wwblscbsv/72XTNbIg6CK+YXwpsgztn61dLfPGNsp+3lwE3FvTZw5Wy
         C4UrVAbCelGNtxD7F5JYr/fZwSVuYNVM+bnYrPIHRGj3Gfq8vW9TdIaM2XETYO+3sitr
         4OcA==
Received: by 10.49.129.201 with SMTP id ny9mr24911644qeb.37.1349443491570;
 Fri, 05 Oct 2012 06:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.108.9 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 06:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5590df4f-3250-425f-8fa9-2e845657ab06@googlegroups.com>
References: <6497228d-4622-48a6-be68-5f7baa57cd72@googlegroups.com>
 <0c6fb456-4939-454e-b201-ddcbb6a5b787@googlegroups.com> <5590df4f-3250-425f-8fa9-2e845657ab06@googlegroups.com>
From: Amirouche Boubekki <amirouche.boube...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 15:24:31 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL7_Mo_gkCG+X6bFtApPv28H0zj4eKbQZPfOE=5R3BqAWos...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Django performance vs others
To: django-users@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b678824f5a2aa04cb4fcba1

--047d7b678824f5a2aa04cb4fcba1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

>
> I have had no idea until recently that django template are sooo slow...
> other engines do the same... but spent less time. What the cool feature
> prevent it for rendering it faster?


The template parsing I guess, but I'm not sure.

--047d7b678824f5a2aa04cb4fcba1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margi=
n:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I have had no ide=
a until recently that django template are sooo slow... other engines do the=
 same... but spent less time. What the cool feature prevent it for renderin=
g it faster?</blockquote>

<br><div>The template parsing I guess, but I&#39;m not sure.<br></div></div=
>

--047d7b678824f5a2aa04cb4fcba1--