Re: Is there any small and easy website example available for Django?

119 views
Skip to first unread message

Jon Crowell

unread,
Oct 9, 2012, 9:25:33 AM10/9/12
to django...@googlegroups.com
I have just installed Pinry, which is a nice small django project. It
isn't static, though. But it is small enough and simple enough that
you can easily look through the source code and understand what is
going on. I think it is well-suited to learning Django.

You can find Pinry here:

http://overshard.github.com/pinry/
https://github.com/overshard/pinry

Installing on a Mac or Linux machine is straightforward. (If you run
into trouble with JPEG image support, you can check out my blog post
at: http://joncrowell.org/2012/10/installing-pillow-1-7-7-and-solving-the-jpeg-support-not-available-and-_imaging-c-module-error-in-python-pil-errors-all-for-pinry/)

Jon


On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Sarbjit singh <sarbj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am very new to Django and I just finished first seven chapters from
> Djangobook.com. I am wondering how can we implement a small static content
> website using Django. I mean website should have Home Page and few other
> pages along with some menu options. I searched a lot on google for example
> of this small website, but was not successful. I could only found examples
> for implementing Wiki, Blog but i am new to Django, so i am looking for an
> easy example.
>
> Can anyone please point me to the link for such example?
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Django users" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-users/-/z8aE98t9ZTUJ.
> To post to this group, send email to django...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> django-users...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.

lacry...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 9, 2012, 9:28:12 AM10/9/12
to django...@googlegroups.com

First of all, djangobook.com is outdated, and not recommended, at least last time i checked it.

Secondly, for what seems to be your need, i'd recommend django-cms or some other cms application for django since without some kind of cms app, building a static content site would rapidly become, imo, very repetitive and highly hardcoded

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Sarbjit singh
Enviados: 09/10/2012 02:46:26
Asunto: Is there any small and easy website example available for Django?

Jon Crowell

unread,
Oct 9, 2012, 9:49:42 AM10/9/12
to django...@googlegroups.com
I am also using djangobook.com. If it is outdated and not
recommended, then what resource should we use instead? Also, I find it
fairly relevant and easy to follow, so I'm curious what specific
objections there are to it. Incidentally, I'm using the version on
github that is being updated:
https://github.com/jacobian/djangobook.com

Jon

Stephen Anto

unread,
Oct 9, 2012, 9:54:02 AM10/9/12
to django...@googlegroups.com
hi,

www.f2finterview.com has been fully developed by Django.
--
Thanks & Regards
Stephen S



Blog:      blog.f2finterview.com

Joel Goldstick

unread,
Oct 9, 2012, 2:55:36 PM10/9/12
to django...@googlegroups.com
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Stephen Anto <charvi...@gmail.com> wrote:
hi,

www.f2finterview.com has been fully developed by Django.


On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Jon Crowell <imper...@joncrowell.org> wrote:
I am also using djangobook.com.  If it is outdated and not
recommended, then what resource should we use instead? Also, I find it
fairly relevant and easy to follow, so I'm curious what specific
objections there are to it. Incidentally, I'm using the version on
github that is being updated:
https://github.com/jacobian/djangobook.com

Jon


On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:28 AM, lacry...@gmail.com
<lacry...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> First of all, djangobook.com is outdated, and not recommended, at least last time i checked it.
>
I think the django book  is not advised by many because it covers version1.0.  Django is at 1.4 now.  In the mean time, static files are treated differently (static (js, css, images) and media  (user uploaded files) are split).  In 1.4 the structure of a project was changed (adding a new top level directory).   Also generic view functions are deprecated in favor of generic class views.    

So, if you are using 1.4 and following along with the book there will be disconnects.  However, I find I keep going back to the book to understand this or that aspect of how django works.  Its well written.  Just find newer articles on the web, and refer to djangodocs latest documentation as your bible for how things work now.
--
Joel Goldstick

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages