You cannot post messages because only members can post, and you are not currently a member.
Description:
Discussion group for Django developers. This group is used for discussion of developing Django itself, not user questions; Please use django-users for issues regarding using the framework, questions for the Django user community outreach, etc.
|
|
|
selecting app for syncdb
|
| |
Hello, Is the any particular reason why syncdb doesn't have argument with list of applications to be synced?
|
|
|
Predicate as suggested new feature to extend url resolver process
|
| |
I just did a pull request resulting of my last Django sprints for
adding a new feature in Django.
[link]
The idea is being able to have more control on the url resolving
process.
I have no merit behind the idea of predicate. Predicate is one of my
favorite feature in Pyramid/Pylons to allow more complex and flexible... more »
|
|
|
Passing parameters to raw()
|
| |
Hello,
the docs say:
"""
Passing parameters into raw()
If you need to perform parameterized queries, you can use the params
argument to raw():
...
params is a list of parameters. You’ll use %s placeholders in the
query string (regardless of your database engine); they’ll be replaced... more »
|
|
|
Handling tests in django-localflavor-*
|
| |
Hi :-)
I'm currently looking through the test-integration of the localflavor
packages and due to the structure used here it looks like (as Erik found
out before me) it kind of lends itself to something like nose as testrunner.
For this we both integrated test_settings module into the respective... more »
|
|
|
I'm interested in maintaining localflavor-at
|
| |
Hi :-)
If nobody else volunteers, I'd like to help by maintaining the
localflavor-at package.
First working order should be to get it it somehow onto PyPI (depending
on the outcome of Jannis' proposal).
Username on IRC and Github: zerok
Best wishes,
Horst
|
|
|
Combine localflavor apps again
|
| |
Hi all,
I'd like propose to combine all the django-localflavor-* packages - that were moved out of contrib a while ago - into a new "django-localflavor" package. None of the current maintainers would lose the commit bit. I'm ready to do the heavy lifting for that.
Ever since the localflavor apps were removed from contrib I've seen many stale ones, lingering on Github, only collecting issues and pull requests, without much guidance. We have been missing maintainers since the removal from contrib, even if some of the core developers helped out every once in a while. Recently we added a few more maintainers for each of those packages since they asked for it, which is great. But frankly I think that's not enough. Up until now only 7 of the 44 localflavor on github.com/django have been re-released on PyPI as separate packages. In other words, we have a success rate of handing over the maintainership of ~15%. I think that's because there is a lot of maintenance friction for each package.... more »
|
|
|
I am interested in maintaining django-localflavor-us
|
| |
The django-localflavor-us package currently lacks a responsive
maintainer. I would like to fix this problem by helping to maintain
this project.
My primary goals:
* Make the tests easier to run
* Merge good pull requests
* Add instructions for contributing (namely how to run the tests)
* Ensure the project stays up-to-date on PyPI... more »
|
|
|
Proposal: Support for HTTP PATCH method
|
| |
There is a RFC describing HTTP method named PATCH:
[link]
Quoting that RFC:
“ The difference between the PUT and PATCH requests is reflected in the
way the server processes the enclosed entity to modify the resource
identified by the Request-URI. In a PUT request, the enclosed entity... more »
|
|
|
