Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion Django 1.0 features -- the definitive list
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Max Battcher  
View profile
 More options Nov 30 2007, 2:27 am
From: "Max Battcher" <m...@worldmaker.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 02:27:34 -0500
Local: Fri, Nov 30 2007 2:27 am
Subject: Re: Django 1.0 features -- the definitive list
On Nov 30, 2007 2:18 AM, jj <jjmor...@gmail.com> wrote:

> move 0.96 to 1.0 status. This might sound somewhat artificial, but
> would clearly indicate that 0.96 is a version one can already trust.
> Isn't the Web site already advocating 0.96 that way?

That might be a good idea...  backport any remaining useful fixes to
0.96, maybe go ahead and do the newforms -> forms rename, and not much
more really needs to be done and call that 1.0 and everything else
becomes 2.0...

On the other hand I also see the humor in skipping directly from 0.96 to 2.0.

The way changes steadily get pushed to Trunk I'm wondering if Django
might not be better off using Ubuntu-style date-based versions,
anyway.  (ie, the current Ubuntu release was official in October 2007
and thus is version 7.10)   I think it would be even funnier to skip
from 0.96 to 8.01... and then follow that up with new versions each
quarter, if not each month...

--
--Max Battcher--
http://www.worldmaker.net/


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google