The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <jacob.kaplanm...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:03:38 -0500
Local: Mon, Mar 26 2007 11:03 am
Subject: Re: Support for a binary storage field?
On 3/26/07, Simon G. <d...@simon.net.nz> wrote:
> So - if we do want a BinaryField we could use #2417 and make it +1 on having a BinaryField. I'd actually like to see BinaryField be > suitable for larger binary stores (e.g. the VARBINARY used for MySQL > has a max length of 255 bytes - perfect for the small bin. chunks > wanted in #2417, but not for larger data), and then hook it up to > Image/FileFields for #652. > An alternate solution is to check in #2417 for small binary chunks, the "larger" binary field, and have a SmallBinaryField alongside for databases with those types. -1 on allowing File/ImageField to be stored in the database. That's Jacob You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||