viral load: a test based on false assumptions?

8 views
Skip to first unread message

Jeswin

unread,
Feb 11, 2012, 6:38:45 PM2/11/12
to diy...@googlegroups.com
I'm looking over the method of viral load to quantify virus particles
in the body [1]. Most of the methods are based on PCR technology. I
have also came across some information saying viral load test based on
PCR have a weak foundation [2], [3]. Those against viral load say that
the test is non-specific, measures inactive viral particles (not sure
what this is), and some other stuff.

Anyone with a better grasp of this topic care to enlighten me on this?
I also realize that website with titles like "virus myth" may not be
very trustworthy but I would like to know if their assumptions are
wrong.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viral_load
[2] http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/chjtests5.htm
[3] http://www.aliveandwell.org/html/viral_load_tcell/viral_load.html

Pat

unread,
Feb 12, 2012, 7:34:13 AM2/12/12
to DIYbio
What virus are you trying to work with?

Real-Time PCR will allow you to quantify the amount of DNA present in
a same.

Old School Methods
Plaque Assay
Endpoint dilution
Hemagglutination

Phil

unread,
Feb 12, 2012, 3:33:31 PM2/12/12
to DIYbio
On Feb 12, 7:34 am, Pat <ele...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What virus are you trying to work with?
>
> Real-Time PCR will allow you to quantify the amount of DNA present in
> a sample.

Real-time PCR will allow you to quantify the relative amounts of DNA
in two samples. "Absolute" quantification just means you already knew
the quantity in one of the samples.

Jeswin

unread,
Feb 12, 2012, 5:18:15 PM2/12/12
to diy...@googlegroups.com
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Pat <ele...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What virus are you trying to work with?
>
I'm just doing some research into clinical tests used with viruses.

I came across the PCR method, branched DNA method, and Nucleic Acid
Based Sequence Amplification.

Rick Byers

unread,
Feb 18, 2012, 10:45:58 PM2/18/12
to diy...@googlegroups.com

I'm not an expert, but I've been reading a lot of papers on viral diagnostics lately.  It seems pretty clear to me that qPCR is a great tool (probably the best overall) for sensitive and precise quantitative measurement of viral load.  A virology professor I spoke to a couple days ago confirmed this.  There are a ton of papers, but here's one open access one in particular that may help: http://jcm.asm.org/content/43/5/2356.full.

Rick

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages