Also, after an overnight culture, the bacteria will usually be in
*stationary* phase, not exponential.
For exponential growth, try somewhere between 3 and 5 hours after
inoculation.
Personally, I've had success using the TSS method (PEG3350 Laxative and
Store-brand "Epsom Salt" Magnesium Chloride, no DMSO) by growing cells
at 30C, waiting for 3 hrs after inoculation before harvesting
exponential cells for transformation. I used overnight-grown cells to
inoculate fresh culture that morning, so the cells weren't that
exhausted. I used a centrifuge to concentrate cells before
transformation, but you don't have to; you can directly dilute growing
cells with 2x TSS transformation medium, instead.
When growing cells without a shaker, try to grow them at the bottom of a
wide-bottomed flask in a thin layer of broth, 3-5mms deep, so that
oxygen can penetrate. Give them an occasional stir/shake to break up
biofilms and encourage even growth.
--
www.indiebiotech.com
twitter.com/onetruecathal
joindiaspora.com/u/cathalgarvey
PGP Public Key: http://bit.ly/CathalGKey
> The diameter is 95 mm and height of the agar is approximately 5mm.
> So I calculated to have around 140ml of agar in the petri dish.
>
> Now I have to get ampicillin, dilute it in water. Then spread the amp-
> water over the plate to make it an amp-agar.
>
I'm not fully sure but why not add the amp into the bacteria you're
going to plate? Is this a bad idea?
> 100ug/ml amp ws mentioned. So I would need around 15 mg of ampicillin.
> Shall I better take 20 to be sure it works??
>
Sounds like a lot of amp. The ampicillin I use is 1:1000 dilution of
100mg/mL stock solution, so its 1 uL per 1 mL that I commonly use. I
might be wrong though.
Mega, it looks like you have good math, but the difference is 100ug/mL
is for ampicillin when its MIXED into the agar... you're talking about
spreading it on TOP. While it will diffuse down into the agar, it will
take a while, probably won't be 100% diffused (but you only care about
the top surface really, but you won't know EXACTLY what concentration
of drug you have at the top because its not completely mixed)
A quick google for "spread spreader ampicillin" brought this up:
http://www.protocol-online.org/biology-forums/posts/36393.html
where the outcome is, you can spread ampicillin on top, but then you
should let the plates dry for a few hours in an incubator (if you had
a laminar flow hood I would dry with the top of the plate open until
you could see the excess water dried up)... they say to let them dry
inverted so you don't get condensation that drips on to the agar
surface (will splash your ampicillin around, and if you HAD put any
bacteria, they could also get splashed and moved around, so always
incubate inverted!)
> Sounds like a lot of amp. The ampicillin I use is 1:1000 dilution of
> 100mg/mL stock solution, so its 1 uL per 1 mL that I commonly use. I
> might be wrong though.
>
Jeswin, if you had plate with 100mL agar, you'd be using 10mg of
ampicillin (1uL/1mL agar, 100mL agar == 100uL amp juice, 100uL==0.1mL,
100mg/mL 100*0.1==10mg)
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
> To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
>
--
Nathan McCorkle
Rochester Institute of Technology
College of Science, Biotechnology/Bioinformatics
By the way, Mega, what is the project you are working on?
I believe chloramphenicol is thermostable; should survive autoclaving.
Not commonly used in DIYbio I imagine though...
--vs;
Look around online for those filters and syringe pistons so you can sterilize your amp. Does the bird variety come in pill form, or paste, or powder, or what?
231.313.9062 // @100ideas // sent from my rotary phone
Venkatesh Srinivas <m...@endeavour.zapto.org> wrote:
>--
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "DIYbio" group.
>To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>diybio+un...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit this group at
>http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
--
Sent from K-9 Mail on Android.
Microwaves don't explicitly damage DNA.
However, UV does, and I would advocate using UV to mince DNA before
disposal, especially if the DNA contains medically significant (i.e.
AmpR, maybe Chlor?) antibiotic resistance genes. Most labs have UV
transilluminators for Gel electrophoresis, even though blue illumination
is more all-round useful (precisely because it doesn't mince DNA).
So, if I were working with E.coli, which can't survive boiling, I'd
simply boil cellular waste in a glass beaker or flask, then put the
container on a UV illuminator for 5 minutes before disposal.
If I were working with B.subtilis, I'd autoclave rather than boiling,
and do the same.
Clearly, I wouldn't be so strict with DNA that was proven to have no
ecological consequences; no resistance genes, no ecological-unknowns. A
plasmid containing only GFP and plasmid maintenance genes is hardly
worth worrying about, for example.
Of course, opinions differ, and we've had animated discussions here in
the past on this issue; whether to bother destroying antibiotics,
whether to bother destroying DNA.
--
And yes, they should be warm. I have successfully transformed E.coli
grown at 30C. I incubate using a terrarium heater mat, a pet-shop
thermostat, and a polystyrene box. I use an external thermometer to
sanity-check the temperature, because commercial pet thermostats are
rarely correct (but very stable, I find).
If using heater wire to heat your terrarium, be careful to insulate the
wire somehow to keep it from melting/igniting the polystyrene!
Ampicillin - most definitely add it to the agar, you want a uniform
concentration of the stuff. Top spreading takes forever. Just add
the amp to your agar mix after it's cooled down to merely "hot" and
not boiling.
Amp is decent at selecting from anywhere around 2ug/mL up to
1000ug/mL, we typically use 50-100ug/mL in the lab. A light "dusting"
per plate by eye is generally enough. 100mg/L will work fine as a
recipe.
Amp is very convenient in that you don't have to wait for the
resistance gene to be expressed before adding it. Since it attacks
cell wall growth and not translation, you can just add it. With
kanamycin, chloramphenicol, etc. you have to wait an hour.
---
Re competent cells: I agree that the TSS competency method is
probably the easiest to get to work in a home lab setting.
electrocompetent preps are even easier but you'd then need to
build/obtain a 2500V exponential wave shocker. (Highly recommend
electrocompetent methods if you want really high competency, i.e. if
you ever want to try a random library screen / selection.)
It is absolutely essential that you use "midlog" exponentially growing
cells for the competency prep. You want the cells rapidly dividing so
that their cell wall hasn't yet fully thickened, as it does once you
get to stationary phase. You'll also probably want to keep the
cultures shaking for the exponential growth phase if you want
highly-competent cells. As soon as you stop their growth keep the
cells rigorously cold at 4deg for the best competency.
-A
Mega this is pretty good info, you should try using a piezo electric
sparker, commonly found in electronic ignition household butane
lighters (the long grill lighters generally have them).
Read the two posts here with info compiled by Simon Quellen Field
about how to use a piezo sparker and a potentiometer to adjust the
voltage, which for E.coli is generally 18kV/cm (or 1.8kV if the
electrodes in the cuvette are 0.1cm apart).
I successfully electroporated mid-log phase (phase is important as
Anselm said) E.coli with no preparation to the cells other than 2
rinses with distilled and filtered water (filtered of ions such that
the resistance of the water is about 18 Mega Ohms) (though distilled
and sterile should be just fine).
I did use a commercial electroporator, and commercial cuvettes (you
have to be careful of the metal used for the electrodes if you make
your own reactor, use gold or platinum, because they are pretty
non-reactive metals if they come into solution from the spark)
Graphite sounds like decent electrodes, only one way to see if it works!
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
> To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
>
--
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
Looks good! I suspect your efficiency really goes down without the
mid-log/exponential phase cells, but you're only trying to get one
plasmid in, so you really don't need good efficiency, as long as 1
cell gets the DNA and can replicate on the antibiotic plate!
With only seven degrees' difference between optimum growth and onset of
heatshock, I imagine a two degree difference (i.e. 40C) makes all the
difference, really. This may be more due to the decreased penetration of
heat energy due to a smaller thermal gradient than any difference to the
E.coli; after all, heat shock response is heat shock response, and it
probably sets in around 39C. But still; one way or another, it probably
does make a little difference.
However, I wouldn't expect tenfold reductions in efficiency over a
degree or so of difference; if you were expecting 80 colonies and only
got 8, is it possible that your DNA is toxic? Has the expression system
or whatever you're using been tested previously in E.coli? Gene toxicity
is a real thing; sometimes the most innocuous seeming genes can be toxic
when introduced into another species. With several hundred thousand
different molecules whizzing around inside a cell, it's not surprising
that sometimes you'll just get an incompatibility cropping up.
Also, if efficiency isn't a concern, the PEG/Mg method really does take
less time and effort. It's comparably efficient to a regular CaCl
transformation, but I don't know if you can push it up to the ideal CaCl
transformation frequencies used for libraries. But still; it works great
for routine transfections, and takes less time, thought and effort to
do. And no water baths.
1 or 2 or 8 colonies is really low for a transformation regardless of
the protocol. In my experience and reading, the heat shock temperature
and time doesn't really matter for pass/fail, those are knobs you turn
for tuning efficiency with a particular host strain.
I would look at the rest of your experiment, did you pre-chill all
your pipette tips, CaCl2 rinse solution, eppendorf tubes and other
consumables that were involved with the E.coli in a freezer for an
hour or so? Were you sure to be gentle with the cold E.coli to avoid
shear stress? Were you sure to go directly from an ice bath to heat
shock and back to an ice bath? Quick temperature swings are likely to
be a more important factor, you need the thermal gradient to be as
strong as possible, which means taking the ice bucket with your
chilled cells+DNA over to the water bath and moving as fast as you
can.
Are you recovering with SOC media, or just LB? Are you shaker
incubating for an hour before adding selective pressure?
> I would look at the rest of your experiment, did you pre-chill all
> your pipette tips, CaCl2 rinse solution, eppendorf tubes and other
> consumables that were involved with the E.coli in a freezer for an
I had my competent cells thaw on ice. I put my tips and tubes on ice,
but not 1 hour; more like 5 to 10 minutes. After mixing gently (finger
flick lightly), I left them on ice 30 minutes.
> hour or so? Were you sure to be gentle with the cold E.coli to avoid
> shear stress? Were you sure to go directly from an ice bath to heat
> shock and back to an ice bath? Quick temperature swings are likely to
I tried to be very careful with the cells, never letting them off the
ice more than a quick second to pipet them out. Ice to bath to ice,
less than a second in the air. Then I incubate for 45 minutes after
which I plated them.
> be a more important factor, you need the thermal gradient to be as
> strong as possible, which means taking the ice bucket with your
> chilled cells+DNA over to the water bath and moving as fast as you
> can.
>
> Are you recovering with SOC media, or just LB? Are you shaker
> incubating for an hour before adding selective pressure?
After the 45 minutes in shaker incubator at 37 degrees, I added 0.3 mL
LB. What is selective pressure?
Did you just get done with a ligation though?
>
>> I would look at the rest of your experiment, did you pre-chill all
>> your pipette tips, CaCl2 rinse solution, eppendorf tubes and other
>> consumables that were involved with the E.coli in a freezer for an
>
> I had my competent cells thaw on ice. I put my tips and tubes on ice,
> but not 1 hour; more like 5 to 10 minutes. After mixing gently (finger
> flick lightly), I left them on ice 30 minutes.
>
>> hour or so? Were you sure to be gentle with the cold E.coli to avoid
>> shear stress? Were you sure to go directly from an ice bath to heat
>> shock and back to an ice bath? Quick temperature swings are likely to
>
> I tried to be very careful with the cells, never letting them off the
> ice more than a quick second to pipet them out. Ice to bath to ice,
> less than a second in the air. Then I incubate for 45 minutes after
> which I plated them.
>
>> be a more important factor, you need the thermal gradient to be as
>> strong as possible, which means taking the ice bucket with your
>> chilled cells+DNA over to the water bath and moving as fast as you
>> can.
>>
>> Are you recovering with SOC media, or just LB? Are you shaker
>> incubating for an hour before adding selective pressure?
>
> After the 45 minutes in shaker incubator at 37 degrees, I added 0.3 mL
Wait, you added the recovery media AFTER incubating? You're supposed
to do that (immediately or 2 minutes, can't remember which) after the
heat shock and transfer to ice again.
> LB. What is selective pressure?
antibiotics, etc...
Overview of CaCl2 Transformation Protocol:
Pre-chill these reagents - CaCl2 solution (20-50mM), E. coli,
plasmids, (4) 15mL orange-capped tube, (3) fresh 1mL tubes
add 15ml E.coli to orange-capped tube, spin at 2700g for 10 mins
decant supernatant, a little leftover is OK
add CaCl2 solution (5-30mL)
chill up to 20 mins
spin at 2700g for 10 mins, decant supernatant, resuspend in 1mL CaCl2
chill up to 20 mins
transfer 200uL of E.coli to each of (3) fresh 15mL orange-capped tubes
spin plasmids 15-30 seconds, transfer 10uL of each to a respectively
labeled tube
chill 20-30 mins
heat shock for 45-90 seconds, then immediately transfer to ice
after 1-2 mins, add 600-800uL LB broth (SOC is better)
place in 37 degree C incubator (can be shaking but at less than 50
RPM) for 45-60 mins
plate each transformant culture on appropriate antibiotic selection media
(originally posted here:
http://groups.google.com/group/diybio/browse_thread/thread/fa9fd3c4df71d8d0#msg_e609ce6a73333d5e
)
> Wait, you added the recovery media AFTER incubating? You're supposed
> to do that (immediately or 2 minutes, can't remember which) after the
> heat shock and transfer to ice again.
>
My mistake, I read my notes wrong. I did add the LB after the 2
minutes on ice after heat shock
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Mega <masters...@gmail.com> wrote:
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
> To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
>
--
Did you give it a mL or 2 of media after the heatshock then 2 minutes on ice?
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
Do you have a centrifuge?
You can make a form of LB cheaply at home using
digestive-aid-tablets/meat tenderiser (1tsp) to digest soy protein
(dissolve both in water, leave to work for a few hours), and adding
yeast extract and salt. Then filter coarsely, filter finely, filter
until clear. Then add agar if desired, or leave out for broth, and
sterilise by pressure cooker.
The recipe for LB (Lysogeny Broth) is:
10g digested protein (usually casein, soy in this case)
5g Yeast Extract (No-added-salt, or balance by adding less salt below)
2/5/10g salt, depending on who you ask.
Technically my way is closer to "tryptic soy broth" because it uses soy
protein rather than casein. I don't think it's worth trying to make
casein hydrolysate (AKA "Tryptone") at home, because most off-the-shelf
"milk protein" will contain a lot of lactose, which will interfere with
IPTG-inducible gene cassettes. Easier to avoid entirely and go with soy
protein.
Keep the DNA until you can do a transformation with liquid media. As
before, I suggest PEG/Mg for a beginner, but if you're doing CaCl, you
*have* to do it right, or it won't work.
Remember, CaCl isn't about *adding* CaCl; it's about washing away the
original medium using a centrifuge, and repeatedly re-suspending the
bacteria in CaCl at 4C. It's boring and time-consuming, but if you just
add CaCl and DNA and heat-shock, nothing will happen.
In contrast, if you just add cold (4C) LB with 20% PEG-3350 and 10g/L
MgSO4 to chilled exponential-phase cells, and add DNA, and leave on ice
for 30 minutes, something will probably happen. But again, it *has* to
be liquid broth for this to work well.
I digest the soy with bromelain rather than trypsin, and I add an excess
of bromelain to overcome the natural trypsin inhibitors* in soy protein.
To calculate the excess, read how they calculate the strength of the
bromelain; it's usually listed in "Gelatin-digesting units", where a
unit can prevent X grams of gelatin from polymerising. I'd double the
dose needed to digest the weight of soy protein you're working with; if
1g bromelain digests 10g gelatin, use 2g bromelain to digest 10g soy
protein.
It's not scientific, but my E.coli cells grow on it, so I don't much
care right now. When I get into more specific requirements for
high-yield or precisely replicable growth, that's another matter, but
right now I use E.coli as a vector-carrier and little else. :)
*Trypsin inhibitors probably inhibit the function of the active site, a
triad of catalytic amino acids that are shared AFAIK with bromelain; so,
I assume they inhibit bromelain, also.
Alternatively again, look for "meat tenderiser", sold by some butchers
or supermarkets; it's usually just bromelain powder. :)
I don't know if it will work well from agar. My suggestion is; it's your
first transformation. Try to reduce any points where it *might* fail, so
that if it does go wrong, you'll find it easier to fix.
Here is a CaCl2 guide that is well written by a professor of mine.
I've done this, it gives insane numbers of colonies, it DOES work when
you follow the steps. You will save yourself a lot of time by
understand WHY you're doing each step of a protocol, and what the
implications of adjusting parameters may be... or you'll never do
anything new... the difference between a car mechanic and a car
parts-changer is that the mechanic understands the machine and can
thus diagnose new problems and/or surmount unforeseen challenges.
http://people.rit.edu/rhrsbi/GEPages/LabManualPDF5ed/21Transformation.pdf
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
> To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
Then sterilise by pressure cooking for 20 mins.
Mega <masters...@gmail.com> wrote:
>--
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "DIYbio" group.
>To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>diybio+un...@googlegroups.com.
>For more options, visit this group at
>http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
--
Sent from K-9 Mail on Android
However, they will take a little time to "wake up", the so-called "lag phase". The lag phase will be longer for cells just out of the fridge than for cells grown from a just-exhausted overnight, so you'll have to wait longer before they are ready.
For ease of guessing, assume your cells are ready when the broth is cloudy when swirled, but not opaque! If it looks like cloudy lemonade, still transparent but cloudy, it's probably about right.
Mega <masters...@gmail.com> wrote:
You can put an aquarium heater in a large jar with water. Without water the heater will overheat and break the glass as the thermostat still is sensing cool air.
Cheers Brian
On 25 Feb 2012 18:19, "Dakota Hamill" <dko...@gmail.com> wrote:
Ah I see, you are right. It won't be a steady stream of warm air.I thought people had success using aquarium heaters without water as well?
--
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
> To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
>
--
I have a question on what microscope to get to start off with. I read about the 1000x power being good for seeing better details of cells is that something I should consider or would something will lesser power work? Also I want to get my two kids (6 and 8 years old) involved with this as well as the have expressed an interest.
So what is a good microscope to consider and what are some good sources? I don't want to go crazy overboard on the microscope but don't mind spending a little extra for quality.
Thanks
Check out american science and surplus. You want 400x at least for bacteria, at 400x they look like tiny dots swimmong around. 1000x is nice, just tenderness you need immersion oil. Oil is cheap, just don't forget to get it. On a macro level, you can look at interesting colony morphology pretty easily with a dissecting microscope.
--A
You can easily test a microscope's quality by placing your cell phone
under the lens with the backlight on, the three colored pixels should
be clear and not wavy/grainy (indicating bad lenses or dust in the
optical path).
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
> To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
>
--
404 Error - Page not found
Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be available anymore. If you have it,
could you please upload it somewhere else?
cheers
http://people.rit.edu/rhrsbi/GEPages/LabManual.html
Google "rit rothman" and this is on his genetic engineering page
In addition to Simon's advice that scopes without condensers are toys,
I would add that if the scope comes with an objective and they don't
specify* the NA of the objective, just the magnification, it's
_probably_ a toy. If they don't tell you the NA, it's probably
ridiculously low. The manufacturers of toy microscopes like to
advertise stupidly large magnifications, which doesn't tell you
anything about how small it will resolve.
* Sometimes the NA is specified in parentheses next to the
magnification. 60x (0.9) would mean 60 times magnification with a
numerical aperture of 0.9.
-cory