Right on their front webpage they advertise they will generate & assemble 680Mb of sequence (from an Illumina machine) for the paltry sum of $4.7K. Wow! That would fit on my credit card when I was a graduate student (though it would have been a few months stipend). 680Mb is 100+X coverage of an E.coli-class genome, or about 50X coverage of Saccharomyces. It's even well over 0.5X coverage of an awful lot of interesting eukaryotes.
At first I scoffed at the high prices, but now I see this and Tito's
message and there seems to be some opportunities here. Does anyone
have some organisms that should be model organisms that need to be
sequenced, and why they haven't been sequenced before, or what would
sequencing allow us to accomplish specifically?
I also note this line on the Cofactor Genomics page:
human genome: $22,900
(22,900/50 = 458)
So, what if we did a sequencing lottery? A lottery ticket will have a
minimum price of $50, and anything higher is acceptable; remaining
money raised will go back into diybio somehow (this needs to be more
thoroughly written up); whoever is the lucky winner- either by random
draw or nomination by the community- will have their genome sequenced,
and more importantly be given the digital data as well. Maybe there
will be a few provisions- such as releasing the information into the
public domain or under some license in particular so that this
information can be used by the community- or something else like that.
What do you think?
Right. I don't know if anyone else is interested in being able to
modify this list to say "James Watson, Craig Venter," and "and
Mackenzie Cowell" or "and Tito Jankowski, some random DIYbio fellow
spokesperson for amateurs every where". You know you want to.
> The only case that I could see it worthwhile to sequence a human genome at
> this point is in the case of the father in this article
> http://www.wired.com/medtech/genetics/magazine/17-02/ff_diygenetics whose
> daugther has a rare genetic disorder.The nation's finest medical experts
> are all baffled by the girl's strange array of symptoms so has decided to
> dig into her genetic code and find the answer himself.
Yes, that's certainly a case where it is very worthwhile, and actually
has immediate practical results.
> But even then (1) is it more worthwhile to sequence only some regions of
> interest on the genome of the girl (and some other family members for
> comparison) then to do a full blown complete genome analysis, and (2) even
Well, SNP analysis via 23andme or deCODEme is certainly an option.
Maybe my suggestion can be transformed into a separate snp sequencing
lottery, although I would really still like to be able to add an
amateur- any amateur- to the list of genomes decoded and in the public
domain.
> That said, if the community can agree on a good organism to sequence I would
> be more then willing to hip in $100 as well, and help out with the
> bioinformatics analysis.
Me too.