Hey now, that's not quite fair. :) If you have any constructive
suggestions on the grab bag, be my guest -- I've been lacking creative
insights into organizing something like that. A collection of links
versus a collection of links plus the actual content has little
difference. :-/ I'm wondering where I can dump my 12,000 bookmarks re:
protocols (that are relevant - maybe 1/12th) to this little 'hackathon'
on del.icio.us or whatever it is. Here is my ADR file:
http://heybryan.org/bookmarks/2008-06-09_opera6.adr
So if you want to play with that, it might be a good place to start.
An older copy in HTML form:
http://heybryan.org/bookmarks/bookmarks-old2/toc.html#3-top
Yeah, that HTML version is very, very old. So, have fun. :)
- Bryan
________________________________________
http://heybryan.org/
I wonder, is there a better way for us to handle picking meeting
times/rsvping? I hate to spam everyone with these "me too" emails...
Toph
Or fill out this html form (may not be viewable in all email clients):
The next DIYbio meeting is Thursday June 19th 7pm @ BetaHouse in Cambridge MA.If you cannot view this form properly, you can fill it out here:
If you plan on attending, please RSVP by providing a few details below:
I'll try that one more time:
The next DIYbio meeting is Thursday June 19th 7pm @ BetaHouse in Cambridge MA.If you cannot view this form properly, you can fill it out here:
If you plan on attending, please RSVP by providing a few details below:
So, one of the ideas I was having for the do-it-yourself biotech kits is
the bioreactor that I mentioned on this mailing list a few weeks ago. I
don't know why nobody has brought it up, but it's a pretty useful idea
for modularizing all of these components and protocols down into
something more usable for the amateur and so on. Instead of requiring
big, bulky setups for typical benchwork, let's reconceptualize it and
integrate the functionality into cells themselves. For example, there's
the in vitro DNA synthesizer:
http://heybryan.org/mediawiki/index.php/In_vitro_DNA_synthesizer
http://heybryan.org/mediawiki/index.php/Bioreactors
The idea there would be that we could use simple input into a biological
system to synthesize DNA in vitro. Hopefully in vivo. That would be
even better. But again we come across the purification issues that we
were discussing earlier. There's also another problem that I have been
running into in the design of the system, mostly the polymerase that
would be necessary, but I've been routing around this particular set
back by investigating the integration of phosphodiester chemistry into
biosynthetic pathways (DTD, for starters, looks proteotoxic, so that's
not a good start).
So that larger process, again, can be on the same scale as debian using
the same general software infrastructure, such as with content
repositories and automated tools, since the majority of biological
informatics out there on the internet is already digital it's made all
that much more easy.
> Over the next month we will put together a comprehensive list of DIY
> resources that already exist online - protocols, equipment
> instructions, educational material - and test out some of the most
> promising experimental techniques, publishing our progress under the
> auspices of diybio.org. We picked out 3 milestones to work towards:
I'll volunteer for those massive reviews. ;-)
> 1. Identify the DIYbio model organism.
There can be more than one.
> * It needs to be safe, forgiving, interesting, and available
> * Candidates include yeast (humanity has a long history of
> engineering it, and it's commonly available), moss (p. patens?), E.
> coli (good because it's well understood, bad because it could be
> pathogenic)
All good options.
> 2. Conduct and informally publish a reproducable "$100
> transformation", inserting something like GFP into the model
> organism, or a similar experiment that would be trivial in an
> academic lab.
So, what I remember from transformation protocols, there's a lot of
proprietary chemicals involved, but that should be abstractable away
from the system anyway. I would prefer a $0, where all of the materials
are biologically produced and purified, or at least a strategy to
eventually come to that, and then the $100 version being one where
we're "almost there" (and by almost I mean, "well, we have a map").
> 3. Form a 2009 DIYbio iGEM team.
:) I'd like to go.
Since it's Boston I'm sure there's enough local people who know how to
set up live streaming video from a web cam. There are also many servers
that would be willing to broadcast the stream freely.
I would think that if you're able to show up in Hong Kong in August,
then that you would be allowed to participate. Why not? Let's put
everybody's name on the team. That's the idea of collaboration, right?
As for actually arranging transportation, that might be a personal
means issue, or maybe some of us in educational institutions can go
poke some advisors for the money to attend, etc.
Thanks to everyone who came out last night to the second meetup - the energy and excitement you all brought was fantastic and I think we are off to a solid start. Besides precipitating DNA from oatmeal, apple, and human saliva, we had a great time tentatively planning out the next couple of months and establishing a draft mission statement and roadmap with milestones:
...
1. Identify the DIYbio model organism.
* It needs to be safe, forgiving, interesting, and available
* Candidates include yeast (humanity has a long history of engineering it, and it's commonly available), moss (p. patens?), E. coli (good because it's well understood, bad because it could be pathogenic)
2. Conduct and informally publish a reproducable "$100 transformation", inserting something like GFP into the model organism, or a similar experiment that would be trivial in an academic lab.
BioRad has a protocol and kit for bacterial transformation, this is of course proprietary material but it can be used as a base for the work, it is sold for educational purposes at $88.