Disruptor-net

Thank you понедельник, 20 марта 2017 г., 11:07:45 UTC+3 пользователь Mendel Monteiro-Beckerman

I've promoted the 3.3.5 release to a full release as we're already using it in our production

After running the pre-release version for a couple of weeks on our test and production servers we

Even after porting the latest disruptor changes to the .NET version the java version is still faster.

I have to agree with you that there is not much buzz around the .net port of the disruptor but there

We do something fairly similar to Thomas' package in our own project however we process and

I've been playing around with Disruptor.NET and noticed that the event processor Run() tasks were

Hi All, I have been experimenting with the Disruptor and I have a few questions mainly about usage...

addition, I downloaded code in zip file from https://github.com/disruptor-net/Disruptor-net (download

hi， I try to transplant Disruptor（java 3.1.1）to net ,Problems are as follows： （class file

On my Core 2 Duo machine, ComputerSpecifications.cs gives an exception on the line L3KBytes = (int)(

If you were to have one per connected client you'd have multiple threads per client, which is

Hi Mabra, The tests are configured with different number of iterations, for instance Unicast1p1c does

Hi All ! I am just trying to use disruptor and started to download, build and test. This just works,

protected void lbtn1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); sb.

That's great Oliver, thanks. V. On Feb 3, 9:29 am, Olivier <m...@odeheurles.com> wrote:

Events processors generaly run for the full lifetime of the application so this task scheduler does

I've check-in a TaskScheduler which contains a thread pool and pin each thread to a core:

This is what Monitor (lock) does but this is not ideal in all scenarios. There is already a strategy

Hi Plamen, I have been pretty busy in the last few weeks and at the same time Martin has been pushing

Hi, Martin has been very productive over the last few weeks and I did not had much time to port the

I think this is due to the chained consumer bug raised I here. http://code.google.com/p/disruptor-net

Eventually the publisher will experience back pressure when the ring buffer is exhausted. We do have

I should also add that the CLR could run on non-Windows platforms/ processor architectures (such as

RX queries are generally OK but as soon as you introduce side effects, on closures for instance, you

Tim, there is no use of an identical generic identifier in a subclass. The parent (RingBuffer) uses

I've made an experimental build: - Implements shared memory, with a shared heap to store member

Why does the OnAvailable method include a sequence number; when is this useful? I note the Java

Thanks for the reply! So you want to share side-effects between consumers? I thought if you wanted to

On my machine, an Intel i7-2600, I'm getting ~15 million ops per second, for UniCast1P1C. None of