Re: No dispatch-lift-json build for 2.10

[Reuben Doetsch]

object Json extends (Response => JValue) {

  def apply(r: Response) =

    (dispatch.as.String andThen JsonParser.parse)(r)

}

This is the only code in the repo. I just added this to a utility package.

Reuben

On Sunday, April 14, 2013 3:37:14 PM UTC-4, Matt Farmer wrote:

Ahoy,

I'm trying to upgrade a project where I use Lift and Dispatch in 2.10, and I can't because (it seems) there was no dispatch-lift-json built for 2.10. This line appears to be the culprit.

https://github.com/dispatch/reboot/blob/master/project/build.scala#L13

Is there any chance of this getting changed and another build getting spun out to Maven Central Real Soon Like™?

Thanks! :)

[Nathan Hamblen]

Yeah there was no lift-json for 2.9.3 so I couldn't do a proper cross build. (Same old story!)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dispatch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dispatch-scal...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

[Adam Rosien]

Perhaps switch to json4s?

[Matt Farmer]

Sorry, but I'd prefer not to. I'm using Lift for the actual webapp, so there's no reason to pull in another package when things will work as-is. Is there any we could have the cross build just exclude the dispatch-lift-json build for 2.9.3. The 2.9 series is binary compatible, so there should be no problem with someone using 2.9.3 using the 2.9.2 version of the artifact.

On Monday, April 15, 2013 2:29:21 PM UTC-4, Adam Rosien wrote:

Perhaps switch to json4s?

On Monday, April 15, 2013, Nathan Hamblen wrote:

Yeah there was no lift-json for 2.9.3 so I couldn't do a proper cross build. (Same old story!)

On April 15, 2013 7:46:42 AM Reuben Doetsch wrote:

object Json extends (Response => JValue) {

  def apply(r: Response) =

    (dispatch.as.String andThen JsonParser.parse)(r)

}

This is the only code in the repo. I just added this to a utility package.

Reuben

On Sunday, April 14, 2013 3:37:14 PM UTC-4, Matt Farmer wrote:

Ahoy,

I'm trying to upgrade a project where I use Lift and Dispatch in 2.10, and I can't because (it seems) there was no dispatch-lift-json built for 2.10. This line appears to be the culprit.

https://github.com/dispatch/reboot/blob/master/project/build.scala#L13

Is there any chance of this getting changed and another build getting spun out to Maven Central Real Soon Like™?

Thanks! :)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dispatch" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dispatch-scala+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dispatch" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dispatch-scala+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

[Nathan Hamblen]

On 04/20/2013 11:56 AM, Matt Farmer wrote:
> Is there any we could have the cross build just exclude the
> dispatch-lift-json build for 2.9.3.

I've been wondering this for years. I think the answer is no, but sbt is
always changing.

Nathan

[Matt Farmer]

It looks like no, but you can dictate a custom mapping for the dependency on Lift JSON by using CrossVersion.fullMapped...

http://www.scala-sbt.org/release/docs/Detailed-Topics/Cross-Build.html

So you could publish a build for dispatch-lift-json under 2.9.3 and it would use the lift-json build for 2.9.2. There would be some compiler warnings in this case, but it would work.

--

Matt Farmer

Web Developer | Blogger

http://matt.frmr.me | http://farmdawgnation.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Dispatch" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/dispatch-scala/38gyXn841-0/unsubscribe?hl=en.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to dispatch-scal...@googlegroups.com.