Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
Ğ Groups Home
Discuss Sudbury Model
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Digest for discuss-sudbury-model@googlegr oups.com - 2 Messages in 2 Topics
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
George Healy  
View profile  
 More options Sep 16 2011, 8:11 am
From: George Healy <gch...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:11:44 -0400
Local: Fri, Sep 16 2011 8:11 am
Subject: Re: [DSM] Digest for discuss-sudbury-model@googlegroups.com - 2 Messages in 2 Topics
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Very interesting points.  I also wonder about those things that lie more in
the realm of taboo ­ especially sexual.
When considering masturbation or sex between students, a lot goes back to
the moral conventions of the parents as to what would be acceptable.
For the school, it probably has more to do with state policy on appropriate
conduct for the children.
Although A S Neil had a very libertarian approach to sexuality, in a sense
he was ³saved² by the government laws and the fact that the children so
wanted to protect the school that they curbed their activities (to some
extent ­ according to Neilıs writing) to avoid getting Summerhill in
trouble.
I see this as a particularly prickly area to deal with, as it pertains to
behaviour that doesnıt necessarily impinge on others, but yet quite often is
viewed as behaviour that should be regulated or prohibited.  Thoughts?

George

On 16-09-2011 06:55, "discuss-sudbury-model@googlegroups.com"


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google