A question!

[Brenda C. B. Rocco]

Good morining!!

how do you do to manage emails and capture the links contained in them?
someone has to define a link or hyperlink?

Att,
Brenda

Em 27 de abril de 2012 09:12, Doug Reside <dougr...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> Is it a double density disk?  is there a hole at the  top directly across
> from the write protect tab?
>
> On Apr 27, 2012 6:18 AM, <digital-...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>
>>   Today's Topic Summary
>>
>> Group: http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/topics
>>
>> disk imaging [4 Updates]
>>
>>  disk imaging
>>
>> "Gueguen, Gretchen (gmg2n)" <gm...@eservices.virginia.edu> Apr 26 06:21PM
>>
>>
>> A question for anyone with more experience in disk imaging than me:
>>
>> I'm imaging some rather old 3.5" floppy disks (late-80s to early 90s)
>> using FTK Imager. A handful of them do not have a recognized file system.
>> Imager can successfully create an image, but the data in the image is
>> completely blank (the hex file just shows all zeros).
>>
>> Am I correct in thinking then that these disks have been corrupted or
>> wiped? Even though my operating system can't recognize a file system, the
>> imaging software should still image whatever data is still there (if there
>> is any), correct? Or should I be using some other method to image these
>> disks?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Gretchen Gueguen
>> Digital Archivist
>> Albert and Shirley Small Special Collections Library
>> University of Virginia
>> PO Box 400110
>> Charlottesville, VA 22904
>> (434) 924-4073
>>
>>
>>
>> "Mark A. Matienzo" <mark.m...@gmail.com> Apr 26 03:02PM -0400
>>
>> Hi Gretchen,
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Gueguen, Gretchen (gmg2n)
>> > Even though my operating system can’t recognize a file system, the
>> > imaging
>> > software should still image whatever data is still there (if there is
>> > any),
>> > correct? Or should I be using some other method to image these disks?
>>
>> If I recall correctly, FTK Imager ultimately relies on the controller
>> for the floppy drive to assist with interpreting the information on
>> the media. If you're using a USB floppy drive, it may be able to image
>> the disk "successfully."
>>
>> I'd try imaging the disk using another solution (i.e. Catweasel,
>> KryoFlux, etc.) and see what you've got.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> --
>> Mark A. Matienzo
>> Digital Archivist, Manuscripts and Archives, Yale University Library
>> Technical Architect, ArchivesSpace
>>
>>
>>
>> Kam Woods <kamw...@gmail.com> Apr 26 03:13PM -0400
>>
>> Slightly OT but if you're not currently a KryoFlux user (or dislike
>> closed hardware solutions) there's a new(er) open source project,
>> DiskFerret, that appears to be ramping up for distribution this
>> summer. Hardware, firmware, software all available via the project
>> page http://discferret.com/wiki/DiscFerret
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Mark A. Matienzo
>>
>>
>>
>> "Gueguen, Gretchen (gmg2n)" <gm...@eservices.virginia.edu> Apr 26 08:02PM
>>
>>
>> It is an external 3.5 to USB drive...but I do have a catweasel card that
>> is currently not in use. I'll see if I can dig up another drive and connect
>> with that. Thanks Mark.
>>
>> And thanks Kam for the reminder about DiscFerret, I haven't looked at it
>> in a while...
>>
>> -Gretchen
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: digital-...@googlegroups.com
>> [mailto:digital-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kam Woods
>> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 3:13 PM
>> To: digital-...@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: [digital-curation] disk imaging
>>
>> Slightly OT but if you're not currently a KryoFlux user (or dislike closed
>> hardware solutions) there's a new(er) open source project, DiskFerret, that
>> appears to be ramping up for distribution this summer. Hardware, firmware,
>> software all available via the project page
>> http://discferret.com/wiki/DiscFerret
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Digital Curation" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to digital-...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> digital-curati...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation?hl=en.
>>
>>
>>
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
>> digital-curation.
>> You can post via email.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an empty message.
>> For more options, visit this group.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Digital Curation" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to digital-...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> digital-curati...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Digital Curation" group.
> To post to this group, send email to digital-...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> digital-curati...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation?hl=en.



--
"Se coisas pequenas te atingirem é porque você está precisando ser
maior do que  tudo isso!!"

[Seth Shaw]

We have not actively captured linked pages in the email sets we
receive. If I were to pursue that path we would likely do a regex
script to identify URLs and toss the list to either WGet or HTTrack
and then bundle the capture along-side the email. Of, course you may
well accidentally capture quite a few phishing and spam URLs, so you
might want to have a human check the list first.

[Simon Spero]

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Seth Shaw <seth....@gmail.com> wrote:

We have not actively captured linked pages in the email sets we receive. If I were to pursue that path we would likely do a regex
script to identify URLs and toss the list to either WGet or HTTrack and then bundle the capture along-side the email. Of, course you may
well accidentally capture quite a few phishing and spam URLs, so you might want to have a human check the list first.

 There are lots of  problems   when trying to do this for anything other than PIM;  an enterprise system might receive emails that contain links which the addressee is authorized to access, but which the enterprise is not.  The url might point to content whose license does not permit archiving.  The links might not be idempotent; the url  might require rely on cookies or data stores not present on the email system, etc.   Conversely, some messages may refer to the content of links at specific point in time, so delaying until the content can be manually reviewed may result in the wrong version of a page being captured. 

White-listing?

Simon