<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>Digital Curation Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation</link>
  <description>Intended to be a collaborative space for people involved in the technical work of digital curation and repository development to share ideas, practices, technology, software, standards, jokes, etc.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [digital-curation] Accessioning workstations</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/6a325f1173b610f9/b868c37a2d738f54?show_docid=b868c37a2d738f54</link>
  <description>
  Alex, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Would you mind providing some more in-depth info on reading CD-DA? I&#39;m &lt;br&gt; reading in cdparanoia&#39;s faq: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;... Cdparanoia will read correct, rock-solid audio data from inexpensive &lt;br&gt; drives prone to misalignment, frame jitter and loss of streaming during &lt;br&gt; atomic reads&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;So would a Plextor drive and/or multiple reads be necessary for extracting WAV
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/6a325f1173b610f9/b868c37a2d738f54?show_docid=b868c37a2d738f54</guid>
  <author>
  matthewjamesmckin...@gmail.com
  (Matthew McKinley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 23:37:20 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [digital-curation] Accessioning workstations</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/6a325f1173b610f9/d4f3ab1b317b5061?show_docid=d4f3ab1b317b5061</link>
  <description>
  Depending on the type of optical media you have in your collection, it &lt;br&gt; may be wise to purchase specialty hardware and obtain specific &lt;br&gt; software for the migration process. In short, optical media workflows &lt;br&gt; can be divided as: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;CD-ROM/CD-R/DVD-ROM: Image disc (be careful of multi-FS discs!) using
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/6a325f1173b610f9/d4f3ab1b317b5061?show_docid=d4f3ab1b317b5061</guid>
  <author>
  alexanderdur...@gmail.com
  (Alexander Duryee)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:21:38 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Digital curator - capability &amp; competence</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/170fd2d12481a470/a399a9ec3f5ac476?show_docid=a399a9ec3f5ac476</link>
  <description>
  Hello Thales, &lt;br&gt; The DigCCurr project has published some draft curricular frameworks for &lt;br&gt; digital curation education, as well as copies of instructional material at &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.ils.unc.edu/digccurr/products.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Best, &lt;br&gt; Christie Peterson
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/170fd2d12481a470/a399a9ec3f5ac476?show_docid=a399a9ec3f5ac476</guid>
  <author>
  christie.s.peter...@gmail.com
  (Christie Peterson)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:16:31 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Accessioning workstations</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/6a325f1173b610f9/951e2eb59afc4823?show_docid=951e2eb59afc4823</link>
  <description>
  Hello All, &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m putting together a budget request for an accessioning workstation and &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m curious what your setups are like. (For this discussion, accessioning = &lt;br&gt; everything up to the point of AIP transfer to archival storage.) &lt;br&gt; I&#39;d really appreciate it if you could take some time out of your Friday to
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/6a325f1173b610f9/951e2eb59afc4823?show_docid=951e2eb59afc4823</guid>
  <author>
  christie.s.peter...@gmail.com
  (Christie Peterson)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:12:18 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [digital-curation] FTK Imager-generated checksums</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/04102675407926b4/523cc56718289657?show_docid=523cc56718289657</link>
  <description>
  Thanks so much--this helps a great deal!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/04102675407926b4/523cc56718289657?show_docid=523cc56718289657</guid>
  <author>
  dorryfch...@gmail.com
  (Dorothy Waugh)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 15:06:34 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [digital-curation] FTK Imager-generated checksums</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/04102675407926b4/c3c00a4224db8f8c?show_docid=c3c00a4224db8f8c</link>
  <description>
  Are you creating raw, aff, or some other image format? Short answer: &lt;br&gt; checksums should match if you are creating raw images but they won&#39;t if you &lt;br&gt; are creating images in another. Long answer: only the raw format keeps the &lt;br&gt; bits in their original order exactly as they came off the disk whereas the &lt;br&gt; others either add metadata, perform compression, or both. FTKImager is
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/04102675407926b4/c3c00a4224db8f8c?show_docid=c3c00a4224db8f8c</guid>
  <author>
  seth.e.s...@gmail.com
  (Seth Shaw)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 19:43:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>FTK Imager-generated checksums</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/04102675407926b4/412166b762f0c89a?show_docid=412166b762f0c89a</link>
  <description>
  Hi all, &lt;br&gt; We have a question about the checksums generated by FTK Imager. Recently we &lt;br&gt; noticed that the checksums generated for our image files by WinMD5 and &lt;br&gt; Checksums For Windows do not match the checksums generated by FTK Imager, &lt;br&gt; whether during the imaging process or later on. &lt;br&gt; For example, I created an image about a month ago using FTK Imager. When I
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/04102675407926b4/412166b762f0c89a?show_docid=412166b762f0c89a</guid>
  <author>
  dorryfch...@gmail.com
  (Dorothy Waugh)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:28:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [digital-curation] CRC and file transfer</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/bf93154e91b4df08/fc23d1bddacd3e15?show_docid=fc23d1bddacd3e15</link>
  <description>
  MD5/SHA-1 are basically free on any modern system compared to the overhead &lt;br&gt; of the actual transfer (e.g. even my 3-year-old laptop can run SHA256 at &lt;br&gt; gigabit ethernet wire speed using a single CPU core; md5/sha1 are &lt;br&gt; considerably faster) so there isn&#39;t a strong pressure to do this for &lt;br&gt; performance grounds unless you have both extremely fast network/storage
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/bf93154e91b4df08/fc23d1bddacd3e15?show_docid=fc23d1bddacd3e15</guid>
  <author>
  ch...@improbable.org
  (Chris Adams)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 16:50:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [digital-curation] CRC and file transfer</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/bf93154e91b4df08/b6fb298c1326b6b2?show_docid=b6fb298c1326b6b2</link>
  <description>
  I use the free TeraCopying all the time when loading materials into dark &lt;br&gt; storage. Like you we generate/verify checksums (SHA256) at other points in &lt;br&gt; the processes (before and after) and TeraCopy is great for a quick and easy &lt;br&gt; copy/verify transfer when you don&#39;t need to retain the checksums from the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/bf93154e91b4df08/b6fb298c1326b6b2?show_docid=b6fb298c1326b6b2</guid>
  <author>
  seth.e.s...@gmail.com
  (Seth Shaw)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 16:34:55 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [digital-curation] CRC and file transfer</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/bf93154e91b4df08/f3902abe17a21409?show_docid=f3902abe17a21409</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;d be interested in responses too. I use TeraCopy personally and &lt;br&gt; somewhat professionally. Haven&#39;t fully adopted professionally because it &lt;br&gt; uses CRC checksums instead of MD5 or better. Unfortunately, the paid &lt;br&gt; version does not allow you to use MD5 either. It&#39;s a great utility. If &lt;br&gt; there are alternatives that use MD5, would love to hear about it!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/bf93154e91b4df08/f3902abe17a21409?show_docid=f3902abe17a21409</guid>
  <author>
  ntall...@gmail.com
  (Nathan Tallman)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 15:55:09 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [digital-curation] CRC and file transfer</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/bf93154e91b4df08/0a5103b987e0087c?show_docid=0a5103b987e0087c</link>
  <description>
  Gretchen, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;We have used that tool successfully here at Illinois. I am not aware of a tool that uses MD5 or SHA checking on both sides. Teracopy been useful to us, since it has caught several failed file transfers and while, while cutting the step of a manual check process, which would complicate the workflow quite a bit unless we were to develop some kind of automated checking tool. (if there is one out there, we&#39;d consider using it.)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/bf93154e91b4df08/0a5103b987e0087c?show_docid=0a5103b987e0087c</guid>
  <author>
  chris.p...@gmail.com
  (Chris Prom)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 15:52:32 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>CRC and file transfer</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/bf93154e91b4df08/8b091e4964b0108c?show_docid=8b091e4964b0108c</link>
  <description>
  Does anyone have any thoughts about using a tool that uses CRC to verify transfer instead of a MD5 or SHA checksum. I was looking at this tool TeraCopy (&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://codesector.com/teracopy&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;) to use to transfer some data from my local machine to network storage because it aids with the speed of transfer. It uses CRC to check that the transfer is complete and the data is fixed and I&#39;m wondering if that would be sufficient without doing a separate check (MD5 checksums are being created for each file as part of accessioning, this would just cut out the step of doing them again and checking post-transfer).
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/bf93154e91b4df08/8b091e4964b0108c?show_docid=8b091e4964b0108c</guid>
  <author>
  gm...@eservices.virginia.edu
  (Gueguen, Gretchen (gmg2n))
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 15:47:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Digital curator - capability &amp; competence</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/170fd2d12481a470/850628025a49d719?show_docid=850628025a49d719</link>
  <description>
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m a LIS under graduating student and I&#39;m researching about Digital &lt;br&gt; Curation. More precisely about preservation metadata. As I&#39;m still on my &lt;br&gt; first steps in this project, I&#39;m collecting resources to read and analyse &lt;br&gt; what to write. So, what I&#39;m having some difficulties to find are the &lt;br&gt; capabilities and competences needed to be a digital curator. I aim to
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/170fd2d12481a470/850628025a49d719?show_docid=850628025a49d719</guid>
  <author>
  thales_so...@id.uff.br
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 18:42:16 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Registration Open: OPF Hackathon (Chapel Hill Edition) - Tackling Real World Challenges with Digital Forensics Tools and Methods</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/f8c3660406655102/2725f89f91df18ae?show_docid=2725f89f91df18ae</link>
  <description>
  Overview &lt;br&gt; The world of digital forensics offers many useful and practical techniques &lt;br&gt; for capturing, understanding and preserving digital collections. This OPF &lt;br&gt; Hackathon will provide participants with a chance to learn about what &lt;br&gt; digital forensics has to offer to the digital preservation community by
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/f8c3660406655102/2725f89f91df18ae?show_docid=2725f89f91df18ae</guid>
  <author>
  kamwo...@gmail.com
  (kamwoods)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 16:54:39 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>job posting: Digital Collections Librarian</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/8cd22f76d0f21323/226c68d5b09b1e8d?show_docid=226c68d5b09b1e8d</link>
  <description>
  *Digital Collections Librarian* &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;*James Madison University* &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;*Libraries &amp;amp; Educational Technologies* &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;James Madison University (JMU) Libraries &amp;amp; Educational Technologies (L&amp;amp;ET) &lt;br&gt; seeks a dynamic, creative, and service-oriented colleague to provide &lt;br&gt; leadership, vision and oversight of JMU Libraries&#39; digital collections. The
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/digital-curation/browse_thread/thread/8cd22f76d0f21323/226c68d5b09b1e8d?show_docid=226c68d5b09b1e8d</guid>
  <author>
  gen...@gmail.com
  (Genya O&#39;Gara)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:28:45 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
