Declaration of autonomous states/provinces
Ratna Sansar Shrestha
Declaration of autonomous states/provinces
I am an apolitical person and have been commenting on policies and programs of various political parties on the basis of merits thereof. I have, for example, wholeheartedly supported the stance taken by UCPNM as to Mahakali treaty being detrimental to Nepal and anti national. However, I am unable to agree with UCPNM’s spate of declaration of various autonomous provinces mainly for following reasons:
Ø Not legitimate: These declarations are not legitimate because one political party doesn’t have authority to declare as such. In other words, UCPNM doesn’t have authority to restructure Nepal in this fashion.
Ø Not democratic: These declarations, by UCPNM, a party with about 40% seats in CA, do not constitute a democratic move. Besides, all other political parties too can go around declaring various provinces of their own as such and will still be undemocratic. Unless two-third CA members formally resolve to declare as such, the declarations will not be a democratic exercise.
Ø Unconstitutional: Clause (3) of article 138 of Interim Constitution has expressly stipulated that the final decision relating to state restructuring shall be made by the Constituent Assembly. In this backdrop ex parte declaration of various provinces by UCPNM is being done in contravention of the Interim Constitution.
Ø No due process: The process to restructure is for the CA to finish writing the constitution and, thereafter, promulgate it, in doing which a decision will be reached as to how Nepal is to be restructured. As CA has yet to reach a decision in this respect, the declaration fails to conform to the process envisaged by the Interim Constitution.
Ø Not by “popular” demand: The declaration of these “states” doesn’t conform to popular aspirations. According to the survey conducted by Inter Disciplinary Analysts, only 13.4 percent of the population is in favor of declaration of states/provinces on ethnic or linguistic lines or on the lines of nationalities (vide Table 1 below). In my analysis too this is not in Nepal’s interest and I have written several articles on the subject, which can be viewed at: http:www.ratnasansar.blogspot.com/
Let’s take the case of declaration of Newa Autonomous State, to be made today. According to Table 2 below – result of the same study referred to above, only 22 percent of Newa people are in favor of this and 36 percent opine that “Nepal should not be a federal state”. From this it is clear that people in Nepal aren’t in favor of this type of state restructuring. A consensus needs to be reached as to whether Nepal needs to be restructured and how best to do so in the best interest of the country and people and only then a move should be made towards this.
Ø Not genuine declaration: UCPNM has acceded publicly that the declaration is just “publicity”. Based on this confession on the part of UCPNM, some have even called it “publicity stunt” or a political “farce.” UCPNM should be careful in taking such actions.
Table 1
|
Response choices |
Percentage |
|
It should be based on ethnicity |
13.4 |
|
It should be based on language |
6.1 |
|
It should be based on east-west geography |
14.9 |
|
It should be based on north-south geography |
7.9 |
|
It should be based on economic transactions |
1.0 |
|
It should be based on the present districts and zones |
4.8 |
|
Nepal should not be a federal state |
26.7 |
|
I have only heard the term but have not understood it |
18.1 |
|
Don’t know / Cannot say |
7.1 |
|
Total |
100.0 |
Table 2
|
Responses |
Hill Caste |
Hill Jana-jaati |
Hill Dalit |
Newar |
Madhesi Caste |
Tarai MadhesJana- jaati |
Madhes Dalit |
Muslim |
|
It should be based on ethnicity |
11.6 |
19.9 |
4.5 |
22.0 |
10.0 |
18.5 |
11.8 |
4.5 |
|
It should be based on language |
5.4 |
5.7 |
6.8 |
6.0 |
8.6 |
4.8 |
3.8 |
9.1 |
|
It should be based on geography (east-west) |
13.2 |
7.1 |
11.2 |
6.0 |
25.7 |
18.9 |
33.1 |
18.2 |
|
It should be based on geography (north-south) |
9.9 |
6.8 |
0.0 |
8.0 |
8.1 |
4.4 |
10.6 |
4.5 |
|
It should be based on economic transactions |
1.6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2.0 |
0.4 |
2.9 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
It should be based on the present districts and zones |
5.2 |
4.1 |
4.7 |
2.0 |
5.5 |
6.3 |
3.2 |
4.5 |
|
Nepal should not be a federal state |
25.9 |
26.3 |
35.1 |
36.0 |
26.0 |
16.6 |
35.8 |
27.3 |
|
I have only heard the term but have not understood it |
17.7 |
23.7 |
25.1 |
10.0 |
12.6 |
24.6 |
0.0 |
22.7 |
|
Don’t Know / Cannot Say |
9.5 |
6.3 |
12.5 |
8.0 |
3.0 |
2.9 |
1.8 |
9.1 |
|
Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
With
best regards,
Sincerely,
Ratna Sansar Shrestha, fca
Senior Water Resource Analyst
http:www.ratnasansar.blogspot.com/
PO Box 12058, Kathmandu
Telephone: +977 1 435-4698
Telephone/Facsimile: +977 1 435-1946