On 24 September 2012 19:39, Christian Heimes <christ...@python.org> wrote:
> Am 24.09.2012 17:27, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:Given the rate SPDY is changing, complexity of implementation, and
>> I was wondering if it would be worth providing better HTTP 1.1 support
>> - a smart wfile with automatic chunk encoding (which relieves the API
>> What do you think?
> +1 for 3.4
> You proposed gave me another idea. What do you think about SPDY support
that some prerequisites aren't in place (zlib module needs to support
specifying the dictionary), this probably isn't a good idea right
away. It's also easy to get a similar effect using a SPDY-capable
Python-Dev mailing list
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.