I have received the basic information, though as I am in South Africa I do not have all the details on this issue, so I will summarize accordingly.
If your activation keys were issued after November 2001 AND are running 4.2.6 your server will automatically shut itself down as of 00:00 GMT Feb 1 2005. I do not know if there is a date between now and that date for this not to occur and if I do hear anything I will post it to the list.
This item was resolved with later releases so upgrade accordingly to 4.2.8.
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
>Phil Slater at Tuesday, February 1, 2005 >I have received the basic information, though as I am in South Africa I >do not have all the details on this issue, so I will summarize >accordingly.
>If your activation keys were issued after November 2001 AND are running >4.2.6 your server will automatically shut itself down as of 00:00 GMT >Feb 1 2005. I do not know if there is a date between now and that date >for this not to occur and if I do hear anything I will post it to the >list.
>This item was resolved with later releases so upgrade accordingly to >4.2.8.
>############################################################# >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> >To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> >Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
On 01.02.2005 11:47 Uhr "Phil Slater" <psla...@stalker.com> wrote:
> If your activation keys were issued after November 2001 AND are running > 4.2.6 your server will automatically shut itself down as of 00:00 GMT > Feb 1 2005. I do not know if there is a date between now and that date > for this not to occur and if I do hear anything I will post it to the > list.
My license was issued before November 2001 AND i was running 4.2.5 (not 4.2.6) and my Server shut down this night.
So the information you posted above is at least incomplete.
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:47:14 +0200, Phil Slater <psla...@stalker.com> wrote: > This item was resolved with later releases so upgrade accordingly to > 4.2.8.
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ozmiroid" <ozmir...@gmail.com> To: "CommuniGate Pro Discussions" <CGate...@mail.stalker.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 7:42 AM Subject: Re: CommuniGate Pro Stopping SUMMARY
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:47:14 +0200, Phil Slater <psla...@stalker.com> > wrote: >> This item was resolved with later releases so upgrade accordingly to >> 4.2.8.
> ############################################################# > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> > To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> > Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
> It is a time bomb. The question what other time bomb are still in the > server.
Cordialement,
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Antoine LAGIER" <antoine.lag...@algodata.fr> To: "CommuniGate Pro Discussions" <CGate...@mail.stalker.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 7:45 AM Subject: Re: CommuniGate Pro Stopping SUMMARY
Very important information for us ....
Le 1 févr. 05, à 13:43, John Keown a écrit :
> It is a time bomb. The question what other time bomb are still in the > server.
Cordialement,
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
Very nice (admittedly the webmail is not as nice as David Bakker or Nicolas Haiter's improved Stalker skins). They are very upfront as to what their maint. costs are and a pretty helpful mailing list.
They will also entertain suggestions instead of ignoring their users or worse telling them how stupid they are (like stalker has done on occasion).
I already have a 100,000 user license and have been moving my domains over to it.
John Keown wrote: > I for one will not believe what stalker says. I am looking for a > replacement.
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Antoine LAGIER" > <antoine.lag...@algodata.fr> > To: "CommuniGate Pro Discussions" <CGate...@mail.stalker.com> > Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 7:45 AM > Subject: Re: CommuniGate Pro Stopping SUMMARY
> Very important information for us ....
> Le 1 févr. 05, à 13:43, John Keown a écrit :
>> It is a time bomb. The question what other time bomb are still in the >> server.
> Cordialement,
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
Because there was no bugfix, nor was this a bug in the first place.
I'm merely speculating... I have no evidence to prove this, but here's my thoughts...
Stalker decides to kick the prices up by several times, and in order to get their customer base to upgrade, they announce that even though they always tell people to upgrade to the latest software because they don't release bugfix only updates, they will begin to enforce the license which says only 2-years of updates are free.
They then put a timebomb into the next version of Communigate Pro so that there will be more than just words behind their legal threat.
They then catch a lot of flak about pricing and licensing and all of a sudden they realize that in many countries (including US) it's actually illegal to put a hidden timebomb into a program.
So they quietly release the next version with the timebomb removed and figure everyone out there upgrades right away with every new version.
Of course with the license fuss they raised, many people were afraid to upgrade to any newer versions because of fear that not only are they not entitled to, but maybe some later version will simply not work at all with older license keys. Not to mention that many (if not most?) people will either wait to upgrade until any known bugs are found, or they don't upgrade at all if there's no benefit (no bugs affecting them, no new features they desire).
And so now here we are, Feb. 1 2005 after their time-bomb has hit (it must be something that only happens when the date actually rolls from one day to the next, since some folks had rolled their servers forward months and even years and the server ran fine), and they're calling it a "bug".
I find it hard to believe that an "accidental" "bug" would shut down the server at midnight GMT on Feb 1 of 2005 for only certain license keys generated in a certain timeframe. Yeah...sure.
The REALLY annoying part is that when asked point blank if there was a time-bomb in CGP, Vladimir wouldn't answer.
I'd suggest that anyone who was affected by this and lives in a country where timebombs like this are illegal has a very good case to bring against Stalker, and it could be a class-action civil suit.
How many programmers are there at Stalker and how soon can we get a lawyer to file suite and issue subpoenas for testimony regarding deliberate introduction of a timebomb? Should we start a pool on when the first lawsuit gets slapped on Stalker?
> -----Original Message----- > From: CommuniGate Pro Discussions > [mailto:CGate...@mail.stalker.com] On Behalf Of Ozmiroid > Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 4:42 AM > To: CommuniGate Pro Discussions > Subject: Re: CommuniGate Pro Stopping SUMMARY
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:47:14 +0200, Phil Slater > <psla...@stalker.com> wrote: > > This item was resolved with later releases so upgrade > accordingly to > > 4.2.8.
> ############################################################# > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To > switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> > To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to > <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries > to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
> Because there was no bugfix, nor was this a bug in the first place.
> I'm merely speculating... I have no evidence to prove this, but > here's my > thoughts...
> Stalker decides to kick the prices up by several times, and in order > to get > their customer base to upgrade, they announce that even though they > always > tell people to upgrade to the latest software because they don't > release > bugfix only updates, they will begin to enforce the license which > says only > 2-years of updates are free.
> They then put a timebomb into the next version of Communigate Pro so > that > there will be more than just words behind their legal threat.
> They then catch a lot of flak about pricing and licensing and all of > a > sudden they realize that in many countries (including US) it's > actually > illegal to put a hidden timebomb into a program.
> So they quietly release the next version with the timebomb removed > and > figure everyone out there upgrades right away with every new > version.
> Of course with the license fuss they raised, many people were afraid > to > upgrade to any newer versions because of fear that not only are they > not > entitled to, but maybe some later version will simply not work at > all with > older license keys. Not to mention that many (if not most?) people > will > either wait to upgrade until any known bugs are found, or they don't > upgrade > at all if there's no benefit (no bugs affecting them, no new > features they > desire).
> And so now here we are, Feb. 1 2005 after their time-bomb has hit > (it must > be something that only happens when the date actually rolls from one > day to > the next, since some folks had rolled their servers forward months > and even > years and the server ran fine), and they're calling it a "bug".
> I find it hard to believe that an "accidental" "bug" would shut down > the > server at midnight GMT on Feb 1 of 2005 for only certain license > keys > generated in a certain timeframe. Yeah...sure.
> The REALLY annoying part is that when asked point blank if there was > a > time-bomb in CGP, Vladimir wouldn't answer.
> I'd suggest that anyone who was affected by this and lives in a > country > where timebombs like this are illegal has a very good case to bring > against > Stalker, and it could be a class-action civil suit.
> How many programmers are there at Stalker and how soon can we get a > lawyer > to file suite and issue subpoenas for testimony regarding deliberate > introduction of a timebomb? Should we start a pool on when the > first > lawsuit gets slapped on Stalker?
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
----- Original Message ----- From: "eLists" <li...@ehome.net> To: "CommuniGate Pro Discussions" <CGate...@mail.stalker.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 11:22 AM Subject: Re: CommuniGate Pro Stopping SUMMARY
Count me in. I will gladly be part of a lawsuit against Stalker.
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:48:19 -0800 "Aaron" <aa...@madpoo.com> wrote: > Because there was no bugfix, nor was this a bug in the first place.
> I'm merely speculating... I have no evidence to prove this, but > here's my > thoughts...
> Stalker decides to kick the prices up by several times, and in order > to get > their customer base to upgrade, they announce that even though they > always > tell people to upgrade to the latest software because they don't > release > bugfix only updates, they will begin to enforce the license which > says only > 2-years of updates are free.
> They then put a timebomb into the next version of Communigate Pro so > that > there will be more than just words behind their legal threat.
> They then catch a lot of flak about pricing and licensing and all of > a > sudden they realize that in many countries (including US) it's > actually > illegal to put a hidden timebomb into a program.
> So they quietly release the next version with the timebomb removed > and > figure everyone out there upgrades right away with every new > version.
> Of course with the license fuss they raised, many people were afraid > to > upgrade to any newer versions because of fear that not only are they > not > entitled to, but maybe some later version will simply not work at > all with > older license keys. Not to mention that many (if not most?) people > will > either wait to upgrade until any known bugs are found, or they don't > upgrade > at all if there's no benefit (no bugs affecting them, no new > features they > desire).
> And so now here we are, Feb. 1 2005 after their time-bomb has hit > (it must > be something that only happens when the date actually rolls from one > day to > the next, since some folks had rolled their servers forward months > and even > years and the server ran fine), and they're calling it a "bug".
> I find it hard to believe that an "accidental" "bug" would shut down > the > server at midnight GMT on Feb 1 of 2005 for only certain license > keys > generated in a certain timeframe. Yeah...sure.
> The REALLY annoying part is that when asked point blank if there was > a > time-bomb in CGP, Vladimir wouldn't answer.
> I'd suggest that anyone who was affected by this and lives in a > country > where timebombs like this are illegal has a very good case to bring > against > Stalker, and it could be a class-action civil suit.
> How many programmers are there at Stalker and how soon can we get a > lawyer > to file suite and issue subpoenas for testimony regarding deliberate > introduction of a timebomb? Should we start a pool on when the > first > lawsuit gets slapped on Stalker?
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
On 01.02.2005 16:48 Uhr, Aaron <aa...@madpoo.com> wrote:
> So they quietly release the next version with the timebomb removed and > figure everyone out there upgrades right away with every new version.
You nailed it. And that is what hurts me the most in this disaster.
I tried to stay as honest as possible. My license only allowed me to run up to 4.1.8, but by the time we were informed about this, i was already running a more recent version also due to fixes of serious bugs. I was in negotiations with Stalker sales since back when the new license disaster started and was quite sure to upgrade anyway (i did today - new key received an hour ago).
Now, being an honest guy, i stayed with a version from October 2004 which was 4.2.5 - i did NOT update anymore neither to 4.2.6 nor 4.2.7 nor 4.2.8. And now it seems i wouldn't have this mess this morning if i wouldn't had been so honest and just would have upgraded to 4.2.8.
Lesson learned.
Time for a 180 Degree turn around in Stalkers attitudes i might say. How can they try so hard to put them selves out of business. And not a single word or apoligy from Vlad.
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 17:34:38 +0100 Stefan Seiz <TalkLi...@index-s.de> wrote:
> On 01.02.2005 16:48 Uhr, Aaron <aa...@madpoo.com> wrote:
[snip]
> Lesson learned.
> Time for a 180 Degree turn around in Stalkers attitudes i might say. > How can they try so hard to put them selves out of business. > And not a single word or apoligy from Vlad.
You have to be sorry for your actions in order to apologize. I very much doubt he is sorry for this. If he were, he would not have instructed the programmers to implement the time bomb in the first place. Why not simply not let newer versions of the software work with older keys instead of putting a time-bomb in place? Why not be honest - unfortunately Vlad et al have proven themselves to be very unethical and underhanded.
I will do my part in letting people know to stay away from any Stalker product in the future - this will also be good information for their competitors to have as part of their sales pitch "We don't install time-bombs in our software"
Lets see in the new comparision charts:
Stalker Everyone else Has time bomb yes no may stop w/o warning yes no will ignore help requests yes no
And don't forget, unless Stalker has unsubscribed the newsgroups from this list, all of this information will be out there for all to know.
> This really puzzles me.
I would suggest it is called greed. Not that I don't think they should be rewarded for their work. But putting a time bomb in the software is unethical. Stalkers actions makes Microsoft look good! (and that isn't a compliment).
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
> I would suggest it is called greed. Not that I don't think they should > be rewarded for their work. But putting a time bomb in the software is > unethical. Stalkers actions makes Microsoft look good! (and that isn't > a compliment).
Something has changed at Stalker in the last year, - new managers, new owners, new corporate philosophy? CGP is still coded very well (with the major exception of this timebomb code, which obviously did not work as expected by anyone), but customer relations (keeping customers informed, acknowledging customer input) has gone down the tubes.
-- - Ozmiroid
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
> I would suggest it is called greed. Not that I don't think they should > be rewarded for their work. But putting a time bomb in the software is > unethical. Stalkers actions makes Microsoft look good! (and that isn't > a compliment).
Something has changed at Stalker in the last year, - new managers, new owners, new corporate philosophy? CGP is still coded very well (with the major exception of this timebomb code, which obviously did not work as expected by anyone), but customer relations (keeping customers informed, acknowledging customer input) has gone down the tubes.
-- - Ozmiroid
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
From reading the posts this morning, I feel lucky. Running 4.2.7 on an OSX box didn't stop working at 0 hour.. Unfortunately, now it only gives me two copies of each message. -- Peter
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
- People asking for free immediate 24/7 support at 1am in the morning, or any other time?
- Using expired keys on new versions illegally?
- Threatening a class-action suit because they can't do something illegally?
- Involving the FTC, as if their response would be faster (or less expensive) than Stalkers?
- Saying they will hire lawyers ($400/hr) because they want free stuff?
I did upgrade to a new version, but I emailed stalker saying I was going to break the original contract and use more recent terms and can I please upgrade. They told me to do so at a specific version and I did. If they told me to pay for the upgrade then I would have done that before upgrading. What? You think I would do something illegal, or can't read a contract? That's called: Paying a living wage for someone to do work; or asking if I can get something for free, and not expecting free stuff. It is up to them.
Am I obtuse and stupid or something? Am I the only idiot that expects to pay for good software and support? And be gracious, thankful and humble when I get it for free?
If you pay for 24/7 support and have legal keys and have a problem then I assume stalker is working hard for you as any good company will and I am sorry for your difficulty.
thanks!-
-lance
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 12:55 -0500, lbland wrote: > list-
> Sorry, I must be an idiot or something...
> - People asking for free immediate 24/7 support at 1am in the morning, > or any other time?
Stalker should have set their time bomb to go off when their tech-support were at work.
> - Using expired keys on new versions illegally?
They said people who gained their licenses after November 2001 should be able to use 4.2.5 fine. Thus, the timebomb is the illegal part
> - Threatening a class-action suit because they can't do something > illegally?
Read above, though I do not advocate lawsuits.
> - Involving the FTC, as if their response would be faster (or less > expensive) than Stalkers?
No, but perhaps it would encourage stalker to reform their practices in the long term.
> - Saying they will hire lawyers ($400/hr) because they want free stuff?
See above posts about what people were liable to use.
> I did upgrade to a new version, but I emailed stalker saying I was > going to break the original contract and use more recent terms and can > I please upgrade. They told me to do so at a specific version and I > did. If they told me to pay for the upgrade then I would have done that > before upgrading. What? You think I would do something illegal, or > can't read a contract? That's called: Paying a living wage for someone > to do work; or asking if I can get something for free, and not > expecting free stuff. It is up to them.
> Am I obtuse and stupid or something? Am I the only idiot that expects > to pay for good software and support? And be gracious, thankful and > humble when I get it for free?
No, you just haven't read the posts and the licenses correctly
We've paid for the new keys and have had no problems, but that doesn't mean I agree with what has happened to people who are LEGALLY able to use the program and are having problems. -- ------------------------------------------- Paul Chauvet UNIX/Linux Systems Administrator State University of New York at New Paltz 845-257-3828 chauv...@newpaltz.edu -------------------------------------------
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
> software work with > older keys instead of putting a time-bomb in place?
I think that is because you are stealing the software. If you are, then just get keys from a warez site and do it without expecting them to do it for you.
> I will do my part in letting people know to stay > away from any Stalker > product in the future - this will also be good > information for their > competitors to have as part of their sales pitch "We > don't install > time-bombs in our software"
Are we sure there is a bomb? From what I read today, it seems that some people have taken software they do not own, and it does not work.
Sean
___________________________________________________________ ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 18:04 +0000, Dirk Diggler wrote: > Hi;
> Are we sure there is a bomb? From what I read today, > it seems that some people have taken software they do > not own, and it does not work.
> Sean
People need to STOP saying that people are stealing/pirating/using software they don't own.
Read what Stalker's site is saying. You ARE ABLE to use versions up to and including 4.2.8 if you got a license any time after November 2001. People who are LEGALLY ALLOWED to use it STOPPED working due to a timebomb in 4.2.5.
Yes, stalker is remedying this SOMEWHAT by allowing 4.2.8 to be used, but that doesn't change the fact that this is causing/has caused massive problems for people.
-- ------------------------------------------- Paul Chauvet UNIX/Linux Systems Administrator State University of New York at New Paltz 845-257-3828 chauv...@newpaltz.edu -------------------------------------------
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
> No, you just haven't read the posts and the licenses correctly
The license we have is from November 2001 (or thereabouts) states very clearly: "We get 2 years of upgrades and that is that".
Then stalker gave us some freebies. Good for them!
Is anyone using a license key LEGALLY that is not able to install the patch to 4.2.8?
Having code to protect their assets from illegal use is just fine. Maybe they made a mistake and tripped up over legal use, but that happens. Too bad. I am sure they are trying their best.
I would like to hear about LEGAL usages where a problem is not being fixed and where the admins have installed the latest patch or version or whatever you want to call it.
thanks!-
-lance
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:04:22 +0000 (GMT) Dirk Diggler <dirk_diggl...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi;
> Why not simply not let newer versions of the > > software work with > > older keys instead of putting a time-bomb in place?
> I think that is because you are stealing the software. > If you are, then just get keys from a warez site and > do it without expecting them to do it for you.
Maybe the post was confusing, it is saying don't let newer versions of the software wotk with old keys. How can you be stealing something that doesn't work?
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
> On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 18:04 +0000, Dirk Diggler wrote: > > Hi;
> > Are we sure there is a bomb? From what I read today, > > it seems that some people have taken software they do > > not own, and it does not work.
> > Sean
> People need to STOP saying that people are stealing/pirating/using > software they don't own.
they won't stop becuase they think they are better than others that where following Stalkers directions to upgrade.
> Read what Stalker's site is saying. You ARE ABLE to use versions up > to > and including 4.2.8 if you got a license any time after November > 2001. > People who are LEGALLY ALLOWED to use it STOPPED working due to a > timebomb in 4.2.5.
> Yes, stalker is remedying this SOMEWHAT by allowing 4.2.8 to be > used, > but that doesn't change the fact that this is causing/has caused > massive > problems for people.
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
The REALLY annoying part is that when asked point blank if there was a time-bomb in CGP, Vladimir wouldn't answer.
I've had Vlad answer point-blank to me in a private email that such code does not exist. Additionally, our license contract specifically prohibits such action. Does yours?
matto
--m...@snark.net------------------------------------------<darwin>< The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:04:22 +0000 (GMT), Dirk Diggler
<dirk_diggl...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Are we sure there is a bomb? From what I read today, > it seems that some people have taken software they do > not own, and it does not work.
I see many posts where they say they have valid, legal, paid-in-full keys for version 4.2.6. Legal beyond that version? I don't know. I do see that Stalker says the fix for this issue with 4.2.6 is to upgrade to 4.2.8. They don't say "upgrade if you have valid keys for 4.2.8", they just say "upgrade".
I've paid the upgrade license fees to Stalker several times since first buying the product in 2001, most recently in the spring of 2004 - my keys are valid until at least March 2005, confirmed by Stalker. And I was caught dead in the water when the timebomb code hit my server last night.
-- - Ozmiroid
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <CGate...@mail.stalker.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGatePro-...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-dig...@mail.stalker.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePro-in...@mail.stalker.com> Send administrative queries to <CGatePro-requ...@mail.stalker.com>