MAPI Password change?
Tom Rymes
on RedHat 8.0. We are using the latest production release of the MAPI
Connector.
Can my users change their account password from within Outlook?
Also, to keep the Samba, Linux, and CGPro passwords in sync, would the
best method be to Set "Enable OS Password" for each account and use the
Windows 98 Password control panel to change the "Microsoft networking
password" which should, via Samba, change the Linux OS password. In
this scenario, would users technically be able to use either the OS
password or the CGPro password, assuming they are different?
Any thought, ideas, comments, flames, etc appreciated.
Tom
#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <CGat...@mail.stalker.com>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <CGateP...@mail.stalker.com>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <CGatePr...@mail.stalker.com>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <CGatePr...@mail.stalker.com>
Send administrative queries to <CGatePro...@mail.stalker.com>
Technical Support
> My users are using Outlook 2002 to communicate with CGPro 4.0.6 running
> on RedHat 8.0. We are using the latest production release of the MAPI
> Connector.
>
> Can my users change their account password from within Outlook?
No.
> Also, to keep the Samba, Linux, and CGPro passwords in sync, would the
> best method be to Set "Enable OS Password" for each account and use the
> Windows 98 Password control panel to change the "Microsoft networking
> password" which should, via Samba, change the Linux OS password. In
> this scenario, would users technically be able to use either the OS
> password or the CGPro password, assuming they are different?
Yes. The CGPro internal password is tried first, if that does not match, the
server tries to authenticate using OS passwords. Note, for OS passwords to
work SASL authentication methods in mailer clients should be disabled (as to
authenticate to OS the server needs the passwords in the clear text form.)
> Any thought, ideas, comments, flames, etc appreciated.
>
> Tom
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Akindinov
=======================================================================
When answering to letters sent to you by the tech.support staff, make
sure the original message you have received is included into your reply.
Steve Grandi
> Return-Path: <a_s...@hotmail.com>
> X-Real-To: <gra...@noao.edu>
> Received: from semi...@noao.edu
> by noao.edu (CommuniGate Pro GROUP 4.1b7)
> with GROUP id 7586406; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 14:14:51 -0700
> Received: from 24-136-13-88.na.21stcentury.net ([24.136.13.88] verified)
> by noao.edu (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b7)
> with SMTP id 7586405 for sem...@noao.edu; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 14:14:51 -0700
> From: "
> Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 14:14:51 -0700
> Message-ID: <auto-000...@noao.edu>
>
> " <a_s...@hotmail.com>
> To: "Adam SOMEBODY " <sem...@noao.edu>
> Subject: Improved ejaculation
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="windows-1251"
> <html>
>
> <head>
> <meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="en-us">
> <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 5.0">
> <meta name="ProgId" content="FrontPage.Editor.Document">
> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
> <title>Hello</title>
> </head>
>
> <body>
Note the "multiline" From: line .... Ugly! I will leave it to the SMTP lawyers
as to the legality of the header.
But the bad part is that it got through my
rulet that invokes SpamCatcher. The rule is a sequence of From not-in
address-list statements. But the log shows that the above message failed
condition#0 of the rule and the SpamCatcher was not invoked.
So:
1) why did this message fail my rule with From not-in address-list?
2) is there a rule that will catch this message?`
--
Steve Grandi
National Optical Astronomy Observatory/AURA Inc., Tucson AZ USA
Internet: gra...@noao.edu Voice: +1 520 318-8228 FAX: +1 520 318-8360
Bret Miller
interface to change it. We chose to match it with their network password
using the LDAP interface. I wrote my own script because I wanted it work
work a little different than Stalker's. Works well for us.
Bret