New killfile path header to be added
Paul Rooney
wrote:
>Add the following to your killfile:-
>
>/^Path: .*news\.value-news\.net./h
>
>Takes out their latest incarnation.
Thanks, Nell.
--
Paul
My Lake District walking site (updated 29th September 2003):
http://paulrooney.netfirms.com
Please sponsor me for the London Marathon at:
http://www.justgiving.com/london2004
Mark Browne
writes
>Add the following to your killfile:-
>
>/^Path: .*news\.value-news\.net./h
>
>Takes out their latest incarnation.
I was wondering if that could be added without deleting the "useful"
posts. Thanks.
--
Mark Browne
If replying by email, please use the "Reply-To" address, as the
"From" address will be rejected
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
Barker, and I thusly replied:
> Add the following to your killfile:-
>
> /^Path: .*news\.value-news\.net./h
>
> Takes out their latest incarnation.
You don't want other people to see all those wonderful insults of your
good self?
--
The Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
Smiting Revenge Against Sinful Usenet Users Since 1874
"My little finger shall be thicker than my father's loins" - Kings 12:10
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
Rooney, and I thusly replied:
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:32:22 +0000, Ne...@nemesis.nu (Neil Barker)
> wrote:
>
>>Add the following to your killfile:-
>>
>>/^Path: .*news\.value-news\.net./h
>>
>>Takes out their latest incarnation.
>
> Thanks, Nell.
Thanks, Neil.
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
Browne, and I thusly replied:
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, in demon.local, Neil Barker <Ne...@nemesis.nu>
> writes
>>Add the following to your killfile:-
>>
>>/^Path: .*news\.value-news\.net./h
>>
>>Takes out their latest incarnation.
>
> I was wondering if that could be added without deleting the "useful"
> posts. Thanks.
/^Path: .*demon\.co\.uk./h
That will help a lot.
JK
writes
>Add the following to your killfile:-
>/^Path: .*news\.value-news\.net./h
>Takes out their latest incarnation.
Done.
I still have a good laff looking at the crap wot is wrote that I
don't have to read.
All that keyboard wanking for nothing. Total and utter losers.
--
JK.
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
thusly replied:
> In message <181422...@nemesis.nu>, Neil Barker <Ne...@nemesis.nu>
> writes
>
>>Add the following to your killfile:-
>
>>/^Path: .*news\.value-news\.net./h
>
>>Takes out their latest incarnation.
>
> Done.
>
> I still have a good laff looking at the crap wot is wrote that I
> don't have to read.
I think you overestimate the effort required to get a successful goading
such as this.
Paul Rooney
Paul Rooney
wrote:
>Not remotely. Just the usual content-less bile, which is so easily ignored.
>
>Quite amusing to think of the trouble they have to go to these days and
>the amount of crap that they write that no-one sees.
>
>--
>Neil Barker
Phil Koo Koo Kachoo
added onto my boots:
>The Lord alerted my mind to the presence of this EVIL article by Paul
>Rooney, and I thusly replied:
>
>> On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:32:22 +0000, Ne...@nemesis.nu (Neil Barker)
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Add the following to your killfile:-
>>>
>>>/^Path: .*news\.value-news\.net./h
>>>
>>>Takes out their latest incarnation.
>>
>> Thanks, Nell.
>
>Thanks, Neil.
>
Fuck off Neil
--
Phil K.
Cats have evolved one of the most brilliant, brain-taxing games known to Man.
All cats play this game in deadly earnest. It's so exhausting that two hours'
play has to be matched by eight hours' sleep.
The rules appear to be simple but the potential playing area is huge. The
tournament currently being played in my locality of Surrey and West Sussex in
England covers an area of about 300 square kilometres but may be much larger.
It is believed that at least 400 cats are involved at any one time, although
this may be a conservative estimate because, unlike the much simply human
chess, any number can play.
The procedure is that a cat takes up a position where it can keep at least two
other cats under constant surveillance. Anywhere will do: a garage roof, a
wheelie bin, a tree. Additional points may be scored for the number of
additional cats observed. But this may be counter-productive because the object
of the game is to make a move to bring at least two more cats under observation
without the original cats noticing the move.
Careful analysis of the game play reveals that the advantages of gaining a high
vantage point are likely to be negated by the fact that such a position exposes
the cat to observation by corresondingly more cats, thus making it difficult
for it to change positions without its move being noticed. Experienced players
resort to a number of cunning tactics to allay suspicion when they are about to
move. These include closing of eyes as though the player is planning to spend a
long time in its current position. Furious washing is another although the
danger here is that another player might seize the oportunity to make a move.
Really seasoned players exercise remarkable cunning. Crouching under a parked
car may not seem a good vantage point, but provided two other cats can be seen
makes it a valid spot and has the huge advantage of being difficult to be seen,
thus ensuring success for that quick hop onto a garden wall.
A cat that comes under observation by two new cats without noticing their
arrival is required to forfeit a point and retire from the game for an hour.
Being forced to abandon a position by a dog results in the loss of ten points
although five points can be redeemed if the offending dog is given a slashed
nose.
The competition among players to find high-scoring vantage points is fierce.
The search often takes them away from their homebase for anything up to two to
four days at a time. So intense is this remarkable game that not even the hours
of darkness are wasted. Nightime is set aside for settling disputes over scores
and dealing with accusations of cheating.
The above rules have been derived by human observation. All cats are sworn to
secrecy not to divulge anything about the game, and any human showing an
interest results in play that particular node being suspended until the human
gets bored and loses interest.
It is believed that there may be regional variations to the rules. Indeed it
may be that there are many unsuspected refinements. Only detailed reports as a
result of surreptitious observation will enable us humans to compile a complete
set of rules.
Phil Koo Koo Kachoo
>In article: <hL3BGUHZKY4$Ew...@marage.demon.co.uk> JF
><j...@nospam.demon.co.uk> writes:
>>
>> X-No-Archive: yes
>> In message <yZQcAZF+QX4$Ew...@kafana.demon.co.uk.invalid>, Mark Browne
>> <ne...@kafana.demon.co.uk> writes
>> >On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, in demon.local, Neil Barker <Ne...@nemesis.nu>
>> >writes
>> >>Add the following to your killfile:-
>> >>
>> >>/^Path: .*news\.value-news\.net./h
>> >>
>> >>Takes out their latest incarnation.
>> >
>> >I was wondering if that could be added without deleting the "useful"
>> >posts. Thanks.
>>
>> Are there likely to be any useful posts?
>
>Not remotely. Just the usual content-less bile, which is so easily ignored.
How would you know, you've killfiled us all, remember?
>
>Quite amusing to think of the trouble they have to go to these days and
>the amount of crap that they write that no-one sees.
>
Aha!
Phil Koo Koo Kachoo
>Add the following to your killfile:-
>
>/^Path: .*news\.value-news\.net./h
>
>Takes out their latest incarnation.
>
Hey Nelly, you forgot to put your name in the subject. Why's that then?
Phil Koo Koo Kachoo
>In message <181422...@nemesis.nu>, Neil Barker <Ne...@nemesis.nu>
>writes
>
>>Add the following to your killfile:-
>
>>/^Path: .*news\.value-news\.net./h
>
>>Takes out their latest incarnation.
>
>Done.
>
>I still have a good laff looking at the crap wot is wrote that I
>don't have to read.
>
Don't have to, but do. Killfile failure again?
Tony Wright
writes:
>Add the following to your killfile:-
>
>/^Path: .*news\.value-news\.net./h
For Turnpike the hyphen (-) has special meaning and should be escaped
with a backslash (\):
/^Path: .*news\.value\-news\.net./h
Others will have to check their particular implementation.
--
Tony
Phil Koo Koo Kachoo
Thanks Tone.
Pedt
>In article <181422...@nemesis.nu>, Neil Barker <Ne...@nemesis.nu>
>writes:
>
>>Add the following to your killfile:-
>>
>>/^Path: .*news\.value-news\.net./h
>
>For Turnpike the hyphen (-) has special meaning and should be escaped
>with a backslash (\):
>
> /^Path: .*news\.value\-news\.net./h
>
--
Pedt
Phil Koo Koo Kachoo
>In article: <OIXr+ELFAe4$Ew...@saska.demon.co.uk> Tony Wright
>Ahah. I can't say I'm up on Keptruin reg-exps - I'm just re-writing yours
>:-)
>
Can't even get that right. Stupid Nelly, go stand in the corner.
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
Barker, and I thusly replied:
> In article: <OIXr+ELFAe4$Ew...@saska.demon.co.uk> Tony Wright
> Ahah. I can't say I'm up on Keptruin reg-exps - I'm just re-writing
> yours
>:-)
You've already told us this. Fucked it up again, I see.
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
Ogilvie, and I thusly replied:
>
> In article <878545...@nemesis.nu>, Neil Barker <Ne...@nemesis.nu>
> writes
>>In article: <OIXr+ELFAe4$Ew...@saska.demon.co.uk> Tony Wright
>><a...@saska.demon.co.uk> writes:
>>>
>>Ahah. I can't say I'm up on Keptruin reg-exps - I'm just re-writing
>>yours
>>:-)
>>
> But we all know that you are not an expert on Turnpike, Neil :-)
>
> OTOH, it was extremely kind of you to offer your (not quite expert
> enough) help to those of us sensible enough to use Turnpike, and it was
> much appreciated.
No it wasn't. The advice was incorrect. If you had used it, and "our Tone"
hadn't helpfully corrected it, your killfile would not have been "working"
and thus Nelly would be to blame.
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
Wright, and I thusly replied:
Good job someone is awake around here. Thanks, Tone!
Tony Wright
writes:
>Ahah. I can't say I'm up on Keptruin reg-exps - I'm just re-writing yours
>:-)
That's a bad idea. You would be better posting something like:
-----------
Kill on entries in Path:
news.value-news.net
-----------
And let people implement that in their own software. Anyone then wanting
to post specific rules for particular news clients / proxies is free to
do so. The important thing is that you have a means to test the efficacy
of a rule to ensure that it does exactly what you want, but no more.
Getting kf rules wrong is potentially very damaging -- Roz put a bunch
in her kf and somehow managed to kill all of d.l. Since recovered.
I thought long and hard about kf rules but decided there wasn't much
left to lose -- if the group was to carry on.
--
Tony
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
Wright, and I thusly replied:
> In article <878545...@nemesis.nu>, Neil Barker <Ne...@nemesis.nu>
You and your little clique should move off to a web forum. Or maybe a
sooper sekrit newsguy newsfroup.
Fhil |<yl3
>In article <878545...@nemesis.nu>, Neil Barker <Ne...@nemesis.nu>
>writes:
>
>>Ahah. I can't say I'm up on Keptruin reg-exps - I'm just re-writing yours
>>:-)
>
>That's a bad idea. You would be better posting something like:
>-----------
>Kill on entries in Path:
>
> news.value-news.net
>-----------
>And let people implement that in their own software. Anyone then wanting
>to post specific rules for particular news clients / proxies is free to
>do so. The important thing is that you have a means to test the efficacy
>of a rule to ensure that it does exactly what you want, but no more.
>
Yes, well they seem incapable of figuring out such complex things
themselves. On the plus side, they think you're clever. Thanks Tone.
>Getting kf rules wrong is potentially very damaging -- Roz put a bunch
>in her kf and somehow managed to kill all of d.l. Since recovered.
You say that like it's a bad thing.
--
Phil K.
From: Harry Bloomfield <harry.m1...@tiscali.co.uk>
Newsgroups: uk.rec.caravanning
Subject: The recent troll attack! Phil Kyle
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 16:32:18 +0100
Organization: Them
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <MPG.19b830e06...@news.individual.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.46.134.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1062084738 10848417 80.46.134.0 (16 [117723])
X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.60
Hi,
The recent multiple postings to by an immature juvenile known to
several usenet groups as 'Phil Kyle', from a certain northern academic
institute, should now be at an end. This was a direct result of the
complaint I made to the administrator at that location. For this his
first offence, 'Phil Kyle' has received a warning and allowed
continuing use of his account.
Should there be more examples of similar abuse, I have the address to
which to make further complaints. If anyone wants a copy of the address
to which to make any future complaints, I will be happy to forward it
on request by email.
--
Regards,
Harry (M1BYT)...
Remove the 'NOSPAM' in my email address to reply.
Free Amateur Radio Courses:-
http://www.ukradioamateur.org
Fhil |<yl3
added onto my boots:
>The Lord alerted my mind to the presence of this EVIL article by Tony
>Wright, and I thusly replied:
>
>> In article <878545...@nemesis.nu>, Neil Barker <Ne...@nemesis.nu>
>> writes:
>>
>>>Ahah. I can't say I'm up on Keptruin reg-exps - I'm just re-writing
>>>yours
>>>:-)
>>
>> That's a bad idea. You would be better posting something like:
>> -----------
>> Kill on entries in Path:
>>
>> news.value-news.net
>> -----------
>> And let people implement that in their own software. Anyone then wanting
>> to post specific rules for particular news clients / proxies is free to
>> do so. The important thing is that you have a means to test the efficacy
>> of a rule to ensure that it does exactly what you want, but no more.
>>
>> Getting kf rules wrong is potentially very damaging -- Roz put a bunch
>> in her kf and somehow managed to kill all of d.l. Since recovered.
>>
>> I thought long and hard about kf rules but decided there wasn't much
>> left to lose -- if the group was to carry on.
>
>You and your little clique should move off to a web forum. Or maybe a
>sooper sekrit newsguy newsfroup.
>
That last one's been done.
--
Phil K.
Hi,
Paul Rooney
Have you got some kind of language problem? Speak English, man.
Tash
>
>> Getting kf rules wrong is potentially very damaging -- Roz put a bunch
>> in her kf and somehow managed to kill all of d.l. Since recovered.
>
>
*giggle*
May be I company of Roz. I make of same. Think of me make rule easy use
'news' on own. Is puzzle not see any of post dl time long :( Now is
make fix. I idiot :)
--
T
a
s
h
Paul Rooney
>May be I company of Roz.
This wouldn't even be funny if it were genuine. It's fakeness makes it
wholly devoid of any merit whatever.
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
|<yl3, and I thusly replied:
It can be done again.
--
The Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
Smiting Sinful Usenet Users Since 1874
"A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even to his
tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the Lord."
- Deuteronomy 23:2
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
Rooney, and I thusly replied:
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:12:37 +0000, Tony Wright
> <a...@saska.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>In article <181422...@nemesis.nu>, Neil Barker <Ne...@nemesis.nu>
>>writes:
>>
>>>Add the following to your killfile:-
>>>
>>>/^Path: .*news\.value-news\.net./h
>>
>>For Turnpike the hyphen (-) has special meaning and should be escaped
>>with a backslash (\):
>>
>> /^Path: .*news\.value\-news\.net./h
>>
>>Others will have to check their particular implementation.
>
> Have you got some kind of language problem? Speak English, man.
We should leave our Tone to inspect his "implementation."
Paul Rooney
(Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip) wrote:
>The Lord alerted my mind to the presence of this EVIL article by Paul
>Rooney, and I thusly replied:
>
>> On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:12:37 +0000, Tony Wright
>> <a...@saska.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>In article <181422...@nemesis.nu>, Neil Barker <Ne...@nemesis.nu>
>>>writes:
>>>
>>>>Add the following to your killfile:-
>>>>
>>>>/^Path: .*news\.value-news\.net./h
>>>
>>>For Turnpike the hyphen (-) has special meaning and should be escaped
>>>with a backslash (\):
>>>
>>> /^Path: .*news\.value\-news\.net./h
>>>
>>>Others will have to check their particular implementation.
>>
>> Have you got some kind of language problem? Speak English, man.
>
>We should leave our Tone to inspect his "implementation."
The man's clearly a dementee!
Fhil |<yl3
Carry on then.
Fhil |<yl3
Fuck off Pedt. Go complain about us in demon.service, there's a good
chap.
Paul Rooney
<a...@saska.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>I thought long and hard about kf rules but decided there wasn't much
>left to lose -- if the group was to carry on.
You are somewhat confused about the nature of newsgroups. The contents
of your (or anyone else's) killfiles have no relevance to the
continued existence of the group. How could they?
But thanks, Tone, for your input.
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
Baldwin, and I thusly replied:
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 21:37:47 +0000, Tony Wright
> <a...@saska.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>Getting kf rules wrong is potentially very damaging -- Roz put a bunch
>>in her kf and somehow managed to kill all of d.l. Since recovered.
>>
>>I thought long and hard about kf rules but decided there wasn't much
>>left to lose -- if the group was to carry on.
>
> If the worst came to the worst nfilter can be used to implement a
> whitelist. I'm thinking of building one for emergency use.
Why not just create a web forum?
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
Rooney, and I thusly replied:
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 21:37:47 +0000, Tony Wright
> <a...@saska.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>>I thought long and hard about kf rules but decided there wasn't much
>>left to lose -- if the group was to carry on.
>
> You are somewhat confused about the nature of newsgroups. The contents
> of your (or anyone else's) killfiles have no relevance to the
> continued existence of the group. How could they?
> But thanks, Tone, for your input.
Agreed.
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
Nelly has to e-mail Newsguy to get the wheels in motion.
Joe Hutcheon
news:TGuc1aDUja4$Ew...@casakaye.com...
> In message <181422...@nemesis.nu>, Neil Barker <Ne...@nemesis.nu>
> writes
>
> >Add the following to your killfile:-
>
> >/^Path: .*news\.value-news\.net./h
>
>
> Done.
But undone so you can read their crap?
> I still have a good laff looking at the crap wot is wrote that I
> don't have to read.
>
> All that keyboard wanking for nothing. Total and utter losers.
But if you read the crap when you don't have to, surely their efforts, from
their own point of view, do not go for nothing?
Joe Hutcheon
news:$kzEXvPp0i4$EwgF@giggle!relay.pkuatb.net...
Speak English for Christ's sake! This cod-pidgin malarkey is rapidly losing
whatever little appeal it had.
Pedt
>Speak English for Christ's sake!
Can you speak fluent Ukrainian?
--
Pedt
Joe Hutcheon
news:8MDEdTcrIu4$Ewjc@boroda!news.pkuatb.net...
Yes, but I only use it when posting to Ukrainian newsgroups.
Joe Hutcheon
news:708779...@nemesis.nu...
> Quite amusing to think of the trouble they have to go to these days and
> the amount of crap that they write that no-one sees.
No-one except for yourself (and JK, of course).
Paul Rooney
And Pedtash.
JK
<p...@boynings.co.uk> writes
>>> All that keyboard wanking for nothing. Total and utter losers.
>>But if you read the crap when you don't have to, surely their efforts, from
>>their own point of view, do not go for nothing?
>Or even if he comments on it (he may not be reading it, just seeing
>the number of filtered posts). Or if people post rather obvious
>killfile rules for those unable to read a header.
I don't read any of it, I only see their names with large
red crosses on them. They are just empty posts, but it's
still a good chortle looking at all that wasted energy. YMMV.
--
JK.
mark horsman
j.hut...@jisc.ac.uk says...
> >
> > May be I company of Roz. I make of same. Think of me make rule easy use
> > 'news' on own. Is puzzle not see any of post dl time long :( Now is
> > make fix. I idiot :)
>
> Speak English for Christ's sake! This cod-pidgin malarkey is rapidly losing
> whatever little appeal it had.
>
Telling people what to post now, Sock Puppet? Your persona is slipping.
--
mark horsman
Bah! Humbug!
mark horsman
\""@dontspame.com> says...
Joe Hutcheon
news:brus3e$61c$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
Your paranoia is showing more.
Joe Hutcheon
Order proper words their in least I at put can.
Paul Rooney
How do you know it's wasted energy? Do you assume the posts are
intended for you? Is there any justification for such an assumption?
Yes or no?
Stop wriggling.
mark horsman
j.hut...@jisc.ac.uk says...
> "mark horsman" <ma...@markhorsman.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:brus3e$61c$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
> > Telling people what to post now, Sock Puppet? Your persona is slipping.
>
> Your paranoia is showing more.
ROFL!
Avoid the issue, why don't you.
Paul Rooney
Indeed - I can see it. It's a striped paranoia with a plastic handle.
How garish! How common!
mark horsman
j.hut...@jisc.ac.uk says...
Pity you don't understand them.
Joe Hutcheon
What 'issue' would that be? The Big Issue?
mark horsman
> news:brusm3$61c$3...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
> > Avoid the issue, why don't you.
>
> What 'issue' would that be? The Big Issue?
That you are trying to dictate to people what they
can or cannot post.
Simple enough for you?
Joe Hutcheon
> In article <bruspk$7ra9e$1...@ID-102840.news.uni-berlin.de>,
> j.hut...@jisc.ac.uk says...
> > "mark horsman" <ma...@markhorsman.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:brusm3$61c$3...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
>
> > > Avoid the issue, why don't you.
> >
> > What 'issue' would that be? The Big Issue?
>
> That you are trying to dictate to people what they
> can or cannot post.
Nope. Simply indicating the form in which posts should be presented. No
different from pointing out that binaries should not be posted to non-binary
groups, or indicating to someone that they should learn to trim ffs.
PS Your newreader has inserted extra spaces in your reply, for some reason.
Pedt
So "don't post to a newsgroup unless you're fluent in the language".
Better make sure your posts are all perfectly grammatically correct with
no typographical errors. People might think you're not fluent in the
English language otherwise.
Pity you can't remember your first halting steps in Ukrainian and turn
it round to someone learning English.
Anyway, you've achieved your aim, you can sit there rubbing your hands
with glee that you won't have to work out a killrule. Tash has just
told me (paraphrasing) she won't be posting again. She doesn't mind
people poking fun at her lack of English skills (as others have done)
but she can do without people being insulting about them (like you've
done) and you can "uzny mene" if you think she's going to get posts
rewritten.
--
Pedt
If you *really* want a Puevfgznf greeting: http://www.pedt.demon.co.uk/xmas/
Joe Hutcheon
> Joe Hutcheon <j.hut...@jisc.ac.uk> said:
> >"Pedt" <"\"@ @\""@dontspame.com> wrote in message
> >news:8MDEdTcrIu4$Ewjc@boroda!news.pkuatb.net...
> >> Joe Hutcheon <j.hut...@jisc.ac.uk> said:
> >> >"Tash" <ta...@dontspame.com> wrote in message
> >> [snip]
> >> >Speak English for Christ's sake!
> >>
> >> Can you speak fluent Ukrainian?
> >
> >Yes, but I only use it when posting to Ukrainian newsgroups.
>
> So "don't post to a newsgroup unless you're fluent in the language".
Sounds good to me.
> Better make sure your posts are all perfectly grammatically correct with
> no typographical errors. People might think you're not fluent in the
> English language otherwise.
Indeed.
> Pity you can't remember your first halting steps in Ukrainian and turn
> it round to someone learning English.
I didn't post in halting Ukrainian to Ukrainian newsgroups.
> Anyway, you've achieved your aim, you can sit there rubbing your hands
> with glee that you won't have to work out a killrule. Tash has just
> told me (paraphrasing) she won't be posting again. She doesn't mind
> people poking fun at her lack of English skills (as others have done)
> but she can do without people being insulting about them (like you've
> done) and you can "uzny mene" if you think she's going to get posts
> rewritten.
You should have told her that dl is a robust group.
mark horsman
\""@dontspame.com> says...
>
> with glee that you won't have to work out a killrule. Tash has just
> told me (paraphrasing) she won't be posting again. She doesn't mind
> people poking fun at her lack of English skills (as others have done)
> but she can do without people being insulting about them (like you've
> done) and you can "uzny mene" if you think she's going to get posts
> rewritten.
It would be more than a pity if she lets a little shit of a sock puppet
hound her off the group :(
I hope she reconsiders.
Joe Hutcheon
> It would be more than a pity if she lets a little shit of a sock puppet
> hound her off the group :(
It is impossible to hound someone off a group.
Paul Rooney
wrote:
>Tash has just
>told me (paraphrasing) she won't be posting again.
Will you be replacing her with another imaginary friend?
Paul Rooney
<ma...@markhorsman.co.uk> wrote:
>It would be more than a pity if she lets a little shit of a sock puppet
>hound her off the group :(
>
How does that work then?
Paul Rooney
Correct yer spacing or Jim'll fix you.
Craig Oldfield
\""@dontspame.com> burbled happily...
Joe seems unable or unwilling to converse normally with people in d.l
who are NOT out to disrupt this group, that's the reason he has hit so
many killfiles recently.
--
Craig Oldfield
Joe Hutcheon
news:MPG.1a4d1a6d6a5687c3989d55@localhost...
> In article <8MDEdTcrIu4$Ewjc@boroda!news.pkuatb.net>, Pedt <"\"@ @
> \""@dontspame.com> burbled happily...
> > Joe Hutcheon <j.hut...@jisc.ac.uk> said:
> > >"Tash" <ta...@dontspame.com> wrote in message
> > [snip]
> > >Speak English for Christ's sake!
> >
> > Can you speak fluent Ukrainian?
>
> Joe seems unable or unwilling to converse normally with people in d.l
> who are NOT out to disrupt this group
Don't talk such arrant tripe.
, that's the reason he has hit so
> many killfiles recently.
How many, d'you reckon? I estimate three at most.
Craig Oldfield
\""@dontspame.com> burbled happily...
> Anyway, you've achieved your aim, you can sit there rubbing your hands
> with glee that you won't have to work out a killrule. Tash has just
> told me (paraphrasing) she won't be posting again.
Shame, pity the fuckhead doesn't turn his attentions to those
deliberately trying to disrupt d.l
Cunt.
--
Craig Oldfield
Paul Rooney
<cr...@craigoldfield.co.uk> wrote:
>In article <R6ZvwhBA5v4$EwVF@boroda!news.pkuatb.net>, Pedt <"\"@ @
>\""@dontspame.com> burbled happily...
>> Tash has just told me (paraphrasing) she won't be posting again.
>
>Shame, pity the fuckhead doesn't turn his attentions to those
>deliberately trying to disrupt d.l
>Cunt.
A slight reference problem in the above, I believe. Or are you really
abusing Paedt's imaginary friend?
Joe Hutcheon
They're getting more than enough 'attention' as it is.
mark horsman
cr...@craigoldfield.co.uk says...
Why should that be, d'you think? Indeed, he seems to go out of his way
to do the exact opposite.
Charles King
<R6ZvwhBA5v4$EwVF@boroda!news.pkuatb.net> (demon.local) Pedt <"\"@
@\""@dontspame.com> wrote:
> >> Can you speak fluent Ukrainian?
> >
> >Yes, but I only use it when posting to Ukrainian newsgroups.
> Anyway, you've achieved your aim, you can sit there rubbing your hands
> with glee that you won't have to work out a killrule. Tash has just
> told me (paraphrasing) she won't be posting again. She doesn't mind
> people poking fun at her lack of English skills (as others have done)
> but she can do without people being insulting about them (like you've
> done) and you can "uzny mene" if you think she's going to get posts
> rewritten.
That's a shame - she shouldn't let a glupuy durny inistranitz
interfere with her deligntfully charismatic contributions. She's
ochin harrosho and he can pashul nach huy.
IMHO, of course.
--
Charlie
Joe Hutcheon
in message news:2m36uv8rvvda7jns8...@4ax.com...
> That's a shame - she shouldn't let a glupuy durny inistranitz
> interfere with her deligntfully charismatic contributions. She's
> ochin harrosho and he can pashul nach huy.
>
> IMHO, of course.
LOL! IMO, off course.
mark horsman
> "mark horsman" <ma...@markhorsman.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:brut7e$61c$5...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
> > In article <bruspk$7ra9e$1...@ID-102840.news.uni-berlin.de>,
> > j.hut...@jisc.ac.uk says...
> > > "mark horsman" <ma...@markhorsman.co.uk> wrote in message
> > > news:brusm3$61c$3...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
> >
> > > > Avoid the issue, why don't you.
> > >
> > > What 'issue' would that be? The Big Issue?
> >
> > That you are trying to dictate to people what they
> > can or cannot post.
>
> Nope. Simply indicating the form in which posts should be presented.
By what authority? Were the posts not compliant with the Rule?
Of course they were, you were trying to dictate content. Hypocrite.
> No
> different from pointing out that binaries should not be posted to non-binary
> groups, or indicating to someone that they should learn to trim ffs.
A World away from any such transgression of normal Usenet usage and
Rules.
>
> PS Your newreader has inserted extra spaces in your reply, for some reason.
I was trying to make it easier for you to follow the words with your
finger, since you appear to have an English comprehension problem.
Joe Hutcheon
> In article <brutdp$7mc2v$1...@ID-102840.news.uni-berlin.de>,
> j.hut...@jisc.ac.uk says...
> > "mark horsman" <ma...@markhorsman.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:brut7e$61c$5...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
> > > In article <bruspk$7ra9e$1...@ID-102840.news.uni-berlin.de>,
> > > j.hut...@jisc.ac.uk says...
> > > > "mark horsman" <ma...@markhorsman.co.uk> wrote in message
> > > > news:brusm3$61c$3...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
> > >
> > > > > Avoid the issue, why don't you.
> > > >
> > > > What 'issue' would that be? The Big Issue?
> > >
> > > That you are trying to dictate to people what
they
> > > can or cannot post.
> >
> > Nope. Simply indicating the form in which posts should be presented.
>
> By what authority?
By the authority vested in my by the Grand Illuminati of Bavaria.
Were the posts not compliant with the Rule?
> Of course they were, you were trying to dictate content. Hypocrite.
Hardly 'dictating'. Friendly advice, proffered in the true dl style.
> > No
> > different from pointing out that binaries should not be posted to
non-binary
> > groups, or indicating to someone that they should learn to trim ffs.
>
> A World away from any such transgression of normal Usenet usage and
> Rules.
Rubbish.
> > PS Your newreader has inserted extra spaces in your reply, for some
reason.
>
> I was trying to make it easier for you to follow the words with your
> finger, since you appear to have an English comprehension problem.
I think your newsreader is broken, meself.
mark horsman
> news:brv396$7r1$3...@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
> > > Nope. Simply indicating the form in which posts should be presented.
> >
> > By what authority?
>
> By the authority vested in my by the Grand Illuminati of Bavaria.
>
> Were the posts not compliant with the Rule?
> > Of course they were, you were trying to dictate content. Hypocrite.
>
> Hardly 'dictating'. Friendly advice, proffered in the true dl style.
Rubbish. I was just the sort of behaviour you profess to deplore in
others, or worse. Hypocrite.
>
> > > No
> > > different from pointing out that binaries should not be posted to
> non-binary
> > > groups, or indicating to someone that they should learn to trim ffs.
> >
> > A World away from any such transgression of normal Usenet usage and
> > Rules.
>
> Rubbish.
Yes, you are.
>
> > > PS Your newreader has inserted extra spaces in your reply, for some
> reason.
> >
> > I was trying to make it easier for you to follow the words with your
> > finger, since you appear to have an English comprehension problem.
>
> I think your newsreader is broken, meself.
Methinks not, Sock Puppet.
Pedt
Joe Hutcheon
news:hVQTrDEnRx4$EwxL@boroda!news.pkuatb.net...
Perhaps you should take a course.
Joe Hutcheon
> In article <brv3rm$7m4bg$1...@ID-102840.news.uni-berlin.de>,
> j.hut...@jisc.ac.uk says...
> > "mark horsman" <ma...@markhorsman.co.uk> wrote in message
> Rubbish. I was just the sort of behaviour you profess to deplore in
> others, or worse. Hypocrite.
You was a sort of behaviour?
> > I think your newsreader is broken, meself.
>
> Methinks not, Sock Puppet.
Methinks so, Muppet!
Paul Rooney
I can recommend an educational establishment...
Paul Rooney
<ma...@markhorsman.co.uk> wrote:
>Rubbish. I was just the sort of behaviour you profess to deplore in
>others, or worse.
You were *worse*?
Craig Oldfield
burbled happily...
> > Shame, pity the fuckhead doesn't turn his attentions to those
> > deliberately trying to disrupt d.l
> > Cunt.
>
> Why should that be, d'you think? Indeed, he seems to go out of his way
> to do the exact opposite.
You noticed too? I've no idea why he does that but he's made his choice
how he wishes to view d.l, hope he enjoys it.
--
Craig Oldfield
Joe Hutcheon
> In article <brv2n7$7r1$1...@news6.svr.pol.co.uk>, ma...@markhorsman.co.uk
> burbled happily...
>
> > > Shame, pity the fuckhead doesn't turn his attentions to those
> > > deliberately trying to disrupt d.l
> > > Cunt.
> >
> > Why should that be, d'you think? Indeed, he seems to go out of his way
> > to do the exact opposite.
>
> You noticed too? I've no idea why he does that
You've no idea why I refuse to respond to sigabusers?
> but he's made his choice
> how he wishes to view d.l, hope he enjoys it.
You missed the bit about 'his new chums'.
Paul Rooney
<cr...@craigoldfield.co.uk> wrote:
>
>You noticed too? I've no idea why he does that but he's made his choice
>how he wishes to view d.l, hope he enjoys it.
We all have the opportunity to view dl in more or less any colours and
any layout. Agent has many options, Dialog (free) has even more.
I certainly enjoy my current view.
Dialog, by the way, lets you see X-faces. Clever stuff.
JK
<ma...@markhorsman.co.uk> writes
>I hope she reconsiders.
I second that. Her posts are funny, and I don't mean in a degrading
sort of way.
--
JK.
JK
<cr...@craigoldfield.co.uk> writes
I haven't read a post from him in over a week.
Can't say I've missed much.
--
JK.
Joe Hutcheon
news:huPQvaCQBy4$Ew...@casakaye.com...
You can't say what you've missed if you haven't read any of it!
Chris Hill
<ta...@dontspame.com> writes
>--
>T
>a
>s
>h
Nice sig.
--
C
h
r
is
Joe Hutcheon
news:8qVpL9DUGy4$Ew...@chris-h.demon.co.uk...
Too late! She's been hounded from the group.
Chris Hill
<ma...@markhorsman.co.uk> writes>\""@dontspame.com> says...
>>
>> Anyway, you've achieved your aim, you can sit there rubbing your hands
>> with glee that you won't have to work out a killrule. Tash has just
>> people poking fun at her lack of English skills (as others have done)
>> but she can do without people being insulting about them (like you've
>> done) and you can "uzny mene" if you think she's going to get posts
>> rewritten.
>
>It would be more than a pity if she lets a little shit of a sock puppet
>hound her off the group :(
Certainly would.
>I hope she reconsiders.
Certainly do.
--
Cll
hi
rH
is
Paul Rooney
Please, Paedt, start up yer imaginary fiend again.
Paul Rooney
Only about a week's worth.
Paul Rooney
ROFLYBABYWAWAWAHA!
Paul Rooney
I'm a hound.
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
Hutcheon, and I thusly replied:
> "Pedt" <"\"@ @\""@dontspame.com> wrote in message
> news:R6ZvwhBA5v4$EwVF@boroda!news.pkuatb.net...
>> Anyway, you've achieved your aim, you can sit there rubbing your hands
>> with glee that you won't have to work out a killrule. Tash has just
>> told me (paraphrasing) she won't be posting again. She doesn't mind
>> people poking fun at her lack of English skills (as others have done)
>> but she can do without people being insulting about them (like you've
>> done) and you can "uzny mene" if you think she's going to get posts
>> rewritten.
>
> You should have told her that dl is a robust group.
ROTFL! Comeback of the Year!
Well done, Joe.
--
The Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
Smiting Sinful Usenet Users Since 1874
"A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even to his
tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the Lord."
- Deuteronomy 23:2
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
thusly replied:
Yes you do, racist.
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
horsman, and I thusly replied:
> In article <R6ZvwhBA5v4$EwVF@boroda!news.pkuatb.net>, Pedt <"\"@ @
> \""@dontspame.com> says...
>>
>> Anyway, you've achieved your aim, you can sit there rubbing your hands
>> with glee that you won't have to work out a killrule. Tash has just
>> told me (paraphrasing) she won't be posting again. She doesn't mind
>> people poking fun at her lack of English skills (as others have done)
>> but she can do without people being insulting about them (like you've
>> done) and you can "uzny mene" if you think she's going to get posts
>> rewritten.
>
> It would be more than a pity if she lets a little shit of a sock puppet
> hound her off the group :(
Post your proof that Joe is a sockpuppet.
Go on. Off you go.
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
Rooney, and I thusly replied:
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:33:52 +0000, Pedt <"\"@ @\""@dontspame.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Tash has just
>>told me (paraphrasing) she won't be posting again.
>
> Will you be replacing her with another imaginary friend?
Let's hope he tries to disguise it a bit better next time.
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
Hutcheon, and I thusly replied:
> "Craig Oldfield" <cr...@craigoldfield.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1a4d1af58e51b526989d56@localhost...
>> In article <R6ZvwhBA5v4$EwVF@boroda!news.pkuatb.net>, Pedt <"\"@ @
>> \""@dontspame.com> burbled happily...
>>
>> > Anyway, you've achieved your aim, you can sit there rubbing your
>> > hands with glee that you won't have to work out a killrule. Tash has
>> > just told me (paraphrasing) she won't be posting again.
>>
>> Shame, pity the fuckhead doesn't turn his attentions to those
>> deliberately trying to disrupt d.l
>
> They're getting more than enough 'attention' as it is.
It's impossible to "disrupt" a newsgroup.
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
Hutcheon, and I thusly replied:
> "Craig Oldfield" <cr...@craigoldfield.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1a4d2b06ffc22023989d57@localhost...
>> In article <brv2n7$7r1$1...@news6.svr.pol.co.uk>, ma...@markhorsman.co.uk
>> burbled happily...
>>
>> > > Shame, pity the fuckhead doesn't turn his attentions to those
>> > > deliberately trying to disrupt d.l
>> > > Cunt.
>> >
>> > Why should that be, d'you think? Indeed, he seems to go out of his
>> > way to do the exact opposite.
>>
>> You noticed too? I've no idea why he does that
>
> You've no idea why I refuse to respond to sigabusers?
Who cares about sig-abusers! You shouldn't side with idiots like Neil and
Craig.
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
Hutcheon, and I thusly replied:
> "JK" <jo...@casakaye.com> wrote in message
Don't expect JK to understand that. That's far too complex for him.
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
Rooney, and I thusly replied:
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:19:28 -0000, "Joe Hutcheon"
> <j.hut...@jisc.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>>"Pedt" <"\"@ @\""@dontspame.com> wrote in message
>>news:hVQTrDEnRx4$EwxL@boroda!news.pkuatb.net...
>>> Joe Hutcheon <j.hut...@jisc.ac.uk> said:
>>>
>>> >off course.
>>>
>>> Perhaps you should get back on course.
>>
>>Perhaps you should take a course.
>
> I can recommend an educational establishment...
So can I!
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
Hutcheon, and I thusly replied:
> "Craig Oldfield" <cr...@craigoldfield.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1a4d1a6d6a5687c3989d55@localhost...
>> In article <8MDEdTcrIu4$Ewjc@boroda!news.pkuatb.net>, Pedt <"\"@ @
>> \""@dontspame.com> burbled happily...
>> > Joe Hutcheon <j.hut...@jisc.ac.uk> said:
>> > >"Tash" <ta...@dontspame.com> wrote in message
>> > [snip]
>> > >Speak English for Christ's sake!
>> >
>> > Can you speak fluent Ukrainian?
>>
>> Joe seems unable or unwilling to converse normally with people in d.l
>> who are NOT out to disrupt this group
>
> Don't talk such arrant tripe.
>
> , that's the reason he has hit so
>> many killfiles recently.
>
> How many, d'you reckon? I estimate three at most.
Zero is the correct answer. They're all talk.
Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
horsman, and I thusly replied:
> In article <bruspk$7ra9e$1...@ID-102840.news.uni-berlin.de>,
> j.hut...@jisc.ac.uk says...
>> "mark horsman" <ma...@markhorsman.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:brusm3$61c$3...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
>
>> > Avoid the issue, why don't you.
>>
>> What 'issue' would that be? The Big Issue?
>
> That you are trying to dictate to people what they
> can or cannot post.
>
>
> Simple enough for you?
This is a robust group.