my site
Glynn Bradley
Help appreciated.
--
For information on over 30 UK credit union's, with web pages.
http://www.euphony.demon.co.uk
Shop till you drop at http://www.outlane.com.
What do you know abouut Puwer98????
Pedt Scragg
>Does my site look OK to the partially blind.
>
background should be lightened a bit as the contrast is not quite
high enough.
Colne Valley site: no chance IMO. Red on dark blue is a bad combination
for the initial links. I didn't go further into the pages as that would
have been enough to put me off.
Golgar Community Shop: better with more contrast. The graphic doesn't
seem to exist on the site.
For both, the marquee [which only works in IE] will be very difficult
for the partially sighted and looks naff on sites anyway. The JS one
on the opening page has the same properties.
BTW, red on black is a known propensity of pornographic sites. I'd
actually suggest you use black text on a pale pastel background if
you are looking to accommodate the partially blind and also but alt
attributes in your <IMG> tags - even if only alt="".
--
Pedt Scragg http://signpost-design.co.uk/ ODP Editor: http://dmoz.org/
Signpost Web Design, Wrecsam, North Wales Member of FSB
Tony Morgan
<eup...@euphony.demon.co.uk> writes
>Does my site look OK to the partially blind.
>
I won't comment :-)
But I'd recommend that you carefully read:
http://www.rnib.org.uk/digital/hints.htm
and if you install CGI/Perl on your PC you might like to get BETSIE,
information at:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/education/betsie/tech.html
--
Tony Morgan http://www.atomor.demon.co.uk
http://www.atomor.com
David Dorward
>
> Does my site look OK to the partially blind.
I suggest you run it through http://www.cast.org/bobby/, it is an HTML
validator designed to check compatability with technology to make it
possible for people with disabilities to use the Internet.
> Help appreciated.
Hope this is useful
--
David Dorward
http://www.dorward.co.uk/