Re: [delayed_job] Rails 4.0.0.rc1?

128 views
Skip to first unread message

David Genord II

unread,
May 21, 2013, 11:44:42 AM5/21/13
to delay...@googlegroups.com
We have not released gems compatible with Rails 4 yet, because Rails 4 is not finished yet. The master branches for delayed_job and delayed_job_active_record should both work with Rails 4. Please submit an issue with anything not yet working.

David Genord II


On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Nate Norrgard <nate.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello all. First let me thank everyone for this great tool.

We are building an app soon to go into beta and we want to start a branch for Rails 4 testing (we are presently on 3.2.13 and using PostgreSQL 9.2).

I can't seem to get Rails 4.0.0.rc1 to install due to dependency problems with delayed_job_active_record.

I have searched around and have not found anything. So, I'm humbly coming here.

Thanks.

N

--
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "delayed_job" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to delayed_job...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

Nate Norrgard

unread,
May 21, 2013, 7:43:46 PM5/21/13
to delay...@googlegroups.com
Thanks for the response. I just put this in my gemfile:

gem 'delayed_job_active_record', git: 'git://github.com/collectiveidea/delayed_job_active_record.git', branch: 'master'

and received this error from 'bundle update rails':

Fetching gem metadata from https://rubygems.org/.......
Fetching gem metadata from https://rubygems.org/..
Resolving dependencies...
Bundler could not find compatible versions for gem "activesupport":
  In Gemfile:
    delayed_job_active_record (>= 0) ruby depends on
      activesupport (~> 3.0) ruby

    rails (= 4.0.0.rc1) ruby depends on
      activesupport (4.0.0.rc1)

David Genord II

unread,
May 21, 2013, 7:50:18 PM5/21/13
to delay...@googlegroups.com
You need to add delayed_job the same way.

David Genord II


--
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages