There is a second Herrara case, different Herrara, that involves MERS. I think we need to distinguish

I think that this is the first California case to hold that a HAMP trial plan is, indeed, a contract

Another victory for the good guys. And a big one. Now - how do we apply this to California? Mark http

As much more information as you have.... If you want to post it in a central place try: https://

http://www.scribd.com/doc/48827432/In-Re-Agard-48750818-US-Bankruptcy-Court-New-York-Memorandum-

Check out this article in the Huffington Post. This guy has been writing about this since 2010. On

The Committee in charge of the UCC has written the official position on the issue of who can enforce

Thanks to Amir Dibaei <amirdi...@gmail.com> for showing me this case. Giannini v. Am. Home

The AG of New York has opened fire. http://news.yahoo.com/york-sues-banks-over-electronic-mortgage-

Mark and Robert: As to the second point in regards to the authorization agreement. I have raised this

[as much a test to see what happens when I respond via email rather than on the group] I have

Dan In a message dated 9/20/2011 6:16:06 PM Pacific Daylight Time, djha...@gmail.com writes: -

Mark and those I met at the convention: It was great to meet others in the same position and I am

As you probably know, since you are looking at this group, I practice in the area of foreclosure