Re: he'll be specifying per lean Pearl until his yield spares surprisingly
matthias
Peter Pearson wrote:
> Reply by email, filling out this form and emailing it to me.
> Trimming off the rest of this post is unnecessary.
>
> I will guarantee anonymity except in cases of blatant abuse.
> I will achieve anonymity by tallying the results in
> uncorrelated tabulations and then deleting the emails.
> (I know this loses interesting correlation data, but if
> resondents want anonymity it's hard to avoid.)
> I know that this anonymity promise depends on trust and that
> you have no particular reason to trust me. Someday, I hope.
> I will post results Saturday.
>
> xxxxxxxx beginning of survey xxxxxxxx
>
> yes( ) ( )no Should RoadRunner be subjected to some kind of UDP?
> yes( ) ( )no ... active UDP (cancels) ?
> yes( ) ( )no ... passive UDP (drop messages) ?
> yes( ) ( )no ... all-groups UDP? (as opposed to specific groups)
> yes( ) ( )no Are you a Usenet sysadmin? How big:_ How long:_
> yes( ) ( )no Should another server be subjected to UDP? Who:_
> yes( ) ( )no Should UDPs be used more often?
> yes( ) ( )no Should UDPs be used less often?
> yes( ) ( )no Would you have answered this survey without anonymity?
>
> xxxxxxxx end of survey xxxxxxxx
>
> --
> Everybody fly the regular cast and stare it as to its committee.