Hey, this looks good. Looks like the revocation clauses are gone, so the
data might be usable in projects like OpenStreetMap. Would have been
nice if the licence URL we have to quote was a bit more robust and
memorable, but we chide because we love.
cheers,
Stewart
On 12-01-30 9:51 AM, Reham Gorgis wrote:
> We've been quite busy, but I'd like to re-announce some of the great
> things we've recently been working on:
> *Freedom of Information Requests Summary
> *Lobbyist Registry
> *Parking Tickets
> *Open311 API <http://www.toronto.ca/311/open311.htm>
>
> Also, our new and improved Licence
>
> Finally, if you haven't checked out our Blog, DATA eh
> <http://webrebrand.blogspot.com/>, be sure to see it & subscribe or
> follow us by email.
> Have a look www.toronto.ca/open <http://www.toronto.ca/open>. Have
> questions, email us at open...@toronto.ca <mailto:open...@toronto.ca>.
Thanks, Reham! Much appreciated.
So if I were to put a section in the OpenStreetMap Contributors' page
for City of Toronto Open Data saying something like:
Contains public sector Datasets made available under the
City of Toronto's Open Data Licence v2.0.
http://www.toronto.ca/open/licence
Would it be acceptable to use the applicable data sets in OpenStreetMap?
Examples of contributor entries for Canada are here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Canada
An example of data usable under the UK Open Government Licence:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#UK:_Ordnance_Survey_.28OpenData.E2.84.A2.29
Many thanks,
Stewart